NCT00860314

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to identify the one electrode position out of two most commonly used for external electrical cardioversion of typical atrial flutter, which needs less delivered energy and less needed number of shocks for successful cardioversion.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2005

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2005

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2005

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2005

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 10, 2008

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 12, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 12, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

August 27, 2015

Status Verified

August 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

November 10, 2008

Results QC Date

November 10, 2008

Last Update Submit

August 17, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

external electrical cardioversiontypical atrial flutterelectrode positionantero-lateralantero-posteriorbiphasic cardioversionstep-up protocol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Successfully Cardioverted Participants for Each Electrode Position

    After restoration of normal sinus rhythm for 30 seconds and longer by electrical countershock a cardioversion is counted as successful.

    30 seconds after cardioversion

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Mean Number of Cardioversion Shocks

    30 seconds after cardioversion

  • Mean Energy Requirement for Successful Cardioversion

    30 seconds after cardioversion

  • Number of Participants Succesfully Cardioverted With First Shock in Each Electrode Position

    30 seconds after cardioversion

Study Arms (2)

AP Position

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cardioversion with antero-posterior electrode position

Procedure: external electrical cardioversion (with antero-posterior electrode position)

AL Position

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cardioversion with antero-lateral electrode position

Procedure: external electrical cardioversion (with antero-lateral electrode position)

Interventions

external biphasic electrical cardioversion with step-up-protocol of 50-75-100-150-200 Joules if necessary with antero-posterior electrode position until restoration of normal sinus rhythm

Also known as: biphasic cardioversion, countershock treatment
AP Position

external biphasic electrical cardioversion with step-up protocol of 50-75-100-150-200 Joules if necessary with antero-lateral electrode position until restoration of normal sinus rhythm

Also known as: biphasic cardioversion, countershock treatment
AL Position

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • clinical diagnosis of typical atrial flutter
  • signed written informed consent
  • eligibility for sedation and external electrical cardioversion

You may not qualify if:

  • clinical diagnosis of arrhythmia other than typical atrial flutter
  • implanted ICD or pacemaker
  • proof of atrial thrombi

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Heart Center

Hamburg, 20246, Germany

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Kerber RE, Kouba C, Martins J, Kelly K, Low R, Hoyt R, Ferguson D, Bailey L, Bennett P, Charbonnier F. Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks. Circulation. 1984 Aug;70(2):303-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.2.303.

    PMID: 6733884BACKGROUND
  • Kirchhof P, Eckardt L, Loh P, Weber K, Fischer RJ, Seidl KH, Bocker D, Breithardt G, Haverkamp W, Borggrefe M. Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1275-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11315-8.

    PMID: 12414201BACKGROUND
  • Kirchhof P, Borggrefe M, Breithardt G. Effect of electrode position on the outcome of cardioversion. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Sep;7(3):292-6. doi: 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000012399.96959.ab.

    PMID: 14739731BACKGROUND
  • Kerber RE, Jensen SR, Grayzel J, Kennedy J, Hoyt R. Elective cardioversion: influence of paddle-electrode location and size on success rates and energy requirements. N Engl J Med. 1981 Sep 17;305(12):658-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198109173051202.

    PMID: 7266602BACKGROUND
  • Botto GL, Politi A, Bonini W, Broffoni T, Bonatti R. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: role of paddle position on technical efficacy and energy requirements. Heart. 1999 Dec;82(6):726-30. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.6.726.

    PMID: 10573502BACKGROUND
  • Yoon RS, DeMonte TP, Hasanov KF, Jorgenson DB, Joy ML. Measurement of thoracic current flow in pigs for the study of defibrillation and cardioversion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003 Oct;50(10):1167-73. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2003.816082.

    PMID: 14560770BACKGROUND
  • Van Gelder IC, Tuinenburg AE, Schoonderwoerd BS, Tieleman RG, Crijns HJ. Pharmacologic versus direct-current electrical cardioversion of atrial flutter and fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Nov 4;84(9A):147R-151R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00715-8.

    PMID: 10568674BACKGROUND
  • Kerber RE. Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter: standard techniques and new advances. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Oct 17;78(8A):22-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00562-0.

    PMID: 8903272BACKGROUND
  • Camacho MA, Lehr JL, Eisenberg SR. A three-dimensional finite element model of human transthoracic defibrillation: paddle placement and size. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995 Jun;42(6):572-8. doi: 10.1109/10.387196.

    PMID: 7790013BACKGROUND
  • Kirchhof P, Monnig G, Wasmer K, Heinecke A, Breithardt G, Eckardt L, Bocker D. A trial of self-adhesive patch electrodes and hand-held paddle electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (MOBIPAPA). Eur Heart J. 2005 Jul;26(13):1292-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi160. Epub 2005 Feb 25.

    PMID: 15734772BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Flutter

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Tim Risius, MD
Organization
University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Heart Center

Study Officials

  • Stephan Willems, Prof. Dr.

    Oberarzt

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Ltd. Oberarzt des Universitären Herzzentrums Hamburg

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2008

First Posted

March 12, 2009

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion

December 1, 2005

Study Completion

December 1, 2005

Last Updated

August 27, 2015

Results First Posted

March 12, 2009

Record last verified: 2015-08

Locations