Study Stopped
Unrelated to trial
Dynamic Splinting for Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
DS-SDH
Outcomes Following Dynamic Splinting and/or Physical Therapy for Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two treatments for adhesive capsulitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedAugust 12, 2013
August 1, 2013
8 years
March 31, 2009
August 8, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of physical therapy treatments required
throughout trial
Weeks of Dynasplint treatment
throughout trial
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Shoulder Range Of Motion
initial consultation, first visit following injection, and monthly following injection
Sharp FAS Neck and Shoulder
initial consultation, immediatly prior to first treatment following injection, and monthly following injection
Disabilities of Arm, Hand, and Shoulder Questionnaire
initial visit, first visit following injection, and weekly until discharge
Study Arms (2)
Physical Therapy Group
NO INTERVENTIONPatient's in the Physical Therapy Group will have the standard manual treatments during their usual physical therapy visits with no additional intervention
Dynasplint Group
EXPERIMENTALAlong with standard manual physical therapy, patients will have a stretching device (Dynasplint) used in rehabilitation to regain ROM in stiff joints. Patients will use this device 20-30 minutes 2 times per day at home.
Interventions
Dynamic splinting utilizes the protocols of Low-Load Prolonged Stretch (LLPS) with calibrated adjustable tension to increase Total End Range Time (TERT)to reduce contracture. The Dynasplint or "Experimental" group will add this therapy to their standard of care regimen
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis
- greater than 50% limitation in active flexion, internal rotation, or external rotation
- Tight GHJ capsule in at least 2 directions
- Capsular end-feel primarily limits ROM
- Age 40- 64
- Normal X-Rays
You may not qualify if:
- Acute adhesive capsulitis
- History of Diabetes Mellitus
- Evidence of a cuff tear
- Recent history of trauma
- Evidence of glenohumeral DJD
- History of shoulder surgery
- Calcification of tendonitis demonstrated on a current X-Ray
- Abnormal X-Ray
- Cervical Radiculopathy/brachial plexus lesions
- Less than 2+/5 muscle strength during mid-line manual muscle testing
- Muscle Atrophy
- Presence of associated systematic conditions
- History of prior therapy for current condition
- Manipulation under anesthesia
- Non compliance
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dynasplint Systems, Inc.lead
- McMurry Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Gaspar Physical Therapy
Solana Beach, California, 92075, United States
Andrews Research & Education Institute
Gulf Breeze, Florida, 32561, United States
University Orthopedics Center
State College, Pennsylvania, 16801, United States
Related Publications (15)
Hamdan TA, Al-Essa KA. Manipulation under anaesthesia for the treatment of frozen shoulder. Int Orthop. 2003;27(2):107-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-002-0397-6. Epub 2002 Sep 13.
PMID: 12700935BACKGROUNDOthman A, Taylor G. Manipulation under anaesthesia for frozen shoulder. Int Orthop. 2002;26(5):268-70. doi: 10.1007/s00264-002-0348-2. Epub 2002 Mar 27.
PMID: 12378350BACKGROUNDPlaczek JD, Roubal PJ, Freeman DC, Kulig K, Nasser S, Pagett BT. Long-term effectiveness of translational manipulation for adhesive capsulitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Nov;(356):181-91. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00025.
PMID: 9917683BACKGROUNDOmari A, Bunker TD. Open surgical release for frozen shoulder: surgical findings and results of the release. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Jul-Aug;10(4):353-7. doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.115986.
PMID: 11517365BACKGROUNDPollock RG, Duralde XA, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. The use of arthroscopy in the treatment of resistant frozen shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):30-6.
PMID: 8020231BACKGROUNDWarner JJ, Allen A, Marks PH, Wong P. Arthroscopic release for chronic, refractory adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Dec;78(12):1808-16. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199612000-00003.
PMID: 8986657BACKGROUNDCarette S, Moffet H, Tardif J, Bessette L, Morin F, Fremont P, Bykerk V, Thorne C, Bell M, Bensen W, Blanchette C. Intraarticular corticosteroids, supervised physiotherapy, or a combination of the two in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Mar;48(3):829-38. doi: 10.1002/art.10954.
PMID: 12632439BACKGROUNDArslan S, Celiker R. Comparison of the efficacy of local corticosteroid injection and physical therapy for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. Rheumatol Int. 2001 Sep;21(1):20-3. doi: 10.1007/s002960100127.
PMID: 11678298BACKGROUNDHannafin JA, Chiaia TA. Adhesive capsulitis. A treatment approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Mar;(372):95-109.
PMID: 10738419BACKGROUNDVermeulen HM, Obermann WR, Burger BJ, Kok GJ, Rozing PM, van Den Ende CH. End-range mobilization techniques in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: A multiple-subject case report. Phys Ther. 2000 Dec;80(12):1204-13.
PMID: 11087307BACKGROUNDHsu AT, Hedman T, Chang JH, Vo C, Ho L, Ho S, Chang GL. Changes in abduction and rotation range of motion in response to simulated dorsal and ventral translational mobilization of the glenohumeral joint. Phys Ther. 2002 Jun;82(6):544-56.
PMID: 12036396BACKGROUNDHsu AT, Ho L, Ho S, Hedman T. Joint position during anterior-posterior glide mobilization: its effect on glenohumeral abduction range of motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Feb;81(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90143-6.
PMID: 10668777BACKGROUNDHsu AT, Ho L, Ho S, Hedman T. Immediate response of glenohumeral abduction range of motion to a caudally directed translational mobilization: a fresh cadaver simulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Nov;81(11):1511-6. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.9389.
PMID: 11083357BACKGROUNDKirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003 Dec;19(10):1109-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030.
PMID: 14673454BACKGROUNDGaspar PD, Willis FB. Adhesive capsulitis and dynamic splinting: a controlled, cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Sep 7;10:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-111.
PMID: 19735563DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Buck Willis, PhD
Dynasplint Systems, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2009
First Posted
April 1, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 12, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08