NCT00002703

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of conventional radiation therapy with high-dose radiation therapy in treating men with stage I or stage II prostate cancer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
390

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 1996

Typical duration for phase_3 prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 1996

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 1, 1999

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 1, 2004

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2005

Completed
Last Updated

November 6, 2013

Status Verified

April 1, 2012

First QC Date

November 1, 1999

Last Update Submit

November 5, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

adenocarcinoma of the prostatestage I prostate cancerstage IIB prostate cancerstage IIA prostate cancer

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate Primary tumor confined to prostate TNM clinical Stages T1b-c or T2a-b No T1a No T1b-c tumor with Gleason grade 1-2/5 No Gleason grade 1-2/5 and PSA less than 4 ng/mL Nodes negative on imaging (Nx) or by surgical sampling (N0) PSA no greater than 15 ng/mL Treatment must begin within 28 days after randomization PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Any age Performance status: Karnofsky 70%-100% Life expectancy: Greater than 10 years Other: No major medical or psychiatric illness that precludes protocol entry No prior or concurrent second malignancy within 5 years except basal cell skin cancer PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior treatment for prostate cancer

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Loma Linda University Medical Center

Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States

Location

Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Coen JJ, Zietman AL, Rossi CJ, Grocela JA, Efstathiou JA, Yan Y, Shipley WU. Comparison of high-dose proton radiotherapy and brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer: a case-matched analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):e25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.039. Epub 2011 Apr 4.

  • Nguyen PL, Chen RC, Hoffman KE, Trofimov A, Efstathiou JA, Coen JJ, Shipley WU, Zietman AL, Talcott JA. Rectal dose-volume histogram parameters are associated with long-term patient-reported gastrointestinal quality of life after conventional and high-dose radiation for prostate cancer: a subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Nov 15;78(4):1081-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.015. Epub 2010 Mar 6.

  • Zietman AL, Bae K, Slater JD, Shipley WU, Efstathiou JA, Coen JJ, Bush DA, Lunt M, Spiegel DY, Skowronski R, Jabola BR, Rossi CJ. Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95-09. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1106-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8475. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

  • Rossi CJ, Zietman AL, DeSilvio M, et al.: A randomized trial comparing conventional dose (70.2GyE) and high-dose (79.2GyE) conformal radiation in early stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: results of an interim analysis of PROG 95-09. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2005 Prostate Cancer Symposium, 17-19 February 2005, Orlando, Florida. A-58, 2005.

    RESULT
  • Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, Rossi CJ Jr, Miller DW, Adams JA, Shipley WU. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1233-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1233.

  • Zietman AL, DeSilvio M, Slater JD, et al.: A randomized trial comparing conventional dose (70.2GyE) and high-dose (79. 2GyE) conformal radiation in early stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: results of an interim analysis of PROG 95-09. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 (Suppl 1): A-4, S131, 2004.

    RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Anthony L. Zietman, MD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 1999

First Posted

September 1, 2004

Study Start

January 1, 1996

Study Completion

September 1, 2005

Last Updated

November 6, 2013

Record last verified: 2012-04

Locations