NCT04008745

Brief Summary

The main objective of this trial is to investigate the effect of an educational booklet foot-related exercise in diabetic neuropathy status, functional outcomes and gait biomechanics in people with diabetic neuropathy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 5, 2019

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2021

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 26, 2021

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 2, 2019

Results QC Date

November 9, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

exercise therapydiabetic footpreventive carefoot-related exerciseself-managementmusculoskeletal functionBookletPrimary Health Care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change From Baseline Diabetic Neuropathy Symptoms at 8-weeks

    Score of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI). This questionnaire comprises 15 questions about symptoms and events related to leg and foot sensitivity and is administered by the participant himself. The answers are summed to get a total score. The sum of all items results in a score ranging from 0 to 13 (13 represents the worst rating of the neuropathy).

    8-weeks

  • Change From Baseline of the Fuzzy Classification of the Diabetic Neuropathy Severity at 8-weeks

    The fuzzy classification of the diabetic neuropathy severity will be given by the Fuzzy software score developed by the Laboratory of Biomechanics of Movement and Human Posture (LaBIMPH) available free of charge at: http://www.usp.br/labimph/fuzzy/. It is a decision support system for classification of the diabetic neuropathy. This decision is based on three domains: signs and symptoms extracted from the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument; tactile sensitivity through the number of non-sensible areas using a 10-g monofilament; and vibration sensitivity by vibrating a tuning fork (128Hz) characterized as absent, present or diminished. The software produces a score from 0 to 10 and the higher the score, the more severe the diabetic neuropathy.

    8-weeks

  • Change From Baseline Diabetic Neuropathy Symptoms at 16-weeks (Follow-up)

    Score of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI). This questionnaire comprises 15 questions about symptoms and events related to leg and foot sensitivity and is administered by the participant himself. The answers are summed to get a total score. The sum of all items results in a score ranging from 0 to 13 (13 represents the worst rating of the neuropathy).

    16-weeks (Follow-up)

  • Change From Baseline of the Fuzzy Classification of the Diabetic Neuropathy Severity at 16-weeks (Follow-up)

    The fuzzy classification of the diabetic neuropathy severity will be given by the Fuzzy software score developed by the Laboratory of Biomechanics of Movement and Human Posture (LaBIMPH) available free of charge at: http://www.usp.br/labimph/fuzzy/. It is a decision support system for classification of the diabetic neuropathy. This decision is based on three domains: signs and symptoms extracted from the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument; tactile sensitivity through the number of non-sensible areas using a 10-g monofilament; and vibration sensitivity by vibrating a tuning fork (128Hz) characterized as absent, present or diminished. The software produces a score from 0 to 10 and the higher the score, the more severe the diabetic neuropathy.

    16-weeks (Follow-up)

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Change From Baseline of the Foot and Ankle Kinematics During Gait at 8-weeks

    8-weeks

  • Change From Baseline of the Foot and Ankle Kinetics During Gait at 8-weeks

    8-weeks

  • Change From Baseline Dynamic Plantar Pressure Distribution During Gait at 8-weeks

    8-weeks

  • Change From Baseline Tactile Sensitivity at 8-weeks

    8-weeks

  • Change From Baseline Vibration Sensitivity at 8-weeks

    8-weeks

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in the intervention group will perform foot-related exercises described in an educational booklet three times/week at home. In the follow-up period, patients will follow the same schedule set by the project till the end of the study (16-weeks).

Other: Educational and home-based physical therapy by foot-related exercises

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in the control group will not receive any specific intervention in addition to the treatment recommended by the health professionals team (doctors, nurses, podiatrists), which includes pharmacological treatment, and self-care recommendations and foot care by international consensus.

Interventions

The booklet is divided in 2: educational and exercise protocol. The aim of the first part is to guide the individual for a change in his/her health behavior, and comprises info about diabetic neuropathy, foot care, shoes, and benefits of exercising. The second part is the foot protocol, composed by 6 exercises. The maximum duration of a session is 20min and should be performed 3 times/week. The subject should warm-up the foot-ankle and then start exercising in the order suggested by the booklet, filling a table with the effort perceived (effort likert scale). The foot exercises progresses from one set with 30 repetitions in a sitting position, to exercising standing, then performing the exercise on one foot only. Other progression criterion is to increase the number of sets performed. The effort scale regulates the individual effort for his/her progression, which is also registered by the participant in the monthly table at the booklet.

Intervention Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2;
  • Moderate or severe neuropathy confirmed with the fuzzy software;
  • Ability to walk independently in the laboratory

You may not qualify if:

  • Hallux amputation or total amputation of the foot;
  • History of surgical procedure in the knee, ankle or hip;
  • History of arthroplasty and / or lower limb orthosis or indication of lower limb arthroplasty throughout the intervention period;
  • Neurological and / or rheumatologic diseases diagnosed;
  • Inability to provide consistent information;
  • Perform physiotherapy intervention throughout the intervention period;
  • Receiving any physiotherapy intervention or offloading devices;
  • Major vascular complications;
  • Severe retinopathy;
  • Ulceration not healed for at least 6 months and / or active ulcer;
  • Score between 12-21 (Probable Depression) from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Érica Queiroz da Silva

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05360160, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Silva EQ, Santos DP, Beteli RI, Monteiro RL, Ferreira JSSP, Cruvinel-Junior RH, Donini A, Verissimo JL, Suda EY, Sacco ICN. Feasibility of a home-based foot-ankle exercise programme for musculoskeletal dysfunctions in people with diabetes: randomised controlled FOotCAre (FOCA) Trial II. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 11;11(1):12404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91901-0.

  • Silva EQ, Suda EY, Santos DP, Verissimo JL, Ferreira JSSP, Cruvinel Junior RH, Monteiro RL, Sartor CD, Sacco ICN. Effect of an educational booklet for prevention and treatment of foot musculoskeletal dysfunctions in people with diabetic neuropathy: the FOotCAre (FOCA) trial II, a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Feb 13;21(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4115-8.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic NeuropathiesDiabetic Foot

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System DiseasesDiabetic AngiopathiesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesFoot UlcerLeg UlcerSkin UlcerSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

It was a relatively short intervention period for major musculoskeletal and biomechanical changes, there was limited control over the exercise intensity, and only six exercises were included in the booklet. The participants were not blinded to the treatment. Control of glycated hemoglobin and glycemia. The education level of the participant.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Isabel de Camargo Neves Sacco
Organization
University of Sao Paulo

Study Officials

  • Isabel CN Sacco, PhD

    Associate Professor at São Paulo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Investigator (allocation, statistics, data processing) and assessor will be blid to the subjects allocation. To evaluate whether or not there was a failure in blinding of the outcome assessor, investigators and other assessors, they will be asked to guess which group the patients belonged to at the end of 8-weeks of treatment. Then the assessors will classify the certainty of their opinions according to a scale (1 = not sure, 5 = completely sure). To ensure that the assessor is not induced to correctly guess the participants' allocation, the patient will be instructed to not disclose any behavior details during the previous 8-weeks.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Assignment
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2019

First Posted

July 5, 2019

Study Start

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion

May 1, 2021

Study Completion

November 26, 2021

Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Results First Posted

September 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations