Study Stopped
Statistical interim analysis showed valid and significant results
Antero-posterior Versus Antero-lateral Electrode Position for Electrical Cardioversion of Typical Atrial Flutter
APOVERSAL
Prospective, Randomized Single-center Study for Efficacy of Antero-posterior and Antero-lateral Electrode Position for External Electrical Cardioversion of Typical Atrial Flutter
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to identify the one electrode position out of two most commonly used for external electrical cardioversion of typical atrial flutter, which needs less delivered energy and less needed number of shocks for successful cardioversion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2005
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 12, 2009
CompletedAugust 27, 2015
August 1, 2015
11 months
November 10, 2008
November 10, 2008
August 17, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Successfully Cardioverted Participants for Each Electrode Position
After restoration of normal sinus rhythm for 30 seconds and longer by electrical countershock a cardioversion is counted as successful.
30 seconds after cardioversion
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Mean Number of Cardioversion Shocks
30 seconds after cardioversion
Mean Energy Requirement for Successful Cardioversion
30 seconds after cardioversion
Number of Participants Succesfully Cardioverted With First Shock in Each Electrode Position
30 seconds after cardioversion
Study Arms (2)
AP Position
ACTIVE COMPARATORCardioversion with antero-posterior electrode position
AL Position
ACTIVE COMPARATORCardioversion with antero-lateral electrode position
Interventions
external biphasic electrical cardioversion with step-up-protocol of 50-75-100-150-200 Joules if necessary with antero-posterior electrode position until restoration of normal sinus rhythm
external biphasic electrical cardioversion with step-up protocol of 50-75-100-150-200 Joules if necessary with antero-lateral electrode position until restoration of normal sinus rhythm
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- clinical diagnosis of typical atrial flutter
- signed written informed consent
- eligibility for sedation and external electrical cardioversion
You may not qualify if:
- clinical diagnosis of arrhythmia other than typical atrial flutter
- implanted ICD or pacemaker
- proof of atrial thrombi
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Heart Center
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Related Publications (10)
Kerber RE, Kouba C, Martins J, Kelly K, Low R, Hoyt R, Ferguson D, Bailey L, Bennett P, Charbonnier F. Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks. Circulation. 1984 Aug;70(2):303-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.2.303.
PMID: 6733884BACKGROUNDKirchhof P, Eckardt L, Loh P, Weber K, Fischer RJ, Seidl KH, Bocker D, Breithardt G, Haverkamp W, Borggrefe M. Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1275-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11315-8.
PMID: 12414201BACKGROUNDKirchhof P, Borggrefe M, Breithardt G. Effect of electrode position on the outcome of cardioversion. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Sep;7(3):292-6. doi: 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000012399.96959.ab.
PMID: 14739731BACKGROUNDKerber RE, Jensen SR, Grayzel J, Kennedy J, Hoyt R. Elective cardioversion: influence of paddle-electrode location and size on success rates and energy requirements. N Engl J Med. 1981 Sep 17;305(12):658-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198109173051202.
PMID: 7266602BACKGROUNDBotto GL, Politi A, Bonini W, Broffoni T, Bonatti R. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: role of paddle position on technical efficacy and energy requirements. Heart. 1999 Dec;82(6):726-30. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.6.726.
PMID: 10573502BACKGROUNDYoon RS, DeMonte TP, Hasanov KF, Jorgenson DB, Joy ML. Measurement of thoracic current flow in pigs for the study of defibrillation and cardioversion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003 Oct;50(10):1167-73. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2003.816082.
PMID: 14560770BACKGROUNDVan Gelder IC, Tuinenburg AE, Schoonderwoerd BS, Tieleman RG, Crijns HJ. Pharmacologic versus direct-current electrical cardioversion of atrial flutter and fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Nov 4;84(9A):147R-151R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00715-8.
PMID: 10568674BACKGROUNDKerber RE. Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter: standard techniques and new advances. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Oct 17;78(8A):22-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00562-0.
PMID: 8903272BACKGROUNDCamacho MA, Lehr JL, Eisenberg SR. A three-dimensional finite element model of human transthoracic defibrillation: paddle placement and size. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995 Jun;42(6):572-8. doi: 10.1109/10.387196.
PMID: 7790013BACKGROUNDKirchhof P, Monnig G, Wasmer K, Heinecke A, Breithardt G, Eckardt L, Bocker D. A trial of self-adhesive patch electrodes and hand-held paddle electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (MOBIPAPA). Eur Heart J. 2005 Jul;26(13):1292-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi160. Epub 2005 Feb 25.
PMID: 15734772BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Tim Risius, MD
- Organization
- University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Heart Center
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Stephan Willems, Prof. Dr.
Oberarzt
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ltd. Oberarzt des Universitären Herzzentrums Hamburg
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2008
First Posted
March 12, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
December 1, 2005
Study Completion
December 1, 2005
Last Updated
August 27, 2015
Results First Posted
March 12, 2009
Record last verified: 2015-08