Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Facilitating Extubation
Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam for Facilitating Extubation in Medical and Surgical ICU Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study is to evaluate the utility, safety, and cost of transitioning benzodiazepine sedation to dexmedetomidine in medical or surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring sedation when tracheal extubation is nearing. Fifty medical or surgical ICU patients requiring sedation with existing benzodiazepine therapy and qualifying for daily awakenings will be randomized in a double-blind manner to receive additional midazolam or dexmedetomidine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 28, 2016
CompletedSeptember 28, 2016
August 1, 2016
4.2 years
August 28, 2008
March 9, 2016
August 4, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time From Study Drug Initiation to Tracheal Extubation
Duration of ICU stay, for up to 24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Cumulative Doses of Conventional Sedatives and Analgesics
Duration of ICU stay, for up to 24 weeks
The Quality of Sedation (Assessed by the Riker Sedation-Agitation Score) and Analgesia (Assessed by the Pain Assessment Behavioral Score)
Duration of ICU stay, for up to 24 weeks
Sedation-related Adverse Effects
Duration of ICU stay, up to 24 weeks
ICU Experiences by Administering ICU Stressful Experiences Questionnaire (ICU-SEQ)
Duration of hospital stay, up to 24 weeks
Duration of Study Drug Administration
Duration of ICU stay, up to 24 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORMidazolam infusion of 1 mg/hour (final infusion concentration of 0.5 mg/mL) and adjusted by 1 mg/hour by the bedside nurse as needed for the desired level of sedation (Riker sedation-agitation score of 3 - 4) as other sedatives are down titrated. Daily awakenings are used.
Dexmedetomidine
EXPERIMENTALDexmedetomidine 0.15 µg/kg per hour (final infusion concentration of 0.075 µg/kg per mL) and adjusted by 0.15 µg/kg per hour by the bedside nurse as needed for the desired level of sedation (Riker sedation-agitation score of 3 - 4)as other sedatives are down titrated. Daily awakenings are used.
Interventions
Midazolam infusion of 1 mg/hour (final infusion concentration of 0.5 mg/mL) and adjusted by 1 mg/hour by the bedside nurse as needed for the desired level of sedation (Riker sedation-agitation score of 3 - 4)
Dexmedetomidine 0.15 µg/kg per hour (final infusion concentration of 0.075 µg/kg per mL) and adjusted by 0.15 µg/kg per hour by the bedside nurse as needed for the desired level of sedation (Riker sedation-agitation score of 3 - 4)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the medical or surgical ICUs.
- Currently receiving lorazepam or midazolam by continuous infusion for the purpose of sedation therapy.
- Sedation in these ICUs is provided using an ICU-wide order form that preferentially uses either lorazepam or midazolam with the infusion rate titrated by the bedside nurse to the desired Riker sedation-agitation score(s). Continuous analgesia is provided with fentanyl only with the infusion rate titrated by the bedside nurse to PABS ≤ 3 .
- Anticipated duration of continuous sedation \> 12 hours with the level of sedation expected to be maintained at Riker sedation-agitation score(s) of 3 - 4.
- Patients qualifying for daily awakenings as determined by all of the following:
- fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤ 70% or
- positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≤ 14 cmH2O,
- hemodynamically stable, and
- NOT receiving pharmacologic neuromuscular blockade.
- Informed consent and HIPAA authorization within 24 hours of qualifying for daily awakenings.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \< 18 years of age or \> 85 years of age.
- Patients receiving intermittent or "as needed" administration of lorazepam or midazolam.
- Patients receiving lorazepam or midazolam for purposes other than sedation (e.g. seizure control).
- Patients receiving epidural administration of medication(s).
- Patients with Childs-Pugh class C liver disease.
- Comatose patients by metabolic or neurologic affectation.
- Patients with active myocardial ischemia or second- or third-degree heart block.
- Moribund state with planned withdrawal of life support.
- Patients with known or suspected severe adverse reactions to midazolam (or any other benzodiazepine) or dexmedetomidine (or clonidine).
- Patients with alcohol abuse within six months of study eligibility.
- Pregnant females or females suspected of being pregnant.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80010, United States
Related Publications (1)
MacLaren R, Preslaski CR, Mueller SW, Kiser TH, Fish DN, Lavelle JC, Malkoski SP. A randomized, double-blind pilot study of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for intensive care unit sedation: patient recall of their experiences and short-term psychological outcomes. J Intensive Care Med. 2015 Mar;30(3):167-75. doi: 10.1177/0885066613510874. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
PMID: 24227448DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robert MacLaren
- Organization
- University of Colorado
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert MacLaren, PharmD
University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2008
First Posted
September 1, 2008
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
September 28, 2016
Results First Posted
September 28, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Publication