Comparison of 2.0 mg/kg Sugammadex and Neostigmine at Reappearance of T2 in Chinese and European Subjects (Study 19.4.324)(P05768AM1)(COMPLETED)
A Multi-center, Randomized, Parallel-group, Active-controlled, Safety-assessor Blinded Trial, Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 2.0 mg.Kg-1 Sugammadex With 50 μg.Kg-1 Neostigmine Administered at Reappearance of T2 After Rocuronium in Chinese and European ASA I-III Subjects Undergoing Elective Surgery Under Propofol Anesthesia
2 other identifiers
interventional
308
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The present trial was set up to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex compared to neostigmine administered at reappearance of T2 in Chinese and Caucasian subjects for registration purposes in China.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jan 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 18, 2011
CompletedNovember 2, 2015
October 1, 2015
8 months
January 15, 2009
July 22, 2011
October 30, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time From Start of Administration of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9.
Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive train of four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds and assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. Nerve stimulation was to continue until the ratio of the magnitude of the fourth twitch (T4) to first twitch (T1) reached \>= 0.9. The greater the T4/T1 ratio the greater the recovery from neuromuscular blockade, with a value of 1.0 representing full recovery. The primary analysis was the comparison between sugammadex \& neostigmine among Chinese subjects; other comparisons were secondary.
start of administration of sugammadex/neostigmine to recovery from neuromuscular blockade
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7 and 0.8.
start of administration of sugammadex/neostigmine to recovery from neuromuscular blockade
Study Arms (4)
Sugammadex in Caucasian Subjects
EXPERIMENTALAt reappearance of T2 after the last dose of rocuronium, 2.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex was administered.
Neostigmine in Caucasian Subjects
ACTIVE COMPARATORAt reappearance of T2 after the last dose of rocuronium, 50 μg.kg-1 neostigmine (combined with 10-20 μg.kg-1 atropine, in a ratio ranging from 2.5:1 to 5:1) was administered.
Sugammadex in Chinese Subjects
EXPERIMENTALAt reappearance of T2 after the last dose of rocuronium, 2.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex was administered.
Neostigmine in Chinese Subjects
ACTIVE COMPARATORAt reappearance of T2 after the last dose of rocuronium, 50 μg.kg-1 neostigmine (combined with 10-20 μg.kg-1 atropine, in a ratio ranging from 2.5:1 to 5:1) was administered.
Interventions
After induction of anesthesia an intubation dose of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium was administered. Maintenance doses of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg rocuronium intravenous (IV) could be administered if necessary. At reappearance of T2 after the last administration of rocuronium, an IV single bolus dose of 2.0 mg/kg sugammadex was administered.
After induction of anesthesia an intubation dose of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium was administered. Maintenance doses of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg rocuronium IV could be administered if necessary. At reappearance of T2 after the last administration of rocuronium, an IV single bolus dose of 50 µg/kg neostigmine (combined with 10-20 μg.kg-1 atropine, in a ratio ranging from 2.5:1 to 5:1) was administered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who are willing to provide informed consent; be between 18 and 64 years old; are American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) class 1-3 (extremes included); scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, allowing stable neuromuscular monitoring, which requires neuromuscular blockade using rocuronium; be compliant with the dose/visit schedules, and use an accepted method of contraception (if applicable).
- For China only: Subjects of Chinese descent born in China, never emigrated out of China and have a Chinese home address. For Europe only: Subjects of Caucasian descent born in Europe, never emigrated out of Europe and have a European home address.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with expected difficult intubation, neuromuscular disorders affecting neuromuscular blockade, significant renal/hepatic dysfunction, use of a tourniquet, (family) history of malignant hyperthermia, allergy to general anesthesia medications, contraindication to study drugs, breast feeding, pregnant, participation in previous or new trials, a clinically significant condition that may interfere with the trial, or membership in the (family of) study/sponsor staff.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Wu X, Oerding H, Liu J, Vanacker B, Yao S, Dahl V, Xiong L, Claudius C, Yue Y, Huang Y, Abels E, Rietbergen H, Woo T. Rocuronium blockade reversal with sugammadex vs. neostigmine: randomized study in Chinese and Caucasian subjects. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul 12;14:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-53. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25187755RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2009
First Posted
January 21, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Study Completion
September 1, 2010
Last Updated
November 2, 2015
Results First Posted
August 18, 2011
Record last verified: 2015-10