Dynamic Hyperinflation and Tiotropium
Simplified Detection of Dynamic Hyperinflation Using Metronome Paced Hyperventilation and the Effect of Tiotropium in Patients With COPD
3 other identifiers
interventional
30
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
We will detect dynamic hyperinflation (DH) in 40 COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) patients with moderately severe disease using metronome paced hyperventilation (MPH) with inspiratory capacity as the primary end point. Hypothesis: Is tiotropium capable of lung volume protecting inspiratory capacity from MPH induced DH vs placebo in a randomized crossover double blinded study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Oct 2006
Typical duration for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 5, 2012
CompletedAugust 20, 2019
July 1, 2017
2.3 years
December 6, 2007
August 20, 2011
August 10, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Bronchodilator Response:Peak FEV1(L)(Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second)-
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD): peak FEV1 (+2h) after 30 days of placebo or tiotropium in 29 moderate COPD patients. FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in one second
30 days
Bronchodilator Response:Peak FRC (L) (Functional Residual Capacity)
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD): peak FRC after 30 days (+2h) of placebo or tiotropium in 29 moderate COPD patients.
30 days
Bronchodilator Response: Peak FVC (L) (Forced Vital Capacity)- Tiotropium and Placebo
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) of peak forced vital capaciy (L) after 30 days (+2h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Forced vital capacity - liters
30 days
Bronchodilator Response: Peak IC (L) - (Inspiratory Capacity) - Tiotropium Versus Placebo
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) - Peak inspiratory capacity after 30 days (+2h)of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Inspiratory capacity- liters
30 days
Bronchodilator Response: Peak FRC/TLC Percentage (Functional Residual Capacity(L)/Total Lung Capacity(L) - Tiotropium or Placebo
Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) peak Peak FRC/TLC after 30 days (+2h)of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Functional residual capacity/total lung capacity - percentage
30 days
Bronchodilator Response: Peak TLC (L) (Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium or Placebo
Net change in lung function studies (mean +/- SE) from baseline to trough (-1h) and peak (+2h) after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Total lung capacity - liters
30 days
Bronchodilator Response: Trough FEV1 (L)- (Forced Expiratory Volume) Tiotropium Versus Placebo
Lung function studies Trough FEV1(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Forced expiratory volume in 1s (liters)
30 days
Bronchodilator Response: Trough FRC (L)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo
Lung function studies Trough FRC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Functional residual capacity(liters)
30 days
Bronchodilator Response: Trough FVC (L)- (Forced Vital Capacity) Tiotropium Versus Placebo
Lung function studies Trough FVC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients
30 days
Bronchodilator Response: Trough IC (L) Inspiratory Capacity - Tiotropium Versus Placebo
Lung function studies (Trough IC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients Trough inspiratory capacity- liters
30 days
Bronchodilator Response: Trough FRC/TLC (Functional Residual Capacity/Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo
Lung function studies Trough FRC/TLC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients Trough Functional residual capacity/total lung capacity - percentage
30 days
Bronchodilator Response: Trough TLC (L) (Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo
Lung function studies Trough TLC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients
30 days
IC (Inspiratory Capacity L)and Metronome Paced Hyperventilation-induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo and Baseline
IC measurement before and after metronome paced hyperventilation-induced dynamic hyperinflation at baseline and in tiotropium and placebo groups. Measure ratio of functional residual capacity divided by total lung capacity at baseline and after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo
baseline and 30 days (+2h) post dose
TLC (L) Before and After Metronome Paced Hyperventilation Induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo
Total lung capacity before and after metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation in tiotropium cohort versus placebo. Difference between TLC measured at one hour before intervention \& 2 hrs. after after 30 days of treatment with either placebo or tiotropium
one hour before intervention & 2 hrs. after after 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema and and Lung Function of FEV1(l) After Tiotropium
baseline to 30 days
IC (Inspiratory Capacity, L) Post Mph (Metronome Paced Hyperventilation) Induced dh (Dynamic Hyperinflation) After Tiotropium and Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema
baseline to 30 days
Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema and and Lung Function of FRC/TLC (Functional Residual Capacity(L)/Total Lung Capacity (L) After Tiotropium
baseline to trough tiotropium
Study Arms (2)
Tiotropium 18 µg capsule, bronchodilator
ACTIVE COMPARATORtiotropium 18 µg capsule for 1 month versus placebo. To study bronchodilation and effect following metronome paced hyperventilation and induced dynamic hyperinflation of active tiotropium versus placebo
2
PLACEBO COMPARATORplacebo 18ug tiotropium for 1 month
Interventions
Procedure/Surgery - tiotropium 18ug capsule daily for 1 month vs placebo to study the effect of trough and peak effect on bronchodilation and effect of metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Moderately severe COPD patients age 40-85 yr with post 180ug albuterol FEV 1 between 60 and 79% predicted and FEV 1/FVC \< 70%.
- Smoking history \> 10 pack yr.
- Clinically stable X 6 weeks.
- No oxygen usage.
You may not qualify if:
- History of asthma
- Clinically unstable
- Any other significant medical problem precluding full cooperation for study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gelb, Arthur F., M.D.lead
- Boehringer Ingelheimcollaborator
- Pfizercollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Arthur F Gelb MD
Lakewood, California, 90712, United States
Noe Zamel MD
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Related Publications (3)
Gelb AF, Gutierrez CA, Weisman IM, Newsom R, Taylor CF, Zamel N. Simplified detection of dynamic hyperinflation. Chest. 2004 Dec;126(6):1855-60. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.6.1855.
PMID: 15596684BACKGROUNDGelb AF, Taylor CF, McClean PA, Shinar CM, Rodrigues MT, Gutierrez CA, Chapman KR, Zamel N. Tiotropium and simplified detection of dynamic hyperinflation. Chest. 2007 Mar;131(3):690-695. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1662.
PMID: 17356081BACKGROUNDGelb AF, Fraser C, Zamel N. Lack of protective effect of tiotropium vs induced dynamic hyperinflation in moderate COPD. Respir Med. 2011 May;105(5):755-60. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.11.020. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
PMID: 21159499DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Arthur F Gelb MD Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Arthur F Gelb MD
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arthur F Gelb, MD
Arthur F Gelb Medical Corporation
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Noe Zamel, MD
Mt. Sinai Hosp. Toronto, Univ Toronto Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDIV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2007
First Posted
December 7, 2007
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
March 1, 2009
Last Updated
August 20, 2019
Results First Posted
October 5, 2012
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Please see published data