NCT00724932

Brief Summary

The current trial was designed to demonstrate faster recovery from a neuromuscular blockade (NMB) induced by rocuronium after reversal at 1-2 Post Tetanic Count (PTC) by 4.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex compared to 50 µg.kg-1 neostigmine at reappearance of second twitch (T2) in participants undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or appendectomy under propofol anesthesia, to compare safety and to evaluate operating room and Post Anesthetic Care Unit (PACU) length of stay.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2008

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 16, 2008

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 28, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 30, 2008

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2009

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 3, 2009

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 29, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

May 16, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

July 28, 2008

Results QC Date

March 14, 2013

Last Update Submit

April 12, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time From Start of Administration of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP, Sugammadex or Neostigmine) to Recovery of the Fourth Twitch/First Twitch (T4/T1) Ratio to 0.9

    Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive Train-Of-Four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds \& assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 and T4 refer to the magnitudes (heights) of the first and fourth twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from neuromuscular blockade (NMB). In this study, twitch responses were recorded until the T4/T1 Ratio reached \>= 0.9, the minimum acceptable ratio that indicated recovery from NMB. A faster time to recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9 indicates a faster recovery from NMB.

    From start of IMP administration to recovery of T4/T1 ratio to 0.9 (ranging from ~2 minutes to ~9 minutes)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7

    From start of IMP administration to recovery of T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7 (ranging from ~2 minutes to ~5 minutes)

  • Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.8

    From start of IMP administration to recovery of T4/T1 Ratio to 0.8 (ranging from ~2 minutes to ~6 minutes)

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Pre-treatment Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Post-treatment SAEs

    From signing of informed consent to end of trial (7 days after surgery)

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Pre-treatment Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Post-treatment Non-serious AEs

    From signing of informed consent to end of trial (7 days after surgery)

Other Outcomes (29)

  • Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.5 and 0.6

    From start of IMP administration to recovery of T4/T1 Ratio to 0.5 and 0.6 (ranging from ~1 minute to ~4 minutes)

  • Time From Start of Administration of the Last Dose of Rocuronium to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9

    From start of last dose of rocuronium to recovery of T4/T1 Ratio to 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9 (ranging from ~12 minutes to ~36 minutes)

  • Time From Start of Administration of the Last Dose of Rocuronium to the Time of 1-2 PTC in the 4.0 mg.Kg-1 Sugammadex Group

    From last dose of rocuronium to 1-2 PTC (up to ~9 minutes)

  • +26 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Sugammadex

EXPERIMENTAL

4.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex at 1-2 PTC

Drug: RocuroniumDrug: Sugammadex

Neostigmine

EXPERIMENTAL

50 µg.kg-1 neostigmine (with atropine in a ratio of 5:1 for neostigmine:atropine) at reappearance of T2

Drug: RocuroniumDrug: NeostigmineDrug: Atropine

Interventions

Participants will receive an intravenous (i.v.) single bolus dose of 0.6 mg.kg-1 rocuronium. After this dose, maintenance doses of 0.1-0.2 mg.kg-1 rocuronium may be given.

Also known as: rocuronium bromide, Esmeron®
NeostigmineSugammadex

After the last dose of rocuronium has been administered, participants will receive, according to the randomization, a single bolus dose of 4.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex at 1-2 PTC.

Also known as: Org 25969, SCH 900616, MK-8616, Bridion®
Sugammadex

After the last dose of rocuronium has been administered, participants will receive, according to the randomization, 50 μg.kg-1 neostigmine (with atropine in a ratio of 5:1 for neostigmine:atropine) at reappearance of T2.

Also known as: Prostigmin®
Neostigmine

After the last dose of rocuronium has been administered, participants will receive, according to randomization, 10 μg.kg-1 atropine (with neostigmine in a ratio of 5:1 for neostigmine:atropine) at reappearance of T2.

Also known as: atropine sulfate
Neostigmine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants of American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1-3
  • Participants of age above or equal to the age of 18 years
  • Participants who are scheduled to undergo a laparoscopic cholecystectomy or appendectomy under general anesthesia requiring neuromuscular relaxation with rocuronium, and if applicable, maintenance of neuromuscular blockade
  • Participants who have given written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants in whom a difficult intubation because of anatomical malformations is expected
  • Participants known or suspected to have neuromuscular disorders affecting NMB
  • Participants known or suspected to have a significant renal dysfunction
  • Participants known or suspected to have a severe hepatic dysfunction
  • Participants known or suspected to have (family) history of malignant hyperthermia
  • Participants known or suspected to have an allergy to opioids, muscle relaxants or other medication used during general anesthesia
  • Participants in whom the use of neostigmine and/or atropine is contraindicated
  • Female participants who are pregnant (pregnancy will be excluded for women both from medical history and by a human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test within 24h before surgery, except for women who are not of childbearing potential, i.e. at least 2 years menopausal or have undergone tubal ligation or a hysterectomy)
  • Female participants who are breast-feeding
  • Participants who participated in another clinical trial not pre-approved by the sponsor, within 30 days of entering into trial 19.4.318 (P05699)
  • Participants who have already participated in a sugammadex trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • Suresh D, Carter JA, Whitehead JP, Goldhill DR, Flynn PJ. Cardiovascular changes at antagonism of atracurium. Effects of different doses of premixed neostigmine and glycopyrronium in a ratio of 5:1. Anaesthesia. 1991 Oct;46(10):877-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09609.x.

    PMID: 1952007BACKGROUND
  • Caldwell JE. Reversal of residual neuromuscular block with neostigmine at one to four hours after a single intubating dose of vecuronium. Anesth Analg. 1995 Jun;80(6):1168-74. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199506000-00018.

    PMID: 7762847BACKGROUND
  • Irie T, Uekama K. Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins. III. Toxicological issues and safety evaluation. J Pharm Sci. 1997 Feb;86(2):147-62. doi: 10.1021/js960213f.

    PMID: 9040088BACKGROUND
  • Apfel CC, Kranke P, Eberhart LH, Roos A, Roewer N. Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Feb;88(2):234-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.2.234.

    PMID: 11883387BACKGROUND
  • Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999 Sep;91(3):693-700. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022.

    PMID: 10485781BACKGROUND
  • Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg. 1970 Nov-Dec;49(6):924-34. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5534693BACKGROUND
  • Geldner G, Niskanen M, Laurila P, Mizikov V, Hubler M, Beck G, Rietbergen H, Nicolayenko E. A randomised controlled trial comparing sugammadex and neostigmine at different depths of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2012 Sep;67(9):991-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07197.x. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

RocuroniumSugammadexNeostigmineAtropine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AndrostanolsAndrostanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic Compoundsgamma-CyclodextrinsCyclodextrinsMacrocyclic CompoundsDextrinsStarchGlucansPolysaccharidesCarbohydratesPhenylammonium CompoundsQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsAminesOrganic ChemicalsOnium CompoundsAtropine DerivativesTropanesAzabicyclo CompoundsAza CompoundsBelladonna AlkaloidsSolanaceous AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Organization
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2008

First Posted

July 30, 2008

Study Start

July 16, 2008

Primary Completion

April 1, 2009

Study Completion

May 3, 2009

Last Updated

May 16, 2017

Results First Posted

April 29, 2013

Record last verified: 2017-04