CATHETER ANALGESIA TRIAL Phenazopyrdine vs. Placebo: a Randomized Controlled Trial
CATH
THE CAT(H) STUDY CATHETER ANALGESIA TRIAL Phenazopyrdine vs. Placebo: a Randomized Controlled Trial A CREST 2010 Project
1 other identifier
interventional
258
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the utility of phenazopyridine HCl vs. placebo in reducing catheter-associated discomfort during the post-operative period in the gynecologic patient using mean VAS measurments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Aug 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 13, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 11, 2015
CompletedSeptember 29, 2016
August 1, 2016
1.4 years
October 9, 2008
April 20, 2015
August 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction of Catheter-associated Discomfort During the Post-operative Period in the Gynecologic Patient Using Mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Measurments
The VAS measures bladder pain on a straight line from 0 to 10 in centimeters, where a mark of zero indicates no pain and a mark of 10 indicates worst possible pain. Mean VAS score was recorded for participants in the active treatment and placebo cohorts.
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Study Medication Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants that are randomized to the phenazopyridine HCl group will receive the study medication (200 mg of phenzopyridine HCl orally) after leaving the operating room. We anticipate the first dose to be given after the patient has left the recovery area. We will continue use of study medication until it has been given up to 24 hours after the first VAS collection or catheter removal, whichever occurs first
Placebo tablet Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORFor participants randomized to the placebo group will follow the same dosing schedule for the study medication, although they will receive an inert placebo tablet.
Interventions
Phenazopyrdine HCl 200 mg q8h x 24
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Adult women undergoing gynecologic surgery who are expected to tolerate oral medication within 12 post-operative hours and require an indwelling catheter for a minimum of 12 post operative hours after start of oral medication.
You may not qualify if:
- Hypersensitivity to phenazopyridine products (Defined as a having a previous anaphylaxis reaction to phenazopyridine products).
- Known contraindications to phenazopyridine HCl:
- Renal failure or insufficiency (Defined as having abnormal renal function on previous laboratory testing (BUN/Cr) or as having a known renal disease).
- History of hepatic disease or failure (Defined as having known liver disease or having elevated LFTs on previous laboratory testing. Patients who would not otherwise have such testing are not required to undergo special study labs).
- Known glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.
- Simultaneous suprapubic catheterization.
- Inability to take oral medication within 12 hours after surgery.
- Pregnant women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Loyola Univeristy Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
Related Publications (1)
Anderson C, Chimhanda M, Sloan J, Galloway S, Sinacore J, Brubaker L. Phenazopyridine does not improve catheter discomfort following gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;204(3):267.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.045.
PMID: 21376167RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
One limitation of our study was inconsistent collection of our primary outcome data. Nursing staff and house staff failed to collect VAS scores consistently.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Linda Brubaker
- Organization
- Loyola University Chicago
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Linda Brubaker, MD
Loyola University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Medicine and Dean and Chief Diversity Officer, Stritch School of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2008
First Posted
October 13, 2008
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
September 29, 2016
Results First Posted
June 11, 2015
Record last verified: 2016-08