NCT00878384

Brief Summary

It is still uncertain what the best treatment is for patients who have both atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure. The aim of the study is to help identify the optimal treatment for patients with these two significant medical conditions. This will be performed by comparing two alternative strategies for AF management: catheter ablation (to restore normal rhythm) and medical therapy (to control heart rate, but not aiming ro restore normal rhythm). After random assignment, the effect of each strategy will be assessed by looking for changes in exercise capacity, symptoms, heart pump function, and quality of life during 12 months of follow-up.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2009

Typical duration for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2009

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2009

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

July 12, 2012

Status Verified

July 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

April 7, 2009

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Atrial FibrillationHeart FailureHeart Rate ControlCatheter Ablation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Peak oxygen consumption at cardiopulmonary exercise test

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction

    12 months

  • Quality of Life score

    3, 6 and 12 months

  • 6 minute walk distance

    3, 6 and 12 months

  • Level of plasma neurohormones (including BNP)

    3, 6 and 12 months

  • Freedom from AF

    3, 6 and 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Rate control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Strategy of 'rate-control': acceptance of atrial fibrillation, and dose-adjusted drug therapy as needed to control ventricular rate.

Drug: Medication to control ventricular rate in AF

Catheter Ablation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Strategy of 'rhythm control' by catheter ablation: patients will undergo catheter ablation with the intention of restoring sinus rhythm.

Procedure: Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Interventions

Standard pharmacologic rate control. Current therapy will be adjusted to achieve rate-control targets of \<80bpm and \<110bpm on exercise (6 minute walk). Where necessary, additional medication will be given as per standard practice (digoxin or beta-blocker). Typical does: Digoxin 62.5-250mcg o.d. ; Bisoprolol 1.25-20mg o.d.; Carvedilol 3.125-50mg b.d. ; Nebivolol 1.25-10mg o.d.

Rate control

Radiofrequency catheter ablation, which may include pulmonary vein isolation, atrial substrate modification, and/or linear ablation.

Also known as: Radiofrequency catheter ablation, AF ablation, LA maze
Catheter Ablation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years, \< 80years
  • NYHA II-IV symptoms
  • Impairment of left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction estimated as ≤ 35% by radionuclide ventriculography)
  • Documented AF lasting for at least 7 days (persistent or permanent AF)

You may not qualify if:

  • CRT or ICD device implanted in the previous 6 months
  • AV nodal ablation within previous 3 months
  • Prior AV nodal ablation or complete heart block with a single chamber pacemaker
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation
  • Persistent thrombus in the left atrium despite anticoagulation
  • Active malignancy
  • Cerebrovascular accident within the previous 6 months
  • Reversible causes of AF including thyroid disorders, alcohol, recent surgery
  • Reversible causes of heart failure including acute myocarditis or alcohol
  • Cardiac events including myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), valve or coronary bypass surgery within the previous 3 months
  • Prior AF ablation procedure
  • Previous heart transplant, or on urgent heart transplant waiting list
  • Severe neuro-muscular disease
  • Creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min
  • Serum bilirubin \>50 micromol/L
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust

London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Hsu LF, Jais P, Sanders P, Garrigue S, Hocini M, Sacher F, Takahashi Y, Rotter M, Pasquie JL, Scavee C, Bordachar P, Clementy J, Haissaguerre M. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 2;351(23):2373-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041018.

    PMID: 15575053BACKGROUND
  • Dries DL, Exner DV, Gersh BJ, Domanski MJ, Waclawiw MA, Stevenson LW. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Sep;32(3):695-703. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00297-6.

    PMID: 9741514BACKGROUND
  • Middlekauff HR, Stevenson WG, Stevenson LW. Prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in advanced heart failure. A study of 390 patients. Circulation. 1991 Jul;84(1):40-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.1.40.

    PMID: 2060110BACKGROUND
  • Swedberg K, Olsson LG, Charlesworth A, Cleland J, Hanrath P, Komajda M, Metra M, Torp-Pedersen C, Poole-Wilson P. Prognostic relevance of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic heart failure on long-term treatment with beta-blockers: results from COMET. Eur Heart J. 2005 Jul;26(13):1303-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi166. Epub 2005 Mar 14.

    PMID: 15767288BACKGROUND
  • Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S, Wyse DG, Dorian P, Lee KL, Bourassa MG, Arnold JM, Buxton AE, Camm AJ, Connolly SJ, Dubuc M, Ducharme A, Guerra PG, Hohnloser SH, Lambert J, Le Heuzey JY, O'Hara G, Pedersen OD, Rouleau JL, Singh BN, Stevenson LW, Stevenson WG, Thibault B, Waldo AL; Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure Investigators. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 19;358(25):2667-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708789.

    PMID: 18565859BACKGROUND
  • Pedersen OD, Brendorp B, Elming H, Pehrson S, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. Does conversion and prevention of atrial fibrillation enhance survival in patients with left ventricular dysfunction? Evidence from the Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality ON Dofetilide/(DIAMOND) study. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Sep;7(3):220-4. doi: 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000012386.82055.81.

    PMID: 14739717BACKGROUND
  • Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Geller N, Greene HL, Josephson RA, Kellen JC, Klein RC, Krahn AD, Mickel M, Mitchell LB, Nelson JD, Rosenberg Y, Schron E, Shemanski L, Waldo AL, Wyse DG; AFFIRM Investigators. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation. 2004 Mar 30;109(12):1509-13. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121736.16643.11. Epub 2004 Mar 8.

    PMID: 15007003BACKGROUND
  • Hagens VE, Crijns HJ, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Van Den Berg MP, Rienstra M, Ranchor AV, Bosker HA, Kamp O, Tijssen JG, Veeger NJ, Van Gelder IC; RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation study group. Rate control versus rhythm control for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation with mild to moderate heart failure: results from the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion (RACE) study. Am Heart J. 2005 Jun;149(6):1106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.11.030.

    PMID: 15976795BACKGROUND
  • Jones DG, Haldar SK, Jarman JW, Johar S, Hussain W, Markides V, Wong T. Impact of stepwise ablation on the biatrial substrate in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;6(4):761-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000390. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

  • Jones DG, Haldar SK, Hussain W, Sharma R, Francis DP, Rahman-Haley SL, McDonagh TA, Underwood SR, Markides V, Wong T. A randomized trial to assess catheter ablation versus rate control in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 May 7;61(18):1894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.069. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial FibrillationHeart Failure

Interventions

Catheter Ablation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Radiofrequency AblationRadiofrequency TherapyTherapeuticsAblation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Tom Wong, MD FESC

    Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2009

First Posted

April 8, 2009

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion

June 1, 2012

Study Completion

July 1, 2012

Last Updated

July 12, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-07

Locations