NCT00769548

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Hormone therapy combined with radiation therapy may be a more effective treatment for prostate cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of four different combinations of radiation and hormone therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,322

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 1995

Longer than P75 for phase_3 prostate-cancer

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 1995

Completed
6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2001

Completed
7.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 8, 2008

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 9, 2008

Completed
8.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

January 4, 2017

Status Verified

December 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

6 years

First QC Date

October 8, 2008

Last Update Submit

December 30, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

adenocarcinoma of the prostatestage I prostate cancerstage IIB prostate cancerstage IIA prostate cancerstage III prostate cancerstage IV prostate cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Progression-free survival (Arms 1, 3 vs. Arms 2, 4)

    From randomization to the first occurrence of biochemical failure, clinical failure (local or distant), death from any cause, or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Progression-free survival (Arms 1, 2 vs. Arms 3, 4)

    From randomization to the first occurrence of biochemical failure, clinical failure (local or distant), death from any cause, or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.

  • Local progression

    From randomization to the date of local progression or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.

  • Distant metastasis

    From randomization to the date of metastatic disease or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.

  • Overall survival

    From the date of randomization to the date of death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.

Study Arms (4)

Arm 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Neoadjuvant total androgen suppression (TAS) given 2 months before and during radiation therapy (RT) to the whole pelvis followed by a prostate boost.

Drug: flutamideDrug: goserelin acetateRadiation: low-LET photon therapy

Arm 2

EXPERIMENTAL

Neoadjuvant TAS given 2 months before and during RT to the prostate only.

Drug: flutamideDrug: goserelin acetateRadiation: low-LET photon therapy

Arm 3

EXPERIMENTAL

RT to the whole pelvis followed by a boost to the prostate followed by 4 months of TAS.

Drug: flutamideDrug: goserelin acetateRadiation: low-LET photon therapy

Arm 4

EXPERIMENTAL

RT to the prostate only followed by 4 months of TAS.

Drug: flutamideDrug: goserelin acetateRadiation: low-LET photon therapy

Interventions

Drug used for TAS.

Arm 1Arm 2Arm 3Arm 4

Drug used for TAS.

Arm 1Arm 2Arm 3Arm 4

radiation therapy

Also known as: radiation therapy
Arm 1Arm 2Arm 3Arm 4

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 120 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate Any stage with an estimated risk of node involvement at least 15% (and therefore at significant risk for local and/or systemic failure) based on pretreatment PSA and Gleason score (GS), e.g.: GS of 7 and PSA greater than 7.5 ng/mL GS of 6 and PSA greater than 22.5 ng/mL GS of 5 and PSA greater than 37.5 ng/mL PSA greater than 4 and less than 100 ng/mL Highest pretreatment value determined by a monoclonal assay that has a normal range of 0-4 ng/mL PSA measured by polyclonal assay (e.g., Yang) that has a normal range of 0-2.5 ng/mL may need to be divided by a conversion factor of approximately 1.5 GS determination required prior to entry No distant metastases No biopsy proven lymph node involvement Ineligible for protocol RTOG-9408 (clinical stages T2c-T4 with GS of 6 or higher are eligible for this study) PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Any age Performance status: Karnofsky 70-100% Hematopoietic: Not specified Hepatic: Liver function tests no greater than 1.2 times normal Renal: Not specified Other: No major medical or psychiatric illness that would prevent completion of treatment or interfere with follow-up No second malignancy within 5 years except superficial nonmelanomatous skin cancer PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: At least 90 days since testosterone At least 60 days since finasteride Radiotherapy: No prior radiotherapy Surgery: No more than 60 days since surgical staging No radical surgery or cryosurgery

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (24)

  • Du KL, Bae K, Movsas B, Yan Y, Bryan C, Bruner DW. Impact of marital status and race on outcomes of patients enrolled in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group prostate cancer trials. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jun;20(6):1317-25. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1219-4. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

    PMID: 21720747BACKGROUND
  • Hamstra DA, Bae K, Pilepich MV, Hanks GE, Grignon DJ, McGowan DG, Roach M, Lawton C, Lee RJ, Sandler H. Older age predicts decreased metastasis and prostate cancer-specific death for men treated with radiation therapy: meta-analysis of radiation therapy oncology group trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):1293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.2004. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

