Diagnostic Study of Rapid Regadenoson Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) to Detect Coronary Artery Disease
Diagnostic Value of a Rapid Protocol Regadenoson Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Scan for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of a novel rapid regadenoson stress CMR protocol for detecting of obstructive coronary artery disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
Started Aug 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 3, 2017
September 1, 2017
6.8 years
September 21, 2011
September 29, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Profile of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of rapid regadenoson stress CMR.
Evaluate the profile of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of a rapid regadenoson stress CMR protocol for the detection of \>= 70% stenosis of a major epicardial coronary artery on invasive coronary angiography.
Up to 7 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate time for performance of rapid regadenoson stress CMR protocol.
Up to 7 days
Study Arms (1)
single-arm
OTHERAdditional images collected during routine cardiac MRI (CMR) with diagnostic imaging agent, regadenoson.
Interventions
Intravenous administration of 0.4 mg dose of Regadenoson using per routine CMR, as indicated in the package insert.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 years or older
- Scheduled for invasive coronary angiography
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to give informed consent
- Possible pregnancy (confirmed by urine test)
- Women who are breastfeeding
- Severe claustrophobia
- Inability to lie flat for 20-30 minutes (the anticipated amount of time to complete the MRI procedure)
- Individuals with cochlear implants
- Individuals with non-MRI compatible aneurysm clips
- Potential contraindications to regadenoson use due to:
- Severe lung disease (active wheezing) Severe bradycardia (heart rate \< 40 beats/min) Second- or third-degree atrioventricular heart block Sick sinus syndrome History of Long QT syndrome Severe hypotension (systolic BP \< 80 mm Hg) Decompensated heart failure
- Contraindication to administration of Gadolinium (Gd) based contrast agents (GBCA):
- Stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (eGFR \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) Known allergy to GBCA
- Special Considerations:
- \- Although individuals who have an occupational history of welding, grinding, or other metal work will not be excluded from the study, they must undergo an orbital x-ray, to exclude any occult metal fragments, before they can participate in this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dipan Shahlead
- Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (13)
Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, Elliott MD, Regenfus M, Parker M, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Kim RJ, Judd RM. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet. 2003 Feb 1;361(9355):374-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12389-6.
PMID: 12573373BACKGROUNDKim HW, Klem I, Shah DJ, Wu E, Meyers SN, Parker MA, Crowley AL, Bonow RO, Judd RM, Kim RJ. Unrecognized non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: prevalence and prognostic significance in patients with suspected coronary disease. PLoS Med. 2009 Apr 21;6(4):e1000057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000057. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
PMID: 19381280BACKGROUNDWilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, Huang Y, Christensen BV, Stillman AE, Ugurbil K, McDonald K, Wilson RF. Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. Radiology. 1997 Aug;204(2):373-84. doi: 10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240523.
PMID: 9240523BACKGROUNDAl-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, Bornstedt A, Schnackenburg B, Klein C, Klimek W, Oswald H, Fleck E. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2000 Mar 28;101(12):1379-83. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1379.
PMID: 10736280BACKGROUNDSchwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, Bertschinger K, Buchi M, Knusel PR, Marincek B, Luscher TF, von Schulthess GK. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation. 2001 May 8;103(18):2230-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.18.2230.
PMID: 11342469BACKGROUNDNagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, Hettwer S, Schnackenburg B, Wegscheider K, Fleck E. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2003 Jul 29;108(4):432-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080915.35024.A9. Epub 2003 Jul 14.
PMID: 12860910BACKGROUNDKlem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ, Sketch MH Jr, Behar V, Weinsaft J, Cawley P, Parker M, Elliott M, Judd RM, Kim RJ. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 18;47(8):1630-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.074. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
PMID: 16631001BACKGROUNDKim RJ, Shah DJ, Judd RM. How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003 Jul;5(3):505-14. doi: 10.1081/jcmr-120022267.
PMID: 12882082BACKGROUNDWu E, Judd RM, Vargas JD, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Kim RJ. Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2001 Jan 6;357(9249):21-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03567-4.
PMID: 11197356BACKGROUNDChoudhury L, Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Choi KM, Elliott MD, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Judd RM, Kim RJ. Myocardial scarring in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Dec 18;40(12):2156-64. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02602-5.
PMID: 12505229BACKGROUNDMcCrohon JA, Moon JC, Prasad SK, McKenna WJ, Lorenz CH, Coats AJ, Pennell DJ. Differentiation of heart failure related to dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease using gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2003 Jul 8;108(1):54-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078641.19365.4C. Epub 2003 Jun 23.
PMID: 12821550BACKGROUNDGibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS, Ferguson TB Jr, Fihn SD, Fraker TD Jr, Gardin JM, O'Rourke RA, Pasternak RC, Williams SV; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jan 1;41(1):159-68. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02848-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 12570960BACKGROUNDMetz CE, Herman BA, Roe CA. Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making. 1998 Jan-Mar;18(1):110-21. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9801800118.
PMID: 9456215BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dipan Shah, M.D.
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2011
First Posted
October 4, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09