Magnetically Navigated vs. Manually Guided Radiofrequency in Atrioventricular-node-reentry-tachycardia
MAGMA-AVNRT
Randomized Comparison Between Magnetically Navigated vs Manually Guided Radiofrequency in AV-node-reentry-tachycardia
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The MAGMA-AVNRT study compares two different methods of handling the ablation catheters for av-node-reentry-tachycardia with regard to x-ray dose, safety and success: manually guided vs magnetically navigated RF-catheter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Apr 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedJune 27, 2016
June 1, 2016
2.9 years
April 3, 2009
June 24, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total x-ray time and dose for patient
electrophysiological examination
Secondary Outcomes (5)
X-ray time and dose for physician
electrophysiological study
Safety of ablation (AV-Block, perforation)
end of electrophysiological study
short-term and long-term-success
end of procedure and 6 months after procedure
number of RF-application
procedure
Duration of electrophysiological study (ablation included)
procedure
Study Arms (2)
Manually guided
EXPERIMENTALTreatment with manually guided RF-catheter
Magnetically navigated
EXPERIMENTALTreatment with magnetically navigated RF-catheter.
Interventions
4mm-tip catheter manually guided vs magneticallly navigated
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 70 years old
- suspected AV-node-reentry-tachycardia
- written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
- contraindication against electrophysiological study or ablation
- congenital heart disease or other anatomical abnormalities
- previous surgical procedure involving atrium except aorto-coronary bypass grafts
- psychiatric disease that makes a completion of study improbable
- severe comorbidities with a life expectancy less than 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchenlead
- University of Bergencollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Bergen
Bergen, 5021, Norway
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Gabi Hessling, MD
Deutsches Herzzentrum München
- STUDY CHAIR
Peter Schuster, MD
University of Bergen
- STUDY CHAIR
Isabel Deisenhofer, MD
Deutsches Herzzentrum München
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2009
First Posted
April 6, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 27, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06