Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy
SCS
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications of Diabetes Mellitis (DM). Pain is a common symptom of diabetic neuropathy, affecting 11-34% of patients suffering form DM. The current available medication often provides insufficient pain relief and/or has unacceptable side effects. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for over 30 years to treat neuropathic pain. Various small clinical studies have shown a beneficial effect of SCS on pain in PDP. Objective: This study is a preparation to a RCT to investigate whether SCS is a good indication in patients which suffer from pain with moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs. The main objective of this study is whether SCS leads to sufficient pain relief and to obtain insight into the working mechanism of SCS. The hypothesis is that the effect SCS is most effective in patients without major sensory deficits. Furthermore, practical feasibility of the test procedures described in the study protocol will be examined, including the questionnaires to be filled out by the patient. Also, technical feasibility of SCS will be investigated. Besides the feasibility, the possibility of predicting successful pain relief by SCS by classifying patients according to the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score will be assessed. Furthermore, possible other predictors for successful pain relief by SCS will be defined. Study design: the study is a pilot study in preparation to a RCT to investigate the effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain in moderate-to-severe PDP patients. Study population: patients suffering from moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs as diagnosed by clinical symptoms and supported by the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score. Intervention: patients will receive 2 weeks of trial stimulation and best (drug) treatment as usual. Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study parameter is the pain score as measured by a numeric rating scale (NRS) according to Jensen and a Patient Global Impression of Change for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: SCS related risks include: lead migration (14%), lead breakage (7%), implanted pulse generator migration (1%), loss of therapeutic effect, lost or unpleasant paresthesias (12%), infection or wound breakdown (10%), Pain at IPG incision site (12%), IPG pocket fluid collection (5%).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2010
CompletedJuly 8, 2010
July 1, 2010
1.5 years
December 3, 2008
July 7, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity measured on a weighted NRS according to Jensen and a PGIC for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale.
Baseline, 2 weeks after trial stimulation, 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The practical- and technical feasibility of the procedures, predicting successful pain relief by SCS by classifying patients according to the MDNS. Define possible other predictors for successful pain relief.
Baseline, 2 weeks after trial stimulation, 3, 6 and 12 months
Interventions
The intervention is spinal cord stimulation and will be used for 2 weeks trial stimulation. After clinical successful pain relief (50% of more pain reduction)a definite spinal cord system will be implanted.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs
- The pain intended to treat has been present for more than 12 months
- Previous treatment has been unsuccessful (insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects) with drugs from the following drug categories:
- Amitriptyline or an other tricyclic antidepressant and/or
- Pregabalin (Lyrica), Gabapentin (Neurontin) or Carbamazepine and/or
- Duloxetine (Cymbalta) and/or
- Tramadol or strong opioids Patients were treated with 3 drugs from the above mentioned drug categories and followed the treatment algorithm for painful diabetic polyneuropathy according to Jensen. Each drug is tried for 3 weeks and dose is raised once. By insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects, the drug treatment was stopped. Patients reached a steady state in medication use and it is not allowed to change the use of medication during the study.
- Mean pain intensity should be 5 or higher measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS), which will be scored 3 times per day during 4 days according to Jensen.
- Patients age is between 18 and 75 years.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient has had neuromodulation therapy during the month before the intake
- The patient has ever had neuromodulation
- Neuropathic pain prevalent in the upper limbs (NRS above 3)
- Neuropathy or chronic pain of other origin than diabetes mellitus (NRS above 3)
- Addiction: drugs, alcohol (5E/day) and/or medication
- Drugs: cocaine, heroine, marihuana,
- Alcohol: wine, beer, liquor.
- Medication: benzodiazepines, morphine receptor agonists.
- Insufficient cooperation from the patient (little motivation, understanding or communication)
- Blood clotting disorder
- Immune deficiency (HIV-positive, corticosteroids with a dose equivalent to prednisolone 10 mg, immunosuppressive, etc.)
- Active foot ulceration
- Life expectancy shorter than 1 year
- Pacemaker
- Local infection or other skin disorders at site of incision
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maastricht University Hospital
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Tesfaye S, Watt J, Benbow SJ, Pang KA, Miles J, MacFarlane IA. Electrical spinal-cord stimulation for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Lancet. 1996 Dec 21-28;348(9043):1698-701. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02467-1.
PMID: 8973433BACKGROUNDde Vos CC, Rajan V, Steenbergen W, van der Aa HE, Buschman HP. Effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain caused by diabetic neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.08.002. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
PMID: 18413161BACKGROUNDvan Beek M, Geurts JW, Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, van Dongen RT, van Kuijk SMJ, van Kleef M. Severity of Neuropathy Is Associated With Long-term Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcome in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Two-Center Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):32-38. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0983. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
PMID: 29109298DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maarten van Kleef, prof. dr.
Maastricht University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2008
First Posted
December 4, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 1, 2010
Last Updated
July 8, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-07