UVB Light and Sunscreen
Sunscreen
3% Dihydroxyacetone (DHA or Sunless Tanning Agent) Inhibits Vitamin D Production in the Skin in Response to Ultraviolet Light
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients need vitamin D which is normally produced in the skin in response to ultraviolet light from the sun. Vitamin D is important for calcium absorption and good bone health. Physicians have been using sunscreens to protect patients from skin cancer and the aging effects of sunlight for a least a half a century. Dermatologists have promoted sunscreen use to restrict sunlight exposure especially in white Caucasians. If this behavior is done 100% of the time when outdoors individuals may suffer from vitamin D deficiency. It is impossible to influence persons' behavior to wear sunscreens all the time when outdoors. With the use of sunless tanning agent (DHA), once a week, we can obtain a continuous sunscreen in the top layer of the skin that will not wash off, can't be removed with soap and water, or removed by perspiration. Under these circumstances we can answer the scientific question, will sunscreen use inhibit the production of vitamin D in the skin?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started May 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2009
CompletedDecember 1, 2009
November 1, 2009
9 months
January 6, 2009
November 27, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To measure the response of 25(OH)D to 40 milliJoules of UV-B light in white Caucasians with melanoidins-sunscreen from 3% DHA in comparison to the response of control subjects who have not used 3% DHA.
1 month
Study Arms (2)
Tanning spray
EXPERIMENTALTo characterize the 25(OH)D response to 4 weeks of thrice weekly 40 mJ of UV-B light in a group of normal subjects with skin types I and II while using multiple applications of 3% DHA for five weeks.
UVB
ACTIVE COMPARATORTo characterize the 25(OH)D response to 4 weeks of thrice weekly 40 mJ of UV-B light in a control group of normal subjects with skin types I and II who are not using 3% DHA applications.
Interventions
using 3% DHA twice a week for the 1st week and then once a week for 4 weeks and receiving 40mJ UV-B phototherapy three times a week for four weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- males or females
- ages 19-50 with less than 16 oz milk per day
- less than 10 hours of sun per week
- no Vitamin D supplements
- no anticonvulsants
- no barbiturates
- no steroids
- no meds that increase photosensitivity
- no granulomatous disease
- no liver or kidney disease
- no history of skin cancer
- BMI less than 30
- skin types I \& II
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Creighton Universitylead
- The UV Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Creighton University
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura A Armas, MD
Creighton University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2009
First Posted
January 7, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
February 1, 2009
Last Updated
December 1, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-11