Study Stopped
Potential participants with COPD/asthma unwilling to participate.
Comparison of Dobutamine and Regadenoson Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (MR)
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this research is to determine the utility of Regadenoson (Lexiscan)for use as an imaging agent with cardiac MR. If found useful, it will help us establish a protocol for regadenoson stress MR perfusion (Regadenoson stress test with cardiac MR).The investigators will compare regadenoson with dobutamine so each participant will undergo two studies. A cardiac MR stress test with regadenoson and with dobutamine. The investigators participants will include patients with history of COPD and Asthma, so it will also help us determine feasibility of Regadenoson in these patient's subgroups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for early_phase_1 coronary-artery-disease
Started Jan 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 26, 2018
CompletedSeptember 26, 2018
September 1, 2018
1.9 years
September 26, 2008
October 27, 2017
September 25, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of Procedures
To compare the time involved during pharmacologic stress testing using regadenoson versus intravenous dobutamine in individuals with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)or asthma.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Ease of Administration of Regadenoson Versus Intravenous Dobutamine Using Compare MD Questionnaire
1 day
Ease of Administration of Regadenoson Versus Intravenous Dobutamine Using Compare MD Questionnaire (Episodes of Arrhythmias, Bradycardia, and Wheezing)
1 day
Ease of Administration of Regadenoson Versus Intravenous Dobutamine Using Compare Tech Questionnaire
1 day
Ease of Administration of Regadenoson Versus Intravenous Dobutamine Using Compare Tech Questionnaire (Episodes of Wheezing)
1 day
Ease of Administration of Regadenoson Versus Intravenous Dobutamine Using Compare Nurse Questionnaire
1 day
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
A
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm A will get Dobutamine Stress test with cardiac MR (CMR). Both arms will then cross over to the other arm to get the second test. So each participant will undergo two types of testing.
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm B will get Regadenoson stress test with CMR. Both arms will then cross over to the other arm to get the second test. So each participant will undergo two types of testing.
Interventions
Each participant will receive regadenoson 0.4mg (5ml) one time bolus dose at one visit.
Each participant will receive dobutamine infusion (as per protocol to achieve a target heart rate of 85% of predicted for age) at another visit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women aged 40 to 85 years with OBSTRUCTIVE AIRWAY DISEASES (ASTHMA AND COPD) and a forced expiratory volume (FEV1) \> 0.5.
- Patients should have a clinical indication to undergo cardiac stress test with dobutamine.
You may not qualify if:
- Those with pacemakers, defibrillators, functioning neural stimulator devices or other implanted electronic devices.
- Ferromagnetic cerebral aneurism clips or other intraorbital and intracranial metal.
- An allergy to Gadolinium or other severe drug allergies.
- Acute myocardial infarction within 3 months.
- Moderate or severe aortic stenosis or other significant valvular disease;
- Claustrophobia.
- High grade (2o or 3o) AV Block.
- Closed angle glaucoma.
- Participants unable to provide informed consent.
- Renal dialysis (subjects with moderate-to-severe renal impairment defined as eGFR \< 60 mL/min.
- A contraindication to receipt of dobutamine.
- Participants with known coronary artery disease will be included with the exception that patients with left main or narrowings \>50% in the distributions of the left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary artery will be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wake Forest University Health Scienceslead
- Astellas Pharma US, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Related Publications (5)
Leaker BR, O'Connor B, Hansel TT, Barnes PJ, Meng L, Mathur VS, Lieu HD. Safety of regadenoson, an adenosine A2A receptor agonist for myocardial perfusion imaging, in mild asthma and moderate asthma patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):329-36. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
PMID: 18513639BACKGROUNDThomas GS, Tammelin BR, Schiffman GL, Marquez R, Rice DL, Milikien D, Mathur V. Safety of regadenoson, a selective adenosine A2A agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RegCOPD trial). J Nucl Cardiol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):319-28. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.02.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
PMID: 18513638BACKGROUNDIskandrian AE, Bateman TM, Belardinelli L, Blackburn B, Cerqueira MD, Hendel RC, Lieu H, Mahmarian JJ, Olmsted A, Underwood SR, Vitola J, Wang W; ADVANCE MPI Investigators. Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):645-58. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.114.
PMID: 17826318BACKGROUNDGordi T, Frohna P, Sun HL, Wolff A, Belardinelli L, Lieu H. A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of regadenoson, an adenosine A2A-receptor agonist, in healthy male volunteers. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(12):1201-12. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200645120-00005.
PMID: 17112296BACKGROUNDHendel RC, Bateman TM, Cerqueira MD, Iskandrian AE, Leppo JA, Blackburn B, Mahmarian JJ. Initial clinical experience with regadenoson, a novel selective A2A agonist for pharmacologic stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 6;46(11):2069-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.097. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
PMID: 16325044BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gregory Hundley
- Organization
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William G Hundley, M.D., F.A.C.C., F.A.H.A
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2008
First Posted
September 30, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
September 26, 2018
Results First Posted
September 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09