NCT00802022

Brief Summary

Rationale: Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications of Diabetes Mellitis (DM). Pain is a common symptom of diabetic neuropathy, affecting 11-34% of patients suffering form DM. The current available medication often provides insufficient pain relief and/or has unacceptable side effects. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for over 30 years to treat neuropathic pain. Various small clinical studies have shown a beneficial effect of SCS on pain in PDP. Objective: This study is a preparation to a RCT to investigate whether SCS is a good indication in patients which suffer from pain with moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs. The main objective of this study is whether SCS leads to sufficient pain relief and to obtain insight into the working mechanism of SCS. The hypothesis is that the effect SCS is most effective in patients without major sensory deficits. Furthermore, practical feasibility of the test procedures described in the study protocol will be examined, including the questionnaires to be filled out by the patient. Also, technical feasibility of SCS will be investigated. Besides the feasibility, the possibility of predicting successful pain relief by SCS by classifying patients according to the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score will be assessed. Furthermore, possible other predictors for successful pain relief by SCS will be defined. Study design: the study is a pilot study in preparation to a RCT to investigate the effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain in moderate-to-severe PDP patients. Study population: patients suffering from moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs as diagnosed by clinical symptoms and supported by the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score. Intervention: patients will receive 2 weeks of trial stimulation and best (drug) treatment as usual. Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study parameter is the pain score as measured by a numeric rating scale (NRS) according to Jensen and a Patient Global Impression of Change for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: SCS related risks include: lead migration (14%), lead breakage (7%), implanted pulse generator migration (1%), loss of therapeutic effect, lost or unpleasant paresthesias (12%), infection or wound breakdown (10%), Pain at IPG incision site (12%), IPG pocket fluid collection (5%).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2008

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 4, 2008

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2009

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

July 8, 2010

Status Verified

July 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

December 3, 2008

Last Update Submit

July 7, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

diabetic neuropathieselectric stimulation therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain intensity measured on a weighted NRS according to Jensen and a PGIC for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale.

    Baseline, 2 weeks after trial stimulation, 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The practical- and technical feasibility of the procedures, predicting successful pain relief by SCS by classifying patients according to the MDNS. Define possible other predictors for successful pain relief.

    Baseline, 2 weeks after trial stimulation, 3, 6 and 12 months

Interventions

The intervention is spinal cord stimulation and will be used for 2 weeks trial stimulation. After clinical successful pain relief (50% of more pain reduction)a definite spinal cord system will be implanted.

Also known as: Medtronic leads and neurostimulator (CE mark 0123)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs
  • The pain intended to treat has been present for more than 12 months
  • Previous treatment has been unsuccessful (insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects) with drugs from the following drug categories:
  • Amitriptyline or an other tricyclic antidepressant and/or
  • Pregabalin (Lyrica), Gabapentin (Neurontin) or Carbamazepine and/or
  • Duloxetine (Cymbalta) and/or
  • Tramadol or strong opioids Patients were treated with 3 drugs from the above mentioned drug categories and followed the treatment algorithm for painful diabetic polyneuropathy according to Jensen. Each drug is tried for 3 weeks and dose is raised once. By insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects, the drug treatment was stopped. Patients reached a steady state in medication use and it is not allowed to change the use of medication during the study.
  • Mean pain intensity should be 5 or higher measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS), which will be scored 3 times per day during 4 days according to Jensen.
  • Patients age is between 18 and 75 years.

You may not qualify if:

  • The patient has had neuromodulation therapy during the month before the intake
  • The patient has ever had neuromodulation
  • Neuropathic pain prevalent in the upper limbs (NRS above 3)
  • Neuropathy or chronic pain of other origin than diabetes mellitus (NRS above 3)
  • Addiction: drugs, alcohol (5E/day) and/or medication
  • Drugs: cocaine, heroine, marihuana,
  • Alcohol: wine, beer, liquor.
  • Medication: benzodiazepines, morphine receptor agonists.
  • Insufficient cooperation from the patient (little motivation, understanding or communication)
  • Blood clotting disorder
  • Immune deficiency (HIV-positive, corticosteroids with a dose equivalent to prednisolone 10 mg, immunosuppressive, etc.)
  • Active foot ulceration
  • Life expectancy shorter than 1 year
  • Pacemaker
  • Local infection or other skin disorders at site of incision
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Maastricht University Hospital

Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Tesfaye S, Watt J, Benbow SJ, Pang KA, Miles J, MacFarlane IA. Electrical spinal-cord stimulation for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Lancet. 1996 Dec 21-28;348(9043):1698-701. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02467-1.

    PMID: 8973433BACKGROUND
  • de Vos CC, Rajan V, Steenbergen W, van der Aa HE, Buschman HP. Effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain caused by diabetic neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.08.002. Epub 2008 Apr 16.

    PMID: 18413161BACKGROUND
  • van Beek M, Geurts JW, Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, van Dongen RT, van Kuijk SMJ, van Kleef M. Severity of Neuropathy Is Associated With Long-term Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcome in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Two-Center Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):32-38. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0983. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Neuropathies

Interventions

Spinal Cord Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Maarten van Kleef, prof. dr.

    Maastricht University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2008

First Posted

December 4, 2008

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion

July 1, 2010

Study Completion

July 1, 2010

Last Updated

July 8, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-07

Locations