Study Stopped
Closed due to slow patient accrual.
A Phase III Study of En Bloc Versus Non-En Bloc Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
4
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test 2 different methods of surgery to remove cancer in the esophagus. This research is being done to see whether removing more tissue and lymph nodes surrounding the tumor in the esophagus (known as transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy) offers better control of the cancer than removing less tissue and lymph nodes (known as non-en bloc esophagectomy).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2008
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2012
CompletedAugust 13, 2012
August 1, 2012
3.6 years
September 25, 2008
August 10, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Disease free survival defined as the time from surgical resection to the time of recurrent disease, death from esophageal cancer, or death from any cause.
CT scans will be performed every 6 months for 5 years.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
To determine 5-year overall and disease-specific survival in arm A and arm B
CT scans every 6 months for 5 years
To determine the rates of local and systemic recurrence in arm A vs. arm B
CT scans performed every 6 months for 5 years
To determine time to progression in arm A vs. arm B
CT scans every 6 months for 5 years
To determine mortality and morbidity in arm A vs. arm B
5 years from the date of surgical resection
Study Arms (2)
A
ACTIVE COMPARATOREn bloc esophagectomy is performed through a transthoracic approach by removing the tumor-bearing esophagus, the pericardium anteriorly, both pleural surfaces laterally, as well as the thoracic duct and all other lymphoareolar tissue wedged posteriorly between the esophagus and the spine, and en-bloc resection of all nodal groups in the middle and lower mediastinum as well as the upper abdomen.
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORTranshiatal esophagectomy is performed through an abdominal incision and a neck incision. The stomach is mobilized, and the left gastric vessels are transected at its origin. Celiac lymph nodes are dissected, and the intrathoracic esophagus is dissected bluntly through the hiatus and through the neck. The cervical esophagus is divided at the level of the neck. After the esophagogastrectomy is performed, a gastric tube is created. An esophagogastrostomy is then performed in the neck. If a transthoracic approach is used, dissection will be as described for the transhiatal approach.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with cT2-T3/N0-N1-M1a-M1b(lymph node metastasis only) esophageal squamous cell and adenocarcinoma who have potentially resectable disease.
- Karnofsky performance status greater than or equal to 80%.
- Pulmonary and cardiac function must be acceptable for surgery according to institutional standards.
- Acceptable hepatic, renal and bone marrow function.
- Age 18 or older.
- Patients may receive preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy as part of their clinical care.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with clearly unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer or clinical stage I esophageal cancer.
- Significant psychiatric illness that would interfere with patient compliance.
- Patients with any other serious underlying medical condition that would impair the ability of the patient to receive or comply with protocol treatment.
- Patients with a significant history of unstable cardiovascular disease (e.g., inadequately controlled hypertension, or angina; myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months; ventricular cardiac arrhythmias requiring medication; congestive heart failure that in the opinion of the treating physician should preclude the patient from protocol treatment.
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or uncontrolled infection, including HIV or interstitial pneumonia or interstitial fibrosis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Weill Medical College of Cornell Unversity
New York, New York, 10065, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul C Lee, M.D.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2008
First Posted
September 26, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 13, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-08