Study to Evaluate the Analgesic Efficacy of 28 Days' Oral Administration of AZD2066 Compared With Placebo in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
A Phase IIa, Double-Blind, Randomised, Parallel-Group, Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate the Analgesic Efficacy of 28 Days' Oral Administration of AZD2066 Compared With Placebo in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
1 other identifier
interventional
127
1 country
19
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate if AZD2066 can relieve the pain arising from painful diabetic neuropathy compared to placebo.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 pain
Started Feb 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 pain
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 29, 2012
CompletedNovember 12, 2012
November 1, 2012
6 months
February 27, 2009
September 28, 2012
November 8, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Mean Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Last 5 Days of Treatment
Change of mean pain intensity from 5-day baseline to the last 5 days of treatment, measured twice daily with NRS (12 hours recall). Mean pain intensity for 5-day baseline period (evening Day -6 to moning Day-1) and mean pain intensity for last 5 days on treatment (ie, last dose day and the 4 preceding calendar days) was calculated based on the numerical rating scale (NRS)(0-10). 0=No pain, 10=Worst pain imaginable.
From baseline to day 28
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores and Change From Baseline Over Time to Day 28.
From baseline to 28 days
Number of Patients With >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Intensity Score at Day 28
28 days
Number of Patients With >=50% Reduction From Baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Intensity Score at Day 28
28 days
Number of Patients With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score of at Least "Much Improved" at Day 28.
28 days
Change in McGill Pain Questionnaire Short Form (MPQ-SF) Sensory Index From Baseline to Day 28.
From baseline to day 28.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTAL2
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
- Clinical diagnosis of painful diabetic neuropathy.
- non-fertile females
You may not qualify if:
- Other pain that may confound assessment of neuropathic pain.
- Ongoing significant peripheral arterial diseases, skin ulcers, or amputation in the lower extremities.
- History of psychotic disorders among first degree relatives.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (19)
Reserach Site
Bella Vista, Arkansas, United States
Research Site
National City, California, United States
Research Site
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Research Site
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Research Site
DeLand, Florida, United States
Research Site
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States
Research Site
Miami, Florida, United States
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
Research Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Research Site
Madisonville, Kentucky, United States
Research Site
Owing Mills, Maryland, United States
Research Site
Bingham Farms, Michigan, United States
Research Site
Willingboro, New Jersey, United States
Reasearch Site
Albany, New York, United States
Research Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Research Site
Indiana, Pennsylvania, United States
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Research Site
Houston, Texas, United States
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gerard Lynch
- Organization
- AstraZeneca
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Biljana Lilja
AstraZeneca R&D Södertälje151 85 Södertälje, Sweden
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles E Argoff, MD
Albany Medical , NY 12208, USA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2009
First Posted
March 6, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 12, 2012
Results First Posted
October 29, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11