NCT00873158

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two treatments for adhesive capsulitis.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2006

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 31, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 1, 2009

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

August 12, 2013

Status Verified

August 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

8 years

First QC Date

March 31, 2009

Last Update Submit

August 8, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Adhesive CapsulitisROMDynasplint

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of physical therapy treatments required

    throughout trial

  • Weeks of Dynasplint treatment

    throughout trial

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Shoulder Range Of Motion

    initial consultation, first visit following injection, and monthly following injection

  • Sharp FAS Neck and Shoulder

    initial consultation, immediatly prior to first treatment following injection, and monthly following injection

  • Disabilities of Arm, Hand, and Shoulder Questionnaire

    initial visit, first visit following injection, and weekly until discharge

Study Arms (2)

Physical Therapy Group

NO INTERVENTION

Patient's in the Physical Therapy Group will have the standard manual treatments during their usual physical therapy visits with no additional intervention

Dynasplint Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Along with standard manual physical therapy, patients will have a stretching device (Dynasplint) used in rehabilitation to regain ROM in stiff joints. Patients will use this device 20-30 minutes 2 times per day at home.

Device: Dynasplint

Interventions

Dynamic splinting utilizes the protocols of Low-Load Prolonged Stretch (LLPS) with calibrated adjustable tension to increase Total End Range Time (TERT)to reduce contracture. The Dynasplint or "Experimental" group will add this therapy to their standard of care regimen

Dynasplint Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 64 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis
  • greater than 50% limitation in active flexion, internal rotation, or external rotation
  • Tight GHJ capsule in at least 2 directions
  • Capsular end-feel primarily limits ROM
  • Age 40- 64
  • Normal X-Rays

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute adhesive capsulitis
  • History of Diabetes Mellitus
  • Evidence of a cuff tear
  • Recent history of trauma
  • Evidence of glenohumeral DJD
  • History of shoulder surgery
  • Calcification of tendonitis demonstrated on a current X-Ray
  • Abnormal X-Ray
  • Cervical Radiculopathy/brachial plexus lesions
  • Less than 2+/5 muscle strength during mid-line manual muscle testing
  • Muscle Atrophy
  • Presence of associated systematic conditions
  • History of prior therapy for current condition
  • Manipulation under anesthesia
  • Non compliance
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Gaspar Physical Therapy

Solana Beach, California, 92075, United States

Location

Andrews Research & Education Institute

Gulf Breeze, Florida, 32561, United States

Location

University Orthopedics Center

State College, Pennsylvania, 16801, United States

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Hamdan TA, Al-Essa KA. Manipulation under anaesthesia for the treatment of frozen shoulder. Int Orthop. 2003;27(2):107-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-002-0397-6. Epub 2002 Sep 13.

    PMID: 12700935BACKGROUND
  • Othman A, Taylor G. Manipulation under anaesthesia for frozen shoulder. Int Orthop. 2002;26(5):268-70. doi: 10.1007/s00264-002-0348-2. Epub 2002 Mar 27.

    PMID: 12378350BACKGROUND
  • Placzek JD, Roubal PJ, Freeman DC, Kulig K, Nasser S, Pagett BT. Long-term effectiveness of translational manipulation for adhesive capsulitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Nov;(356):181-91. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00025.

    PMID: 9917683BACKGROUND
  • Omari A, Bunker TD. Open surgical release for frozen shoulder: surgical findings and results of the release. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Jul-Aug;10(4):353-7. doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.115986.

    PMID: 11517365BACKGROUND
  • Pollock RG, Duralde XA, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. The use of arthroscopy in the treatment of resistant frozen shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):30-6.

    PMID: 8020231BACKGROUND
  • Warner JJ, Allen A, Marks PH, Wong P. Arthroscopic release for chronic, refractory adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Dec;78(12):1808-16. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199612000-00003.

    PMID: 8986657BACKGROUND
  • Carette S, Moffet H, Tardif J, Bessette L, Morin F, Fremont P, Bykerk V, Thorne C, Bell M, Bensen W, Blanchette C. Intraarticular corticosteroids, supervised physiotherapy, or a combination of the two in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Mar;48(3):829-38. doi: 10.1002/art.10954.

    PMID: 12632439BACKGROUND
  • Arslan S, Celiker R. Comparison of the efficacy of local corticosteroid injection and physical therapy for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. Rheumatol Int. 2001 Sep;21(1):20-3. doi: 10.1007/s002960100127.

    PMID: 11678298BACKGROUND
  • Hannafin JA, Chiaia TA. Adhesive capsulitis. A treatment approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Mar;(372):95-109.

    PMID: 10738419BACKGROUND
  • Vermeulen HM, Obermann WR, Burger BJ, Kok GJ, Rozing PM, van Den Ende CH. End-range mobilization techniques in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: A multiple-subject case report. Phys Ther. 2000 Dec;80(12):1204-13.

    PMID: 11087307BACKGROUND
  • Hsu AT, Hedman T, Chang JH, Vo C, Ho L, Ho S, Chang GL. Changes in abduction and rotation range of motion in response to simulated dorsal and ventral translational mobilization of the glenohumeral joint. Phys Ther. 2002 Jun;82(6):544-56.

    PMID: 12036396BACKGROUND
  • Hsu AT, Ho L, Ho S, Hedman T. Joint position during anterior-posterior glide mobilization: its effect on glenohumeral abduction range of motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Feb;81(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90143-6.

    PMID: 10668777BACKGROUND
  • Hsu AT, Ho L, Ho S, Hedman T. Immediate response of glenohumeral abduction range of motion to a caudally directed translational mobilization: a fresh cadaver simulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Nov;81(11):1511-6. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.9389.

    PMID: 11083357BACKGROUND
  • Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003 Dec;19(10):1109-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030.

    PMID: 14673454BACKGROUND
  • Gaspar PD, Willis FB. Adhesive capsulitis and dynamic splinting: a controlled, cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Sep 7;10:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-111.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bursitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Buck Willis, PhD

    Dynasplint Systems, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2009

First Posted

April 1, 2009

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion

January 1, 2014

Last Updated

August 12, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-08

Locations