Impact of SPN on Infection Rate, Duration of Mechanical Ventilation & Rehabilitation in ICU Patients
Impact of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition (SPN) on Infection Rate, Duration of Mechanical Ventilation and Rehabilitation in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Quality Control Program for the Implementing of New Nutrition Guidelines
1 other identifier
interventional
305
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Rationale: Enteral nutrition (EN) in the intensive care (ICU) patients is recommended as a standard of care. However, EN alone is often associated with insufficient energy intakes and increased complication rates. Recently the investigators proposed to decrease this deficit by combining EN and supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) whenever EN is insufficient (\< 60% of their predicted energy needs) at day 3 after admission in the ICU. Objective: This study aims at: a/ investigating if the delivery of optimal nutrition support (100 % of predicted energy targets) in ICU patients by the combined administration of SPN and EN optimizes their clinical outcome; b/ implementing the new ICU nutrition guidelines. Study design: Prospective, controlled, randomized clinical study. Study site: Service of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospital. Patient population: 220 ICU patients to be included: expected length of stay \> 5 days, expected survival \> 7 days, no contraindication to EN, obtained informed consent from themselves or their next of keen. Exclusion criteria: refusal of consent, age \< 18 years, short bowel syndrome, significant persistent gastrointestinal dysfunction with ileus, high output proximal fistula (\> 1,5 liter/d), patients receiving PN. Nutrition: At day 3 after admission, if energy input is \< 60%; patients are randomized into either the "Control group" (EN alone) or the "SPN group" (EN + PN) to reach 100% of their predicted energy needs. Tight glycaemic control (target 6.0 to 8.3 mmol/l) to be achieved according to our local practice by insulin administration. Study endpoints:
- Primary: nosocomial infections (CDC criteria)
- Secondary: Mechanical ventilation duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, antibiotic free days, ICU complications (extra-renal epuration, neurological, cardiac and respiratory complications), energy and protein balance, 28 days clinical outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2008
Typical duration for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 19, 2013
CompletedApril 19, 2013
April 1, 2013
3.2 years
December 3, 2008
January 7, 2013
April 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Documented Infection Rate
Infection, defined according to CDC criteria during the ICU and hospital stay, occurrence between day 9 and day 28
20 days
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Hours on Mechanical Ventilation in All Patients
28 days
Antibiotic Free Days
20 days
Total Energy Intake During the Intervention Period , Between Day 4 and Day 8.
5 days
General Mortality
28 days
Days in ICU
28 days
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
SPN group
EXPERIMENTALexperimental arm: Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition (SPN) is added to enteral nutrition (EN) to reach 100% of their predicted energy needs from ICU day 4. In the treated group, SPN is started if at day 4 energy input by EN is \< 60% of energy target in order to reach 100% of energy target by peripheral or central line. Nutritional products as currently used in our institution. SPN is composed of EN and PN, both techniques being currently used in our institution.
Control gr
NO INTERVENTIONEN : start EN at 20-30 ml/h per day up to maximal 150 ml/h per day; or day1: 500 ml, day2: 1000 ml, day3: 1500 ml of EN dependant on gastrointestinal tolerance (gastric residue volume more than 500ml). Nutritional products as currently used in our institution.
Interventions
SPN : in the treated group, SPN is started if at day 4 energy input by EN is \< 60% of energy target in order to reach 100% of energy target by peripheral or central line.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Expected ICU stay \> 5 days
- Expected survival \> 7 days
- No contraindication to EN
- Obtained informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of consent
- Age \< 18 years
- Short bowel syndrome
- Significant persistent gastrointestinal dysfunction with ileus
- High output proximal fistula (\> 1.5 liter/d)
- Patients receiving PN
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Genevalead
- University of Lausanne Hospitalscollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Service of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospital,
Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Service de Médecine Intensive Adulte et Centre des Brûlés
Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
Related Publications (2)
Heidegger CP, Romand JA, Treggiari MM, Pichard C. Is it now time to promote mixed enteral and parenteral nutrition for the critically ill patient? Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jun;33(6):963-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0654-7. Epub 2007 Apr 28.
PMID: 17468845BACKGROUNDHeidegger CP, Berger MM, Graf S, Zingg W, Darmon P, Costanza MC, Thibault R, Pichard C. Optimisation of energy provision with supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2013 Feb 2;381(9864):385-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61351-8. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
PMID: 23218813DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The trial was limited by the fact that it was not double blinded by design. However, the risk of bias was reduced because the investigators worked independently from the physicians in charge of the patients.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr CP Heidegger
- Organization
- Geneva University Hospitals, Division of Intensive Care,Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, CH-1211 Geneva 14/Switzerland
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claudia P HEIDEGGER, MD
Division of Intensive Care, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy head physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2008
First Posted
December 5, 2008
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 19, 2013
Results First Posted
April 19, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04