NCT00756496

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare image processing software to support a new image processing software application for a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
442

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2006

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2006

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 18, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2008

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2009

Completed
11.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 7, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 7, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

September 18, 2008

Results QC Date

August 17, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 11, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve to Compare Diagnostic Accuracy of 2 Algorithms in Breast Cancer Diagnosis

    The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate non-inferiority of the Siemens' processing algorithm to Lorad's processing algorithm with regards to readers' diagnostic accuracy in detecting and characterizing breast lesions. The non-inferiority analyses were performed by comparing the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the two algorithms \& to compare false positive marks per subject. The ROC curve incorporates both sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate) providing a single assessment incorporating both measures. It shows in a graphical way the trade-off between clinical sensitivity and specificity for every possible cut-off for a test, and gives an idea about the benefit of using the test in question. The higher the total area under the curve, the greater the predictive power of the reader assessments. A breast-based analysis was used for the primary AUC comparison in order to obtain additional power by having more normal/benign breasts.

    ~1 year. Women with negative or biopsy benign findings at baseline (study entry) were followed for 1 year to confirm the negative status at 1-year follow-up mammography exam. Women diagnosed with cancer were not followed up.

Study Arms (1)

1

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Mammography screening and diagnosis

Interventions

Mammography screening and diagnosis

1

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female
  • \> 40 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women, or women who may become pregnant
  • Mammographic evidence of breast surgery, prior radiation to the breast, needle projection or pre-biopsy markings are evident in the mammogram (but may include breast implants)
  • Palpable lesion or one that is visible by another modality
  • Inmates

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

Diagnosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Milind Dhamankar
Organization
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Raymond C Duhamel, Ph.D.

    Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2008

First Posted

September 22, 2008

Study Start

November 1, 2006

Primary Completion

December 1, 2008

Study Completion

January 1, 2009

Last Updated

December 7, 2020

Results First Posted

December 7, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11