Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)Comparing GYNAECARE MORCELLEX Versus ROTOCUT GI Tissue Morcellators
GYNAECARE MORCELLEX Tissue Morcellator vs. ROTOCUT GI Tissue Morcellator: a Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To date, laparoscopic approach may apply to several gynecologic diseases. Among the recent advances in laparoscopy an important role was assumed by the methods of tissue extraction. In particular electronic power morcellators have become instruments of large use in surgical practice. The tissue morcellator is an endoscopic instrument indicated for cutting, coring and extracting tissue in operative laparoscopy, and it has a pivotal role during specific gynaecologic procedures as well as myomectomy and hysterectomy. The main advantages offered by electronic morcellator consist in reduction of operative time and of risk in hernia formation, this last due to the absence of fascia's tearing or stretching. Recently, a new generation of tissue morcellator has been commercialized. In particular, GYNECARE MORCELLEX (Ethicon-Johnson \& Johnson Gateway, US) and ROTOCUT G1 (Karl Storz, Culver City, CA, US) are two tissue morcellators currently available. These instruments seem to offer advantages over the previous models in terms of precision, speed and durability. The most useful of this features seems to be the higher speed, in particular it has been calculated that they morcellate tissues approximately four times faster than those of the previous generation. The high speed that characterizes this new morcellator potentially results in reduced operative time with consequent benefits in other surgical outcomes such as postoperative pain and recovery time. Even if both morcellator seems to be high-quality instruments, no study was designed until now to compare these two tools in a prospective fashion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jan 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedNovember 3, 2010
August 1, 2008
August 26, 2008
November 2, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Morcellament time
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Total operative time
Feasibility [subjective score of difficulty]
Blood loss
Post-operative complications
12 months
Postoperative pain
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy using GYNECARE MORCELLEX
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy using ROTOCUT G1
Interventions
Laparoscopic myomectomy with GYNECARE MORCELLEX: Laparoscopic approach. Longitudinal incision close to the midline of myoma. Identification of cleavage plane. Enucleation of myoma. Suturing myometrial. Removal of myoma with a automatic morcellator (GYNECARE MORCELLEX). Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using GYNECARE MORCELLEX: Laparoscopic approach. Use of bipolar diathermy and scissor starting with the round ligament and then the utero-ovarian ligament, otherwise the infundibulopelvic ligament in case of removal of adnexa. Identification, desiccation with polar diathermy, and transection of the uterine vessels. Repetition of the procedure on the contra-lateral side. Opening of vagina just below uterine vessels using an unipolar needle. Removal of uterus by means of GYNECARE MORCELLEX. Abdominal cavity irrigation.
Laparoscopic myomectomy with ROTOCUT G1: Laparoscopic approach. Longitudinal incision close to the midline of myoma. Identification of cleavage plane. Enucleation of myoma. Suturing myometrial. Removal of myoma with a automatic morcellator (ROTOCUT G1). Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using ROTOCUT G1: Laparoscopic approach. Use of bipolar diathermy and scissor starting with the round ligament and then the utero-ovarian ligament, otherwise the infundibulopelvic ligament in case of removal of adnexa. Identification, desiccation with polar diathermy, and transection of the uterine vessels. Repetition of the procedure on the contra-lateral side. Opening of vagina just below uterine vessels using an unipolar needle. Removal of uterus by means of ROTOCUT G1. Abdominal cavity irrigation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic uterine leiomyomas with main diameter over 5 cm
You may not qualify if:
- Major medical conditions
- Endocrinologic diseases
- Current or past, acute or chronic psychiatric disorders
- Premenstrual syndrome
- Use of drugs influencing cognition, vigilance and/or mood within six months of the study enrolment
- Hypoechoic or calcified leiomyomas at ultrasound
- Associated lesions in the uterus and adnexa at ultrasound
- Pattern of hyperplasia with cytologic atypia in the endometrial biopsy
- Abnormal Papanicolau smear test
- Positive urine pregnancy test result
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Magna Graecialead
- Johnson & Johnsoncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Magna Graecia
Catanzaro, Italy, 88100, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Zullo F, Falbo A, Iuliano A, Oppedisano R, Sacchinelli A, Annunziata G, Venturella R, Materazzo C, Tolino A, Palomba S. Randomized controlled study comparing the Gynecare Morcellex and Rotocut G1 tissue morcellators. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.11.009.
PMID: 20226407RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fulvio Zullo, MD, PhD
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, - Viale Europa Loc. Germaneto 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2008
First Posted
August 28, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
November 3, 2010
Record last verified: 2008-08