PillCam® ESO 2 in Esophageal Pathologies
MA-76
Evaluation of PillCam® ESO 2 in Patients With Suspected Esophageal Pathologies
1 other identifier
observational
101
1 country
10
Brief Summary
Study Hypothesis:
- PillCam™ ESO-2 will demonstrate equivalent accuracy parameters as compared to blinded esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in detecting suspected Barrett's esophagus, detecting and grading esophagitis.
- PillCam™ ESO will demonstrate all safety parameters as compared to EGD
- PillCam™ ESO-2 will demonstrate better patient's satisfaction as compared to EGD
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2007
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2009
CompletedJuly 31, 2019
August 1, 2009
1.2 years
April 20, 2009
July 29, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy parameters (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) of PillCam ESO 2 in detecting suspected Barrett's Esophagus (BE) as compared to standard EGD, using unblinded EGD as the reference standard.
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Level of agreement (i.e. positive, negative and overall agreement parameters) between PillCam ESO 2 and standard EGD in classifying the Z-line following the ZAP score (Wallner et. al 2002), where Grades 0&I and grades II&III will be consolidated.
7 days
Accuracy Parameters (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) of PillCam ESO 2 in detecting Esophagitis as compared to standard EGD, using unblinded EGD as the reference standard.
7 days
Subjects' satisfaction will be assessed by a post procedure questionnaire
7 days
Study Arms (1)
1
Patients with known Barrett's Esophagus or chronic GERD
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with known Barrett's Esophagus or chronic GERD
You may qualify if:
- Patient age is 18 years or older
- Patient is known or suspected to suffer from an esophageal disease based on his/her medical history and recent symptoms suggestive of GERD or BE
- Patient agrees and signs the Informed Consent Form
- Currently taking PPI for at least 28 days.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has dysphagia
- Patient has known Zenker's Diverticulum
- Patient is known or is suspected to suffer from esophageal and/or intestinal obstruction
- Patient has a cardiac pacemakers or other implanted electro medical devices
- Patient who has undergone an EGD within past seven days
- Female patient is pregnant and/or lactating
- Patient is expected to undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination within 7 days after ingestion of the capsule
- Patient has had a prior pelvic or abdominal surgery of the gastrointestinal tract (other than uncomplicated procedures that would be unlikely to lead to bowel obstruction based on the clinical judgment of the investigator such as appendectomy or uncomplicated cholecystectomy)
- Patient has any condition which precludes compliance with the study and/or device instructions
- Patient suffers from life threatening conditions
- Patient is currently participating in another clinical study
- Patient is on medications that may coat the esophagus such as iron or sulcrafate.
- Contraindication for any radiation or barium (e.g., sensitivity or allergy) required to confirm excretion of the capsule if necessary.
- Patient is currently suffering from conditions like allergy, illness (flu) or anything else that causes congestion, excessive salivation, etc. that could foster difficulty in swallowing the capsule or affect the clarity of the CE images.
- Contraindicated for use of laxatives, or surgery required to remove a capsule e.g., colonoscopy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medtronic - MITGlead
Study Sites (10)
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Rockford Gastroenterolgy Assoicates
Rockford, Illinois, 61107, United States
Minnesota Gastroenterology
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55446, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Department of VA Medical Affairs Medical Center of Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 66160, United States
New York Gastroenterology Assoicates
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239-3098, United States
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Glen Eisen, MD
Oregon Health and Science University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Prateek Sharma, MD
Department of VA Medical Affairs Medical Center of Kansas City
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2009
First Posted
April 22, 2009
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
March 1, 2009
Study Completion
April 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 31, 2019
Record last verified: 2009-08