    PMID: 21458924BACKGROUND
  • Rodrigues G, Bae K, Roach M, Lawton C, Donnelly B, Grignon D, Hanks G, Porter A, Lepor H, Sandler H. Impact of ultrahigh baseline PSA levels on biochemical and clinical outcomes in two Radiation Therapy Oncology Group prostate clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jun 1;80(2):445-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.034. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

    PMID: 20615632BACKGROUND
  • Roach M 3rd, Bae K, Lawton C, Donnelly BJ, Grignon D, Hanks GE, Porter A, Lepor H, Venketesan V, Sandler H. Baseline serum testosterone in men treated with androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Dec 1;78(5):1314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.073. Epub 2010 Apr 8.

    PMID: 20378270BACKGROUND
  • Millar J, Boyd R, Sutherland J. An update of the phase III trial comparing whole pelvic to prostate only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant to adjuvant total androgen suppression: updated analysis of RTOG 94-13, with emphasis on unexpected hormone/radiation interactions: in regard to Lawton et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:646-655.). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 May 1;71(1):316; author reply 316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.009. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18406900BACKGROUND
  • Williams S, Wiltshire K. Updated analysis of RTOG 94-13: in regard to Lawton et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:646-655). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 May 1;71(1):315; author reply 315-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.021. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18406897BACKGROUND
  • Paner GP, Bae K, Grignon DJ, et al.: Trends in Gleason grading of prostate cancer (PCa): analysis of reporting by institutional and central review pathologists in four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocols spanning 17 years and 2094 needle biopsies (bxs). [Abstract] United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology 96th Annual Meeting, March 24-30, 2007, San Diego, CA. A-766, 2007.

    BACKGROUND
  • Pan CC, Bae K, Hanks GE, et al.: Comparison of two types of biochemical failures within the ASTRO and Phoenix Consensus definitions in patients treated on RTOG 92-02 and 94-13. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (3 Suppl 1): A-2196, S318, 2006.

    BACKGROUND
  • Roach M, Moughan J, Movsas B, et al.: Socio-demographic predictors of biochemical failure and survival among high risk patients treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) prostate cancer trials: a meta-analysis. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (3 Suppl 1): A-1127, S204, 2006.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ganswindt U, Paulsen F, Corvin S, Eichhorn K, Glocker S, Hundt I, Birkner M, Alber M, Anastasiadis A, Stenzl A, Bares R, Budach W, Bamberg M, Belka C. Intensity modulated radiotherapy for high risk prostate cancer based on sentinel node SPECT imaging for target volume definition. BMC Cancer. 2005 Jul 28;5:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-5-91.

    PMID: 16048656BACKGROUND
  • Johnke RM, Edwards JM, Evans MJ, Nangami GN, Bakken NT, Kilburn JM, Lee TK, Allison RR, Karlsson UL, Arastu HH. Circulating cytokine levels in prostate cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy: influence of neoadjuvant total androgen suppression. In Vivo. 2009 Sep-Oct;23(5):827-33.

    PMID: 19779119BACKGROUND
  • Roach M 3rd. The role of PSA in the radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 1996 Aug;10(8):1143-53; discussion 1154-61.

    PMID: 8869957BACKGROUND
  • Lawton CA, DeSilvio M, Roach M 3rd, Uhl V, Kirsch R, Seider M, Rotman M, Jones C, Asbell S, Valicenti R, Hahn S, Thomas CR Jr. An update of the phase III trial comparing whole pelvic to prostate only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant to adjuvant total androgen suppression: updated analysis of RTOG 94-13, with emphasis on unexpected hormone/radiation interactions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 1;69(3):646-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 May 24.

  • Taussky D, Bae K, Bahary JP, Roach M 3rd, Lawton CA, Shipley WU, Sandler HM. Does timing of androgen deprivation influence radiation-induced toxicity? A secondary analysis of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 9413. Urology. 2008 Nov;72(5):1125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.067. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

  • Roach M 3rd, DeSilvio M, Valicenti R, Grignon D, Asbell SO, Lawton C, Thomas CR Jr, Shipley WU. Whole-pelvis, "mini-pelvis," or prostate-only external beam radiotherapy after neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy in patients treated in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413 trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Nov 1;66(3):647-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.074.

