Efficacy and Safety Study of Prophylactic Versus On-Demand Treatment With Feiba NF in Subjects With Hemophilia A or B and a High Titer Inhibitor
FEIBA NF: A Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Parallel Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Versus On-Demand Treatment in Subjects With Hemophilia A or B and a High Titer Inhibitor
2 other identifiers
interventional
52
10 countries
17
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study was to determine the efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life benefits with FEIBA NF prophylactic treatment as compared with on-demand treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Mar 2009
Typical duration for phase_3
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 31, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 17, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 17, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 14, 2014
CompletedMay 19, 2021
April 1, 2021
3.6 years
February 25, 2009
January 30, 2014
April 29, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction in Annualized Bleeding Episode Rate (ABR) Among Participants Receiving Prophylactic Treatment as Compared to Those Treated On-demand
Participants were Randomized to Receive 1 of the 2 Following Treatment Regimens: 1.On-Demand: FEIBA NF dose \& dosing interval as prescribed by treating physician 2.Prophylaxis: 85 ± 15 U/kg of FEIBA NF every other day during 12-month prophylactic period Annualized rate of bleeding episodes was calculated as: (Number of bleeding episodes/observed treatment period in days) \* 365.25
12 months ± 14 days
Secondary Outcomes (42)
Annualized Bleeding Rate by Treatment Regimen, Bleeding Etiology, and Bleed Type
12 months ± 14 days
Differences in Mean Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate Between On-Demand and Prophylaxis Treatment Regimens by Bleeding Etiology, and Bleeding Type
12 months ± 14 days
Annualized Bleeding Rate for New Target Joints
12 months ± 14 days
Differences in Mean Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate Between On-Demand and Prophylaxis Treatment Regimens: New Target Joints
12 months ± 14 days
Number of New Target Joints
12 months ± 14 days
- +37 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Prophylaxis arm
EXPERIMENTALOn-demand arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
85 ± 15 U/kg of FEIBA NF every other day during the 12-month prophylactic period
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed and dated informed consent form by the participant or the participant's legally authorized representative
- The participant is ≥ 4 to ≤ 65 years of age
- The participant has a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 60
- Hemophilia A and B of any severity, with documented history of high-titer inhibitor (\> 5 Bethesda unit (BU)) for at least 12 months; or, if inhibitor titer is ≤ 5 BU, and the participant is refractory with increased dosing of either factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX), as demonstrated from the participant's medical history
- Currently being treated on an on-demand basis for treatment of bleeding episodes
- Adequate venous access, with or without central venous device
- ≥ 12 bleeding episodes requiring treatment with by-passing agents in the past 12 months, based on medical history
- Competent in-home treatment and infusion therapy
- Currently using bypassing agents (activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa)) for treatment of bleeding episodes
- HCV-, either by antibody testing or polymerase chain reaction (PCR); or HCV+ with stable hepatic disease
- HIV-, or HIV+ with stable disease and CD4 count \> 200 cells/mm3 at screening
- Female participant of childbearing potential, presents with a negative serum pregnancy test, and agrees to employ adequate birth control measures for the duration of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving immune tolerance induction (ITI)
- Currently on regular prophylactic therapy to prevent bleeding episodes
- Clinically symptomatic liver disease (e.g. diagnosis of cirrhosis \[confirmed by liver biopsy\], portal vein hypertension, ascites, prothrombin time (PT) 5 seconds above upper limit of normal)
- Platelet count \< 100,000/ml
- Planned elective surgery during participation in this study
- Participant is currently participating in another clinical study and has received an investigational product or device within 30 days prior to study entry
- Planned use of pegylated or non-pegylated alpha-interferon with or without ribavirin for HCV infected participants or planned use of a protease inhibitor for HIV infected participants. Participants currently taking any of these medications for a 30-day course are eligible.
- Clinically significant increase in D-dimer levels from historical baseline and/or associated with chronic liver disease or clinically evident thromboembolic event
- Known hypersensitivity to anti-inhibitor coagulant complexes (AICCs)
- Currently treated with a systemic immunomodulating drug
- Prior history of thromboembolic event: acute myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism
- Diagnosis of advanced atherosclerosis, malignancy and/or other diseases that may increase the participant's risk of thromboembolic complications
- Clinically significant medical, psychiatric, or cognitive illness, or recreational drug/alcohol use that, in the opinion of the investigator, would affect participant safety or compliance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (17)
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Zagreb, Croatia
Unknown Facility
Kanagawa, Japan
Unknown Facility
Nara, Japan
Unknown Facility
Wellington, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, Romania
Unknown Facility
Timișoara, Romania
Unknown Facility
Kirov, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Yekaterinburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Lviv, Ukraine
Related Publications (1)
Antunes SV, Tangada S, Stasyshyn O, Mamonov V, Phillips J, Guzman-Becerra N, Grigorian A, Ewenstein B, Wong WY. Randomized comparison of prophylaxis and on-demand regimens with FEIBA NF in the treatment of haemophilia A and B with inhibitors. Haemophilia. 2014 Jan;20(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/hae.12246. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
PMID: 23910578RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Shire
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2009
First Posted
February 26, 2009
Study Start
March 31, 2009
Primary Completion
October 17, 2012
Study Completion
October 17, 2012
Last Updated
May 19, 2021
Results First Posted
March 14, 2014
Record last verified: 2021-04