A Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy Study of ACE-011 in Patients With Osteolytic Lesions of Multiple Myeloma
A Phase 2a, Multi-Center, Randomized, Multiple-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of ACE-011 (hActRIIA-IgG1) in Patients With Osteolytic Lesions of Multiple Myeloma
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Multi-center, randomized, multiple-dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ACE-011 in patients with osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 multiple-myeloma
Started Sep 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 multiple-myeloma
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 3, 2024
CompletedOctober 3, 2024
June 1, 2024
11 months
September 3, 2008
January 4, 2024
June 17, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causality assessment. A TEAE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinical significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition, which was temporally associated with the use of the sponsor's medicinal (investigational) product, was also a TEAE. The number of participants with at least one TEAE are reported.
From first dose to termination visit on Day 169
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Related to Study Drug
A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) related to study drug was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, that was determined to be related to the study drug. A TEAE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinical significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition, which was temporally associated with the use of the sponsor's medicinal (investigational) product, was also a TEAE. The number of participants with at least one TEAE are reported. Treatment emergent adverse events were assessed by the investigator as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug.
From first dose to termination visit on Day 169
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose (including overdose) that was fatal, was life threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in permanent or significant disability/incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. The number of participants with at least one serious adverse event are reported.
From first dose up to termination visit on Day 169
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Summary of the change from baseline in hemoglobin (g/dL) by the pre-specified timepoints. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to dosing. Data were summarized for all treated participants who had at least 1 postdosing measurement.
Day 1 (baseline), Day 8, Day 29, Day 36, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 169
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities
The number of participants with at least one clinically significant postbaseline electrocardiogram abnormality. The abnormalities included left ventricular hypertrophy, atrial fibrillation, sinus bradycardia, sinus tachycardia, and myocardial ischemia. Data is reported as the cumulative number of participants with abnormalities over the scheduled collection timepoints.
Pre-dose, Day 1, Day 92, and Day 169
Number of Participants With Hypertension or Increased Blood Pressure
The number of participants who experienced hypertension or an increase in blood pressure from baseline up to Day 92. Abnormal blood pressure was defined as: * Systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 or ≥ 180 mmHg * Systolic blood pressure change (increase or decrease) ≥ 20 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure ≤ 60 or ≥ 100 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure change (increase or decrease) ≥ 15 mmHg
From baseline up to Day 92
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Skeletal-related Events (SRE)
From first dose up to 2 weeks post first dose
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
From baseline (Day 1) to Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169
Study Arms (4)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubcutaneous injection on days 1, 29, 57 and 85.
ACE-011 0.1 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALSubcutaneous injection of ACE-011 0.1 mg/kg every 28 days totaling four doses (days 1, 29, 57 and 85).
ACE-011 0.3 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALSubcutaneous injection of ACE-011 0.3 mg/kg every 28 days totaling four doses (days 1, 29, 57 and 85).
ACE-011 0.5 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALSubcutaneous injection of ACE-011 0.5 mg/kg every 28 days totaling four doses (days 1, 29, 57 and 85).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient at least 18 years of age with stage II or III multiple myeloma
- One or more lytic bone lesions
- If currently receiving bisphosphonate therapy, have been on a stable dose for ≥ 2 months before dosing day 1 or must not have received bisphosphonates within 2 months of dosing day 1
- If patient has undergone previous autologous or allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), they must be stable (in the opinion of the investigator) and be a minimum of 6 months since HSCT
- Has planned HSCT for the duration of the study
- Has moles or lesions that are currently undiagnosed, but are suspect for malignancy
- Has an underlying condition that may result in abnormal bone metabolism other than cancer related bone lesions, such as a history of hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, hypocalcemia, rheumatoid arthritis, myeloproliferative disorder, gout, Paget's disease of the bone, or osteomalacia; patients with a diagnosis of osteoporosis prior to multiple myeloma diagnosis are eligible to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- Known underlying condition that may result in abnormal bone metabolism other than cancer related bone lesions
- History of polyneuropathy ≥ grade 3
- Patients with plasma cell leukemia
- Planned stem cell transplant (HSCT) or radiation for the duration of the study
- Skeletal related event within 2 weeks of study enrollment
- Has received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) within the last 21 days or is planned to receive ESAs during the course of the study
- Has received anti-myeloma therapy within the last 21 days
- Is scheduled to receive local radiation to bone during the course of the study
- Has taken estrogen, androgen, anabolic steroids, calcitonin or other bone-active drugs within 4 months of study enrollment
- Woman of childbearing potential (not undergone a hysterectomy or who have not been postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Celgenelead
Study Sites (2)
Investigative Site
Moscow, Russia
Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Related Publications (1)
Abdulkadyrov KM, Salogub GN, Khuazheva NK, Sherman ML, Laadem A, Barger R, Knight R, Srinivasan S, Terpos E. Sotatercept in patients with osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2014 Jun;165(6):814-23. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12835. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
PMID: 24650009BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Study Director
- Organization
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Abderrahmane Laadem, MD
Celgene Corporation
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2008
First Posted
September 4, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 3, 2024
Results First Posted
October 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06