NCT00743717

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to provide evidence that the safety and effectiveness of the ceramic femoral component of the Gem Total Knee System is similar to FDA approved implants used in total knee replacement surgery. The hypotheses to be tested are that the investigational and control groups are equivalent in terms of patient success rate and complication-free rate.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
4

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2 knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2004

Longer than P75 for phase_2 knee-osteoarthritis

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2004

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 29, 2008

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 22, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

May 27, 2013

Status Verified

May 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

8.8 years

First QC Date

August 27, 2008

Results QC Date

February 27, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 21, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

total knee arthroplastyosteoarthritisceramic bearingzirconia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Knee Score at 2 Years Post Operation

    The criterion used to assess the outcome is a Knee Score (as defined by Knee Society Clinical Rating System) \> 80 points at two-years follow-up. This scoring system is defined in the following paper: Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, and Scott WN (1989). Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop(248): 13-4. The scale ranges from minimum of 0 (worst) to maximum of 100 (best). Knee Score \> 80 was used as a criterion to assess "success".

    within 2 years

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: zirconia femoral component

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: cobalt chrome femoral component

Interventions

total knee arthroplasty performed using implant with zirconia femoral component

1

total knee arthroplasty performed using implant with cobalt chrome femoral component

2

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Skeletally mature
  • Primary TKA for osteoarthritis or post-traumatic arthritis of the knee joint
  • Stable or reconstructable collateral and posterior cruciate ligaments
  • Correctable deformity
  • Intact quadriceps and hamstrings mechanisms
  • Patella bone thick enough (at least 15 mm) after resection

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous TKA
  • Bilateral knee arthritis
  • Non-availability for follow-up
  • Mental incompetence or confinement
  • Patients being treated with other investigational devices for same disorder
  • Infection
  • Osteoporosis, acute renal failure, or other disorders known to affect bone quality
  • Charcot's or Paget's disease
  • Patient physical condition preventing use of appropriate size implant
  • Disease conditions affecting blood supply to knee
  • Insufficient bone quality or quantity
  • Physical condition predisposing implant to extreme loads
  • History of septic knee arthritis
  • History of drug abuse

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, KneeOsteoarthritis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Perry Secor
Organization
Los Alamitos Orthopaedic Group

Study Officials

  • Vineet Sarin, PhD

    Kinamed Incorporated

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2008

First Posted

August 29, 2008

Study Start

February 1, 2004

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 27, 2013

Results First Posted

May 22, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-05