Herniectomy Versus Herniectomy With a Spinal Stabilization System for the Treatment of Complex Disc Disease
Herniectomy vs. Herniectomy With a Spinal Stabilization System for the Treatment of Complex Disc Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
165
8 countries
19
Brief Summary
The study aims at assessing the short and long-term effectiveness and patient perception of benefit with the use of a DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System in the treatment of complex disc disease at a single level from L2 to L5.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_4
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 23, 2014
CompletedJanuary 28, 2016
January 1, 2016
6.4 years
September 9, 2008
April 24, 2014
January 26, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To Demonstrate a Statistically Significant Difference in the Relief of Back Pain Between Both Treatment Groups. The Endpoint Will be the Difference Between Baseline and 6-month of the Patient's Back-pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The endpoint will be the difference between baseline and 6 months of the patient's back-pain score on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A standardized visual analogue scale (0cm-10cm; with 0cm meaning 'no pain' and 10cm meaning 'worst possible pain') will be used. Large values of the VAS score represent large degree of pain. Large (negative) change in VAS score (6 months - baseline) represents large relief of pain. For treated subjects, all analyses except the safety analyses, Intent-To-Treat population will serve as the primary analysis dataset.
6 Months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To Demonstrate a Statistically Significant Difference in the Reduction of Disability Between Both Treatment Groups. The Endpoint Will be the Difference Between Baseline and 12 Months of the Patient's Score on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
12 Months
Study Arms (2)
Investigational group
EXPERIMENTALSingle level herniectomy followed by placement of the DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle level herniectomy
Interventions
The DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System is a spacer that is inserted between adjoining spinous processes after doing a standard herniectomy procedure using a posterior surgical approach.
Herniectomy is defined as the "removal of the extruded/protruded/sequestrated disc material". This is done by probing the annulus and disc space and removing all mobile disc fragments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has a history of sciatica (radicular pain) for at least 6 weeks, but not more than 1 year secondary to one symptomatic lumbar disc herniation at the levels L2-L5 as confirmed by patient history and clinical evaluation, and without major neurological impairment (i.e. not less than M 3/5; Medical Research Council Classification);
- Has a history of continuous low back pain for no more than 1 year secondary to lumbar degenerative disc disease (intermittent back pain may occur for more than a year);
- Has pre-treatment back pain score greater than or equal to 3, concomitant with leg pain score greater than or equal to 6. Leg pain score must be greater than back pain score (pain intensity score measured on a 10 cm VAS scale);
- Has one symptomatic disc herniation: protrusion, extrusion or sequestration (Milette \& Fardon, 2001) as confirmed by MRI at the target level;
- Evidence of disc degeneration ≤ Grade IV at the target and adjacent levels as confirmed by MRI (Pfirrmann, 2001);
- Has an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score ≥ 34%;
- Has been treated non-operatively (e.g. bed rest, physical therapy, medications, TENS, manipulation, hydrotherapy, acupressure/acupuncture, massage, bracing and/or spinal injections) for at least 6 continuous weeks unless strong clinical grounds for expediting surgery;
- Patient male or female, age 20-60 years inclusive and is skeletally mature;
- Is willing and able to comply with the study plan and able to provide an informed consent;
You may not qualify if:
- Has a primary diagnosis of spinal disorder other than degenerative disc at the involved level;
- Has a symptomatic disc herniation at more than one lumbar level;
- Requires a herniectomy at more than one lumbar level;
- Has a disc degeneration at the treated and adjacent levels \> Grade IV (Pfirrmann, 2001);
- Has a decrease of disc height ≥ 30% as measured by the center of the disc space, and compared to the disc space at the next superior spinal level;
- Has Modic changes on MRI greater than Grade I at the target level;
- Has Modic changes on MRI at the adjacent levels;
- Has an advanced degree of retrolisthesis as shown by lateral X-rays (\> 25%, i.e. grade I as per Meyerding);
- Has a clinical evidence of lysis, antero listhesis or scoliosis (Cobb angle more than 10°);
- Has signs of segmental instability: more than 4 mm of translation or more than 10° angular motion between adjacent end plates (comparing flexion and extension views);
- Has congenital or iatrogenic posterior element insufficiency (e.g. facet resection, spondylolysis, pars fracture, or Spinal Bifida Occulta);
- Has had any previous lumbar spine surgery;
- Has a Waddell signs of inorganic behaviour score greater than or equal to 3;
- Has evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder, cognitive impairment or other known condition, significant enough to impact the perception of pain, precludes surgical procedure, clinical evaluation and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by investigator;
- Has a known allergy to silicone, polyethylene, or titanium;
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
Cliniques Universitaires Bruxelles Hôpital Erasme
Brussels, Belgium
AZ Sint-Lucas
Ghent, Belgium
Hôpital de la Citadelle
Liège, Belgium
AZ Sint-Elisabeth Hospital
Zottegem, Belgium
University Hospital Olomouc, dept of Neurosurgery
Olomouc, Czechia
Otto-Von-Guericke Universität
Magdeburg, Germany
CA NCH Klinikum rechts der Isar/München
München, Germany
Medizinisches Zentrum Kreis Aachen
Würselen, Germany
Anthea Casa di Cura
Bari, Italy
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi
Milan, Italy
St. Luke Hospital, University of Rzeszow, dept of Neurosurgery
Tarnów, Poland
Hospital Universitari Bellvitge
Barcelona, Spain
Hospital de León
León, Spain
Hôpital Fribourgeois
Fribourg, Switzerland
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
Geneva, Switzerland
Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna
Lucerne, Switzerland
Chase Farm Hospital
Enfield, United Kingdom
St. Georges Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Greater Manchester Neuroscience Center
Salford, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The current study was limited by not reaching the target enrollment. Because of the low patient recruitment rate, despite major efforts by the investigators and sponsor, enrollment was stopped prematurely.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Irène Ayer, Clinical research specialist
- Organization
- Medtronic Spinal & Biologics
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ferdiand Krappel, Dr.
Spitalzentrum Oberwallis, Brig
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2008
First Posted
September 10, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
April 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 28, 2016
Results First Posted
May 23, 2014
Record last verified: 2016-01