NCT00847106

Brief Summary

Dendritic cells (DC) are the professional antigen presenting cells of the immune system. Multiple distinct DC lineage's exist and it is now well appreciated that the DC subset and the maturation stage of the DC determines the type of immune response, ranging from a TH1 or TH2 response to immune tolerance. The extremely potent capacity of mature DC to initiate immune responses can be exploited to fight infectious diseases and cancer. Others and we are currently using tumor antigen loaded mature DC in clinical vaccination studies against cancer, and clinical as well as immunological responses have been observed. Exciting new insights accompany the revival of suppressor T cells, now referred to as regulatory T cells (Treg), and implicate that also Treg play a key role in the control of immunity. Treg constitute a sub-population of CD4+ T cells constitutively expressing the IL-2R alpha-chain (CD25). Treg show remarkably suppressive activities on different components of the immune system, including T lymphocytes and dendritic cells, suggesting they act both at the initiation phase (DC) and at the effector phase (activated T cells) of the immune response. Interestingly, temporal depletion of Treg has been shown to enhance anti-tumor immune responses and in case of prolonged absence of Treg even autoimmunity. Furthermore, data in mouse tumor models indicate that temporal depletion of Treg also results in improved vaccine efficiency in the therapeutic setting, e.g. in mice with a pre-existing tumor. These data imply that in tumor bearing patients depletion of Treg prior to vaccination will improve vaccine efficacy. In this study we investigate the effect of regulatory T cell (Treg) depletion on the efficacy of DC-based anti-tumor vaccines in a clinical study using melanoma associated antigens tyrosinase and gp100-loaded DC and a depleting anti-CD25 mononuclear antibody (Daclizumab). Our primary objective in this study is the induction of an effective anti-tumor immune response. Our secondary objective is the induction of a clinical response.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2004

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2004

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2005

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2005

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 18, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 19, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

February 19, 2009

Status Verified

February 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

February 18, 2009

Last Update Submit

February 18, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

Dendritic CellsRegulatory T cellsCD25MelanomaImmunotherapyDaclizumabStage IV Melanoma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Immune reponse

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical Response

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Histologically documented evidence of melanoma.
  • Stage IV melanoma according to the 2001 AJCC criteria. \[53\] Limited tumor burden; LDH \< 2x upper limit of normal.
  • HLA-A2.1 phenotype according to lymphocyte HLA typing.
  • Expression of gp100 and/or tyrosinase on melanoma cells, as detected by immunohistochemistry, preferably on metastatic tumor, but if not available on primary tumor.
  • ECOG performance status 0-1, life expectancy \> 3 months.
  • Age 18-75 years. -
  • Written informed consent.
  • Expected adequacy of follow-up.
  • WBC \> 3.0 x 109/l, lymphocytes \> 0.8 x 109/l, platelets \> 100 x 109/l, serum creatinine \< 150 μmol/l, serum bilirubin \< 25 μmol/l.

You may not qualify if:

  • No clinical signs of CNS metastases, in patients with a clinical suspicion of CNS metastases CT scan of the brain should be performed to exclude this.
  • No prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy within three months before planned vaccination is allowed.
  • No previous treatment with monoclonal antibodies.
  • No concomitant use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents.
  • No history of second malignancy within the last 5 years. Adequately treated basal carcinoma of skin or carcinoma in situ of cervix is acceptable within this period.
  • No serious concomitant disease, no active infections. Specifically, patients with autoimmune disease or organ allografts, and HBsAg or HIV positive patients are excluded.
  • Patients with a known allergy to shell fish (contains KLH) are excluded.
  • Patients with asthma or severe allergic disease necessitating medication are excluded
  • No pregnant or lactating women.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (8)

  • Sutmuller RP, van Duivenvoorde LM, van Elsas A, Schumacher TN, Wildenberg ME, Allison JP, Toes RE, Offringa R, Melief CJ. Synergism of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade and depletion of CD25(+) regulatory T cells in antitumor therapy reveals alternative pathways for suppression of autoreactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. J Exp Med. 2001 Sep 17;194(6):823-32. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.6.823.

    PMID: 11560997BACKGROUND
  • de Vries IJ, Bernsen MR, Lesterhuis WJ, Scharenborg NM, Strijk SP, Gerritsen MJ, Ruiter DJ, Figdor CG, Punt CJ, Adema GJ. Immunomonitoring tumor-specific T cells in delayed-type hypersensitivity skin biopsies after dendritic cell vaccination correlates with clinical outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5779-87. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.478.

    PMID: 16110035BACKGROUND
  • De Vries IJ, Krooshoop DJ, Scharenborg NM, Lesterhuis WJ, Diepstra JH, Van Muijen GN, Strijk SP, Ruers TJ, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ, Adema GJ, Punt CJ, Figdor CG. Effective migration of antigen-pulsed dendritic cells to lymph nodes in melanoma patients is determined by their maturation state. Cancer Res. 2003 Jan 1;63(1):12-7.

    PMID: 12517769BACKGROUND
  • Lesterhuis WJ, de Vries IJ, Adema GJ, Punt CJ. Dendritic cell-based vaccines in cancer immunotherapy: an update on clinical and immunological results. Ann Oncol. 2004;15 Suppl 4:iv145-51. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh919. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15477299BACKGROUND
  • Figdor CG, de Vries IJ, Lesterhuis WJ, Melief CJ. Dendritic cell immunotherapy: mapping the way. Nat Med. 2004 May;10(5):475-80. doi: 10.1038/nm1039.

    PMID: 15122249BACKGROUND
  • de Vries IJ, Lesterhuis WJ, Scharenborg NM, Engelen LP, Ruiter DJ, Gerritsen MJ, Croockewit S, Britten CM, Torensma R, Adema GJ, Figdor CG, Punt CJ. Maturation of dendritic cells is a prerequisite for inducing immune responses in advanced melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Nov 1;9(14):5091-100.

    PMID: 14613986BACKGROUND
  • de Vries IJ, Eggert AA, Scharenborg NM, Vissers JL, Lesterhuis WJ, Boerman OC, Punt CJ, Adema GJ, Figdor CG. Phenotypical and functional characterization of clinical grade dendritic cells. J Immunother. 2002 Sep-Oct;25(5):429-38. doi: 10.1097/00002371-200209000-00007.

    PMID: 12218781BACKGROUND
  • Adema GJ, de Vries IJ, Punt CJ, Figdor CG. Migration of dendritic cell based cancer vaccines: in vivo veritas? Curr Opin Immunol. 2005 Apr;17(2):170-4. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2005.01.004.

    PMID: 15766677BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Melanoma

Interventions

Daclizumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neuroendocrine TumorsNeuroectodermal TumorsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Nerve TissueNevi and MelanomasSkin NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Study Officials

  • Prof. C.J.A. Punt, MD, PhD

    Radboud University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Prof. G.J. Adema, PhD

    Radboud University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2009

First Posted

February 19, 2009

Study Start

March 1, 2004

Primary Completion

October 1, 2005

Study Completion

October 1, 2005

Last Updated

February 19, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-02