Full Disclosure Observational Cardiac Rhythm Documentation Follow-up After Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Therapy
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
24 hour Holter monitoring (24HM) is commonly used to assess cardiac rhythm after surgical therapy of atrial fibrillation. This "snapshot" rhythm documentation leaves a large diagnostic window of non recorded atrial arrhythmias and as such a large amount of uncertainty in follow-up result assessment. To improve accuracy of rhythm surveillance thus gaining a more "real-life" scenario of post surgical ablation therapy cardiac rhythm a new insertable cardiac rhythm monitor device (Reveal® XT 9525, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) with full observational continuous heart rhythm documentation is implanted. In order to verify different follow-up strategies after surgical atrial fibrillation therapy, a comparison of different follow-up scenarios (symptoms, different cardiac documentation devices i.e. ECG and 24 hour Holter monitor, at different follow-up time points) is performed intraindividually. Thus the reliability of these devices and follow-up strategies to define success after ablation therapy is evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2007
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedJuly 2, 2010
December 1, 2008
1.4 years
December 10, 2008
July 1, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Atrial fibrillation burden development after surgical ablation therapy
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of different cardiac rhythm documentation strategies to define success after ablation therapy
3 years
Study Arms (1)
Cardiac surgery patients
Patients in atrial fibrillation being scheduled for cardiac surgery and concomitant ablation procedure
Interventions
post surgical procedure implantation of insertable event recorder for long time heart rhythm surveillance afte ablation therapy
During cardiac surgery after stand alone or concomitant ablation procedure, an insertable loop recorder will be implanted subcutaneously in left pectoral region. After surgery, patients will be monitored regularly in a quarterly basis by performing telemetry of the device in the outpatient clinic. Furthermore, home telemetry will be performed once a month for optimal heart rhythm observation.
Eligibility Criteria
patients who are scheduled for cardiac surgery and who also present with any kind of atrial fibrillation.
You may qualify if:
- patients in atrial fibrillation (AF duration \>4 months)being scheduled for cardiac surgery
- patients with lone atrial fibrillation being scheduled for surgical AF treatment
You may not qualify if:
- failure to provide informed consent
- current participation in another clinical trial
- organic cause of atrial fibrillation (hyperthyroidism etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinic for Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Lübeck, Germany
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23538, Germany
Related Publications (4)
Hanke T, Charitos EI, Stierle U, Karluss A, Kraatz E, Graf B, Hagemann A, Misfeld M, Sievers HH. Twenty-four-hour holter monitor follow-up does not provide accurate heart rhythm status after surgical atrial fibrillation ablation therapy: up to 12 months experience with a novel permanently implantable heart rhythm monitor device. Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11 Suppl):S177-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.838474.
PMID: 19752365RESULTCharitos EI, Ziegler PD, Stierle U, Robinson DR, Graf B, Sievers HH, Hanke T. Atrial fibrillation burden estimates derived from intermittent rhythm monitoring are unreliable estimates of the true atrial fibrillation burden. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Sep;37(9):1210-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12389. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
PMID: 24665972DERIVEDCharitos EI, Ziegler PD, Stierle U, Robinson DR, Graf B, Sievers HH, Hanke T. How often should we monitor for reliable detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence? Efficiency considerations and implications for study design. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 12;9(2):e89022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089022. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24563690DERIVEDCharitos EI, Stierle U, Ziegler PD, Baldewig M, Robinson DR, Sievers HH, Hanke T. A comprehensive evaluation of rhythm monitoring strategies for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence: insights from 647 continuously monitored patients and implications for monitoring after therapeutic interventions. Circulation. 2012 Aug 14;126(7):806-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098079. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
PMID: 22824434DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hans-H. Sievers, M.D.
Clinic for Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Luebeck, germany
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thorsten Hanke, M.D.
Clinic for Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Luebeck, germany
- STUDY CHAIR
Ulrich Stierle, M.D.
Clinic for Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Luebeck, Germany
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2008
First Posted
December 11, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 2, 2010
Record last verified: 2008-12