Cemented vs Non-cemented Semiendoprosthesis in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Non-cemented Semiendoprostheses in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The hip semiendoprosthesis is an acceptable method to treat the proximal femoral fractures. Traditionally, the cemented version of the semiendoprosthesis has been used for this indication. However, the cementing carries a risk of fat embolism during the pressurization of the cement. The fat embolism can be avoided when using the non-cemented semiendoprosthesis. In this study we want to find out whether there are any differences in the treatment results between the cemented and non-cemented semiendoprostheses when treating the proximal femoral fractures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedApril 7, 2015
April 1, 2015
6.2 years
March 10, 2009
April 3, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary mortality
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Prosthetic complications
1 year
Study Arms (2)
1 - cemented
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are treated with a cemented semiendoprosthesis
2 - non-cemented
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are treated with a non-cemented semiendoprosthesis
Interventions
Application of a cemented semiendoprosthesis (Basis, Smith \& Nephew)
Patients are treated with a non-cemented semiendoprosthesis (Biomet Taperloc, Biomet Inc.)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A proximal femoral fracture
You may not qualify if:
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Pathologic fracture
- Severe dementia (preventing the informed consent)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Central Hospital of North Carelia
Joensuu, 80200, Finland
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, 70100, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2009
First Posted
March 11, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 7, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04