Does Threshold IMT Influence Weaning?
Is Threshold IMT Useful To Accelerate Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation?
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients under threshold IMT show better conditions to weaning from mechanical ventilation than the control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2004
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2009
CompletedMarch 6, 2009
February 1, 2009
7 months
February 9, 2009
March 5, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Weaning Acceleration
Time weaning measured in hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Strenght and ventilatory variables
Time weaning measured in hours
Study Arms (2)
IMT Group
EXPERIMENTALThe IMT group was trained using the threshold IMT device with a 40% MIP load. Each training session consisted of 5 sets with 10 breaths, twice a day
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients were evaluated until weaning without interventions
Interventions
The IMT group was trained using the threshold IMT device with a 40% MIP load. Each training session consisted of 5 sets with 10 breaths, twice a day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients included in this study were under MV for more than 48 hours of CMV and ventilated with pressure support ventilation (PSV) between 12 and 15 cmH2O, with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) between 5 and 7 cmH2O, hemodynamically stable without vasoactive drugs (dopamine, dobutamine or norepinephrine) or sedative agents.
You may not qualify if:
- This study excluded hypotensive patients (systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg or mean blood pressure \< 70 mmHg), severe intracranial disease and sensory reduction, barotrauma, tracheotomy, neuromuscular disease and the use of vasoactive drugs or sedatives.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903, Brazil
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Silvia Vieira, PhD
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2009
First Posted
February 26, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2004
Primary Completion
March 1, 2005
Study Completion
July 1, 2007
Last Updated
March 6, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-02