Outcome Following Phacoemulsification Versus Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS)
Comparison of Phacoemulsification Versus Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) : A Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
420
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypothesis : Phacoemulsification is superior to SICS with regards to:
- Immediate unaided high and low contrast visual performance
- Its impact on quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2010
CompletedMay 19, 2010
May 1, 2010
1.2 years
January 9, 2009
May 18, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
immediate unaided and aided visual acuity
immediate and mid term (12 months)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Assessment of unaided and aided low contrast sensitivity
3 and 12 months
Intra-operative complications immediate post-operative day corneal edema anterior chamber inflammation
day 1, 1 week
To assess improvement in quality of life
3 and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
manual small incision cataract surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORsurgical intervention by small incision cataract surgery
phacoemulsification
OTHERsurgical intervention by phacoemulsification
Interventions
SICS with rigid IOL implantation Phaco with foldable IOL implantation
cataract surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Prospective subjects should be diagnosed with senile cataract. Subject must require extraction of cataract in one eye followed by implantation of an AcrySof (SN60WF) or PMMA (MZ60BD) posterior chamber intraocular lens.
- Pupil dilation equal or greater to 7 mm after mydriasis.
- Patients undergoing cataract surgery for the first eye.
- Visual prognosis equal or greater to 6/12.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with history of ocular pathology, glaucoma, uveitis, high myopia, PEX, or corneal pathology.
- Patients with traumatic, subluxated and posterior polar cataract.
- Patients who had previously ocular surgery in the past 6 months prior to the screening visit.
- Patients with diabetic retinopathy.
- Patients who are not suitable for follow-up visits.
- Patients with Fuchs' Dystrophy, Macular Degeneration, Ocular Surface Disease that will interfere with normal recovery.
- Any patients with significant intra-operative complications will be removed from the overall analysis of the results. All patient data should still be recorded, even if from the "excluded" patient group.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
S. K. Red Cross Eye Hospital,
Dholka, Gujarat, India
Related Publications (2)
Gogate P, Deshpande M, Nirmalan PK. Why do phacoemulsification? Manual small-incision cataract surgery is almost as effective, but less expensive. Ophthalmology. 2007 May;114(5):965-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.057. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
PMID: 17296230RESULTRuit S, Tabin G, Chang D, Bajracharya L, Kline DC, Richheimer W, Shrestha M, Paudyal G. A prospective randomized clinical trial of phacoemulsification vs manual sutureless small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;143(1):32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.023. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
PMID: 17188040RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alpesh R Shah, Dr
Iladevi Cataract and IOL Research Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2009
First Posted
January 13, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2010
Study Completion
May 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 19, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-05