NCT00859417

Brief Summary

The classical surgical treatment of an anterior prolapse is the use of autologous tissue. In front of the high rate of recurrences with this technique, the use of synthetic prosthesis made their appearance. But the drawback of the use of prosthesis is their tolerability. The system Perigee®, a prosthetic kit by trans-obturator way, was designed to obtain high efficiency in the correction of the prolapse while reducing the risk of complications. The lack of prospective and randomized studies makes difficult to assess the interest. The investigators, therefore, have put in place a randomized prospective study seeking the evaluation of the system Perigee® compared to the conventional surgical technique.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2008

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2008

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 10, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 11, 2009

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

May 28, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

March 10, 2009

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

correction of anterior prolapseprosthetic trans-obturator way kitrandomized study

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Correction of prolapse, which is defined by a stage < II on the classification POP-Q, one year after surgery

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Correction of prolapse 2 years after surgery

    24 months

  • Changes in quality of life, occurrence of complications during surgery, evolution of sexuality, onset or worsening of urinary incontinence

    at 3,12, 24 months

  • Pain after surgery

    24 months

  • Duration of intervention

    24 months

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Traditional surgical method without prosthesis

Procedure: Traditional surgery

2

EXPERIMENTAL

Surgical method with Perigee prosthesis

Device: Perigee® prosthesis

Interventions

Traditional surgical method without prosthesis (correction of the anterior prolapse through vaginal tract with the use of autologous tissue).

1

Surgical method with Perigee® prosthesis

2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women over 18 years old
  • Genital anterior prolapse requiring surgical correction and with stage III or IV in the classification of Pelvic Organ Prolapse - Quantification or POP-Q
  • Ability to understand the information and to sign a consent form
  • Patients wishing an intervention because of the inconvenience caused by the prolapse.

You may not qualify if:

  • Prolapse stage \<III in the classification POP-Q, and prolapse without functional inconvenience
  • Progressive or latent infection, or signs of tissue necrosis in the clinical examination
  • Troubles resulting in an unacceptable risk of post-surgery complications investigated at the interview with the patient (disorders of blood clotting, immune system disorders, progressive diseases….)
  • Mobility of the lower limbs reduced (not permitting the positioning for the surgery)
  • Pregnancy or any desire of pregnancy during the study, within two years
  • Pelvic surgery in the last 6 months
  • Patients who have had radiotherapy of the pelvic area in an irrespective time
  • A history of pelvic cancer
  • Known hypersensitivity to any component of the prosthesis (polypropylene)
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c\> 8%)
  • Treatment modifying the immune response (immuno-modulators), current or stopped for less than one month
  • Inability to understand the information and to sign a consent
  • A person not subject to social security, deprived of freedom, or under legal guardian

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hôpital femme Mère Enfant

Bron, 69677, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Lamblin G, Van-Nieuwenhuyse A, Chabert P, Lebail-Carval K, Moret S, Mellier G. A randomized controlled trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between vaginal colposuspension and transvaginal mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jul;25(7):961-70. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2344-7. Epub 2014 Feb 27.

Study Officials

  • MELLIER Georges, MD

    Hospices Civils de Lyon

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2009

First Posted

March 11, 2009

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2013

Study Completion

July 1, 2013

Last Updated

May 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2013-11

Locations