  • Taussky D, Bae K, Bahary J, et al.: Does testosterone influence radiation-induced toxicity In radiotherapy of the prostate? A secondary analysis of RTOG protocol 9413. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (3 Suppl 1): A-2215, S329-30.

    RESULT
  • Roach M, DeSilvio M, Thomas C Jr, et al.: Field size and progression free survival (PFS) after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) and radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer: secondary analysis of RTOG 9413. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2005 Prostate Cancer Symposium, 17-19 February 2005, Orlando, Florida. A-87, 2005.

    RESULT
  • Roach M, DeSilvio M, Thomas CR, et al.: Progression free survival (PFS) after whole-pelvic (WP) vs. mini-pelvic (MP) or prostate only (PO) radiotherapy (RT): a subset analysis of RTOG 9413, a phase III prospective randomized using neoadjuvant and concurrent (N&CHT). [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 (Suppl 1): A-1014, S264, 2004.

    RESULT
  • Roach M 3rd, DeSilvio M, Lawton C, Uhl V, Machtay M, Seider MJ, Rotman M, Jones C, Asbell SO, Valicenti RK, Han S, Thomas CR Jr, Shipley WS; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 15;21(10):1904-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.004.

  • Roach M III, DeSilvio M, Lawton C, et al.: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) with whole-pelvic (WP) radiotherapy (RT) improves progression-free survival (PFS): RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) 9413, a phase III randomized trial. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-711, 2002.

    RESULT
  • Spratt DE, Tang S, Sun Y, Huang HC, Chen E, Mohamad O, Armstrong AJ, Tward JD, Nguyen PL, Lang JM, Zhang J, Mitani A, Simko JP, DeVries S, van der Wal D, Pinckaers H, Monson JM, Campbell HA, Wallace J, Ferguson MJ, Bahary JP, Schaeffer EM, Sandler HM, Tran PT, Rodgers JP, Esteva A, Yamashita R, Feng FY. Artificial Intelligence Predictive Model for Hormone Therapy Use in Prostate Cancer. NEJM Evid. 2023 Aug;2(8):EVIDoa2300023. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300023. Epub 2023 Jun 29.

  • Nguyen PL, Huang HR, Spratt DE, Davicioni E, Sandler HM, Shipley WU, Efstathiou JA, Simko JP, Pollack A, Dicker AP, Roach M, Rosenthal SA, Zeitzer KL, Mendez LC, Hartford AC, Hall WA, Desai AB, Rabinovitch RA, Peters CA, Rodgers JP, Tran P, Feng FY. Analysis of a Biopsy-Based Genomic Classifier in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Meta-Analysis of the NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9202, 9413, and 9902 Phase 3 Randomized Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Jul 1;116(3):521-529. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.035. Epub 2022 Dec 31.

  • Spratt DE, Malone S, Roy S, Grimes S, Eapen L, Morgan SC, Malone J, Craig J, Dess RT, Jackson WC, Hartman HE, Kishan AU, Mehra R, Kaffenberger S, Morgan TM, Reichert ZR, Alumkal JJ, Michalski J, Lee WR, Pisansky TM, Feng FY, Shipley W, Sandler HM, Schipper MJ, Roach M 3rd, Sun Y, Lawton CAF. Prostate Radiotherapy With Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Improves Metastasis-Free Survival Compared to Neoadjuvant ADT: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 10;39(2):136-144. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02438. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

  • Roach M, Moughan J, Lawton CAF, Dicker AP, Zeitzer KL, Gore EM, Kwok Y, Seider MJ, Hsu IC, Hartford AC, Horwitz EM, Yamoah K, Jones CU, Michalski JM, Lee WR, Pisansky TM, Rabinovitch R, Rotman M, Pryzant RM, Kim HE, Thomas CR Jr, Shipley WU, Sandler HM. Sequence of hormonal therapy and radiotherapy field size in unfavourable, localised prostate cancer (NRG/RTOG 9413): long-term results of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1504-1515. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30528-X. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

FlutamideGoserelinRadiotherapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesGonadotropin-Releasing HormonePituitary Hormone-Releasing HormonesHypothalamic HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsNeuropeptidesPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsOligopeptidesNerve Tissue ProteinsProteinsTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Mack Roach, MD

    University of California, San Francisco

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2008

First Posted

October 9, 2008

Study Start

April 1, 1995

Primary Completion

April 1, 2001

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

January 4, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-12