Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin in Children With Neurogenic Bladder
A Phase IIb/III, Multi-centre, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Dose Ranging Study of Tamsulosin Hydrochloride (Low, Medium and High Dose) as Treatment in Children With Neuropathic Bladder for Three Months
1 other identifier
interventional
231
13 countries
52
Brief Summary
Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a range of doses of tamsulosin hydrochloride as treatment in children with an elevated detrusor leak point pressure associated with a known neurological deficit
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
52 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 24, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 12, 2012
CompletedOctober 29, 2015
September 1, 2015
1.1 years
November 20, 2008
August 6, 2012
September 29, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Response to Treatment Defined as Patients Who Decrease Their Detrusor Leak Point Pressure (LPP) to <40 cm H2O Based Upon Two Evaluations on the Same Day.
The primary endpoint was response to treatment defined as patients who decreased their detrusor leak point pressure (LPP) based upon two evaluations on the same day to less than 40 cm H2O at Week 14 (end of treatment). Detrusor leak point pressure (LPP) recorded in cm H2O was obtained using a standard urodynamic technique, a cystometrogram. On treatment (OT): Consist of all on treatment data. Observations measured ≤3 days of stopping treatment was considered as on treatment. Missing data in these analyses was not replaced or imputed.
Week 14
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change From Baseline in LPP at Week 14 (End of Treatment)
Baseline and Week 14
Percentage Change From Baseline in LPP at Week 14 (End of Treatment)
Baseline and Week 14.
Response With Regard to Hydronephrosis Was Defined as Improvement or Stabilisation Based Upon the Renal Ultrasound Grading at Week 14 (End of Treatment) Compared to Baseline
Baseline and Week 14
Response With Regard to Hydroureter Was Defined as Improvement or Stabilisation Based Upon the Renal Ultrasound at Week 14 (End of Treatment) Compared to Baseline
Baseline and Week 14
Change From Baseline in Urine Volume at Week 14
Baseline and Week 14
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received matching placebo to tamsulosin hydrochloride via opened capsules every day for 14 weeks
Low dose
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received 0.001 - 0.002 mg/kg tamsulosin hydrochloride via opened capsules every day for 14 weeks
Medium dose
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received 0.002 - 0.004 mg/kg tamsulosin hydrochloride via opened capsules every day for 14 weeks
High dose
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received 0.004 - 0.008 mg/kg tamsulosin hydrochloride via opened capsules every day for 14 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Neuropathic bladder secondary to a known neurologic deficit (e.g. spina bifida)
- Elevated detrusor leak point pressures (LPP) ≥40 cm H2O confirmed by two measurements
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant abnormalities as determined by the investigator
- A history of relevant orthostatic hypotension, fainting spells or blackouts
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (52)
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, 33614, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Unknown Facility
Buffalo, New York, 14222, United States
Unknown Facility
Tarrytown, New York, 10591, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Unknown Facility
Akron, Ohio, 44308, United States
Unknown Facility
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Santo André, 09060-650, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Berlin, 10115, Germany
Unknown Facility
Deggendorf, 94469, Germany
Unknown Facility
Essen, 45122, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, 22763, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mainz, 55101, Germany
Unknown Facility
Ahmedabad, 380-006, India
Unknown Facility
Belagavi, 590-010, India
Unknown Facility
Bengaluru, 560-010, India
Unknown Facility
Hyderabaad, 500-029, India
Unknown Facility
Kochi, 682-026, India
Unknown Facility
Lucknow, 226-014, India
Unknown Facility
Ludhiana, India
Unknown Facility
Manipal, 576-104, India
Unknown Facility
Mumbai, 400-008, India
Unknown Facility
Nadiād, 387-001, India
Unknown Facility
Nagpur, India
Unknown Facility
New Delhi, 110-029, India
Unknown Facility
Pune, 411-001, India
Unknown Facility
Pune, 411-053, India
Unknown Facility
Cagliari, 09134, Italy
Unknown Facility
Florence, 50139, Italy
Unknown Facility
Roma, 00165, Italy
Unknown Facility
León, 37660, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Puebla City, 72190, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Manila, 1000, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Pasig, 1604, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Quezon City, 1104, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Moscow, 119991, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, 194100, Russia
Unknown Facility
Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Cape Town, 7700, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Johannesburg, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, 0028, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Roodepoort, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Gwangju, 501-757, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Incheon, 400-711, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Pusan, 602-739, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, 08025, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, 28046, Spain
Unknown Facility
Málaga, 29011, Spain
Unknown Facility
Chernivtsy, 58002, Ukraine
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Company makes no warranties or representations of any kind as to the posting, expressed or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not be liable for any damages.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center
- Organization
- Boehringer Ingelheim
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2008
First Posted
November 24, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
February 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 29, 2015
Results First Posted
September 12, 2012
Record last verified: 2015-09