NCT00864084

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether participation in pulmonary rehabilitation improves balance in people with respiratory disease.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 17, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2009

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2009

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 20, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2014

Status Verified

August 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

March 17, 2009

Results QC Date

September 30, 2013

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Standing Balance - Sway Path

    Standing balance was measured using a force plate (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) from which centre of pressure (COP) trajectories were derived at a sampling frequency of 100Hz. Participants stood on the force plate during the following two conditions: normal stance (feet hip-width apart) with eyes open and eyes closed.

    Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks

  • Dynamic Balance

    Dynamic balance was measured using the timed up and go (TUG) and Four Square Step Test (FSST). For the TUG, the time taken for the subject to stand from a chair, walk 3 m, turn around and return to the chair was recorded {Podsiadlo, 1991 #31}. Subjects were asked to do this as quickly and safely as possible. High test-retest reliability of the TUG has been reported in older community-dwelling individuals {Steffen, 2002 #34}. In the FSST, subjects were asked to step to four corners of a square in a clockwise and then counter-clockwise direction as quickly as possible {Dite, 2002 #1181}. The time taken to complete this circuit was recorded. This test has been shown to have high inter-rater and test-retest reliability {Dite, 2002 #1181}.

    Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks

  • Standing Balance - Critical Point in Time

    Standing balance was measured using a force plate (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) from which centre of pressure (COP) trajectories were derived at a sampling frequency of 100Hz. Participants stood on the force plate during the following two conditions: normal stance (feet hip-width apart) with eyes open and eyes closed.

    Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks

  • Standing Balance - Critical Point in Distance

    Standing balance was measured using a force plate (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) from which centre of pressure (COP) trajectories were derived at a sampling frequency of 100Hz. Participants stood on the force plate during the following two conditions: normal stance (feet hip-width apart) with eyes open and eyes closed.

    Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Balance Confidence

    Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks

  • Fear of Falling

    Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks

  • Confidence in Disease Management

    Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Pulmonary rehabilitation

EXPERIMENTAL

People with respiratory disease

Other: Pulmonary rehabilitation

Interventions

Pulmonary rehabilitation involves the prescription of customized exercise programs and education on disease management.

Pulmonary rehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of lung disease
  • Committed to regular attendance at pulmonary rehabilitation program
  • A forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) \< 80% of predicted
  • No change in medications for the past 2 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Unstable cardiac disease
  • Neurological conditions
  • Musculoskeletal conditions that prevent participation in exercise sessions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0T6, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Smith MD, Harvey EH, van den Hoorn W, Shay BL, Pereira GM, Hodges PW. Out-Patient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Improves Medial-Lateral Balance in Subjects With Chronic Respiratory Disease: Proof-of-Concept Study. Respir Care. 2016 Apr;61(4):510-20. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04109. Epub 2016 Jan 26.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

This sample size in this study was small. Study participants received an individualised exercise program which means that exercises given and number of pulmonary rehabilitation sessions attended were not standardized between study participants.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Ms Elizabeth Harvey
Organization
The University of Manitoba

Study Officials

  • Michelle D Smith, PhD

    The University of Queensland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Ms

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2009

First Posted

March 18, 2009

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion

June 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2009

Last Updated

September 5, 2014

Results First Posted

August 20, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-08

Locations