Subcutaneous Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Gel for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
Efficacy and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Gel for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
1 other identifier
interventional
683
5 countries
14
Brief Summary
Prospective, open, randomised, parallel, multicentre, two arm trial comparing a new form of luteal support (S.C.) to an approved comparator (vaginal gel).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jan 2009
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 26, 2012
CompletedJanuary 31, 2013
January 1, 2013
1.8 years
January 22, 2009
November 26, 2012
January 28, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate at the End of the Study
10 weeks after treatment start
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Delivery Rate and Live Birth Rate
nearly 9 month after treatment start
Implantation Rate
Four to five weeks after oocytes retrieval
Study Arms (2)
Progesterone SC
EXPERIMENTALProgesterone Vaginal gel
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18- 42 (upon starting COH);
- BMI \<30 kg/m2;
- \<3 prior ART cycles (IVF, ICSI and related procedures);
- Baseline (day 2-3 of cycling) FSH \<15 IU/L and E2 \<80 pg/mL;
- Normal uterine cavity as per recent hysterosalpingogram, sonohysterogram or hysteroscopic exam (i.e. no polyp or protruding sub-mucosal fibroid);
- At least 3 retrieved oocytes;
- Patient has given written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Intramural uterine fibroids that distort the uterine cavity or polyps \>1 cm;
- Stage III or IV endometriosis (endometriomas);
- Hydrosalpinx;
- History of past poor response to COH resulting in canceling ART;
- Use of thawed/donated oocytes;
- Use of thawed/donated embryos;
- Patients affected by pathologies associated with any contraindication of being pregnant;
- Hypersensitivity to study medication;
- Uncontrolled adrenal or thyroid dysfunction;
- Undiagnosed vaginal bleeding;
- History of arterial disease;
- Patients with hepatic impairment;
- Neoplasias (current) or history of neoplasia that may be responsive to progesterone;
- High grade cervical dysplasia;
- Active thrombophlebitis or thromboembolic disorders, or a history of hormone-associated thrombophlebitis or thromboembolic disorders;
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
Klinik fur Frauenheilkunde und Geburthilfe - Universistät zu Lübeck
Lübeck, 23538, Germany
First Dept. Obstetric and Gynaecology, Semmelweiss University Faculty of Medicine
Budapest, 1088, Hungary
Unità Ospedaliera di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Ospedale Civico Brunico
Bruneck, Bolzano, 39031, Italy
Istituto Scientifico Universitario San Raffaele
Milan, Milan, 20132, Italy
Università degli Studi di Napoli 'Federico II
Naples, Naples, 80131, Italy
Clinica Mangiagalli, Università di Milano
Milan, 20122, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero-Sanitaria di Modena
Modena, 41100, Italy
Ospedale Santa Chiara, Università degli studi di Pisa
Pisa, 56100, Italy
IIRM SA
Sorengo, Canton Ticino, 6924, Switzerland
Universitätsfrauenklinik Basel
Basel, 4031, Switzerland
Midland Fertility Services
Aldridge, West Midlands, WS9 8LT, United Kingdom
St. Bartholomew's Hospital - Center for Reproductive Medicine
London, EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital - Women's Health Department
London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
The Bridge Center
London, SE1 9RY, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Griesinger G, Trevisan S, Cometti B. Endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer is a poor predictor of IVF treatment outcome. Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Jan 29;2018(1):hox031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox031. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30895243DERIVEDLockwood G, Griesinger G, Cometti B; 13 European Centers. Subcutaneous progesterone versus vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: a noninferiority randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):112-119.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
PMID: 24140033DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
no special limitations of the trial were detected.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical trial manager
- Organization
- IBSA Institut biochimique
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2009
First Posted
January 23, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
May 1, 2011
Last Updated
January 31, 2013
Results First Posted
December 26, 2012
Record last verified: 2013-01