Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Use of Prosthesis With Trans-Obturator Way for the Correction of Anterior Prolapse
PERIGEE :Randomized Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Use of Prosthesis With Trans-obturator Way for the Correction of Anterior Prolapse.
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The classical surgical treatment of an anterior prolapse is the use of autologous tissue. In front of the high rate of recurrences with this technique, the use of synthetic prosthesis made their appearance. But the drawback of the use of prosthesis is their tolerability. The system Perigee®, a prosthetic kit by trans-obturator way, was designed to obtain high efficiency in the correction of the prolapse while reducing the risk of complications. The lack of prospective and randomized studies makes difficult to assess the interest. The investigators, therefore, have put in place a randomized prospective study seeking the evaluation of the system Perigee® compared to the conventional surgical technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedMay 28, 2019
November 1, 2013
4.8 years
March 10, 2009
May 23, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Correction of prolapse, which is defined by a stage < II on the classification POP-Q, one year after surgery
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Correction of prolapse 2 years after surgery
24 months
Changes in quality of life, occurrence of complications during surgery, evolution of sexuality, onset or worsening of urinary incontinence
at 3,12, 24 months
Pain after surgery
24 months
Duration of intervention
24 months
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORTraditional surgical method without prosthesis
2
EXPERIMENTALSurgical method with Perigee prosthesis
Interventions
Traditional surgical method without prosthesis (correction of the anterior prolapse through vaginal tract with the use of autologous tissue).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women over 18 years old
- Genital anterior prolapse requiring surgical correction and with stage III or IV in the classification of Pelvic Organ Prolapse - Quantification or POP-Q
- Ability to understand the information and to sign a consent form
- Patients wishing an intervention because of the inconvenience caused by the prolapse.
You may not qualify if:
- Prolapse stage \<III in the classification POP-Q, and prolapse without functional inconvenience
- Progressive or latent infection, or signs of tissue necrosis in the clinical examination
- Troubles resulting in an unacceptable risk of post-surgery complications investigated at the interview with the patient (disorders of blood clotting, immune system disorders, progressive diseases….)
- Mobility of the lower limbs reduced (not permitting the positioning for the surgery)
- Pregnancy or any desire of pregnancy during the study, within two years
- Pelvic surgery in the last 6 months
- Patients who have had radiotherapy of the pelvic area in an irrespective time
- A history of pelvic cancer
- Known hypersensitivity to any component of the prosthesis (polypropylene)
- Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c\> 8%)
- Treatment modifying the immune response (immuno-modulators), current or stopped for less than one month
- Inability to understand the information and to sign a consent
- A person not subject to social security, deprived of freedom, or under legal guardian
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital femme Mère Enfant
Bron, 69677, France
Related Publications (1)
Lamblin G, Van-Nieuwenhuyse A, Chabert P, Lebail-Carval K, Moret S, Mellier G. A randomized controlled trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between vaginal colposuspension and transvaginal mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jul;25(7):961-70. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2344-7. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
PMID: 24573358RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
MELLIER Georges, MD
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2009
First Posted
March 11, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 28, 2019
Record last verified: 2013-11