Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids
Halt
Evaluation of the Halt System for Laparoscopic Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids With Radiofrequency Ablation
1 other identifier
interventional
137
3 countries
11
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using the Halt System for the treatment of patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 3, 2014
CompletedJuly 3, 2014
June 1, 2014
2.8 years
April 1, 2009
October 24, 2013
June 3, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Assessment of Menstrual Blood Flow (MBF) at 12 Months Post Procedure
Change in volume of menstrual blood loss at 12 months post-procedure compared to baseline. Bleeding relief and surgical reintervention were the co-primary endpoints. Bleeding relief success was defined for individual subjects as a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in menstrual blood loss at 12 months posttreatment. The Primary Full Analysis Set was the primary analysis set for bleeding success rate.
12 months from Baseline
Incidence of Device and Procedure-related Adverse Events Within 12 Months Post-procedure
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who uses a medical device, regardless of the presumed relationship of the event to the study device. A serious adverse event is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Preexisting conditions (i.e., underlying diseases that were present before the adverse event reporting period began), re-intervention for failure to meet the study endpoints, and pregnancy were not reported as adverse events. All adverse events that occured during the study were recorded on the Adverse Event case report form (CRF). The investigator recorded the adverse event and assessed the relationship of the adverse event to the device and/or procedure; the coding of the events was reviewed by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).
12 months
Surgical Re-Intervention for Menorrhagia at 12 Months Post-treatment
Patients who had surgical reintervention for bleeding prior to 12 months follow-up. Surgical reintervention success was defined as no surgical reintervention for menorrhagia within the 12-month posttreatment period.
12 months from Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Uterine and Fibroid Volume at 12 Months Post-procedure Compared to Pre-procedure (Baseline) as Measured With Contrast-enhanced MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
12 month from Baseline
Change in Fibroid Symptom Severity and Quality of Life Scores at 12 Months Post-procedure as Compared to Pre-procedure (Baseline) Using the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health Related Quality of Life (UFS-QoL) Assessment Tool.
12 months from Baseline
Change in Score on Questionnaire - General Health Outcome at 12 Months Post-procedure as Compared to Pre-procedure Using the EQ-5D (a Standardized Instrument for Use as a Measure of Health Outcome)
12 months
Overall Subject Treatment Outcome and Satisfaction Using the Overall Treatment Evaluation (OTE)
12 months
Study Arms (1)
Halt Procedure
EXPERIMENTALIn this single-arm study, subjects who have symptomatic uterine fibroids will have the Halt Procedure in which intra-abdominal ultrasound will guide RF ablation of uterine fibroids using the Halt System.
Interventions
The Halt 2000 Electrosurgical Radiofrequency Ablation System is indicated for use in percutaneous, laparoscopic and intraoperative, coagulation and ablation of soft tissue.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Are premenopausal and ≥ 25 years old
- Have symptomatic uterine fibroids
- Have a uterine gestational size ≤14 weeks as determined by pelvic exam
- Have ≤ 6 (six) treatable fibroids in whom no single fibroid exceeds 7 cm in any diameter as measured by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Only Fibroids greater than 1cm in diameter should be treated in this study
- Have a total uterine fibroid volume that does not exceed 300cc on ultrasound or contrast-enhanced MRI evaluation
- Have clinical menorrhagia as indicated by menstrual blood loss of ≥160 mL to 500 ml during one baseline cycle or two baseline cycles within three months prior to treatment
- Have a history of at least 3 months of menorrhagia within the last six months
- Desire uterine preservation
- Do not desire current or future childbearing
- Have a normal coagulation profile international normalized ratio (INR), Platelets, Prothrombin Time, and Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT)
- Have had a normal Pap smear within the past 12 months
- Are practicing non-hormonal or stable hormonal contraception
- If the woman is not currently taking any hormonal contraceptives, has been off all hormonal contraceptives for a minimum of three months prior to study enrollment, and agrees to continue without change in regimen through the 12 months of follow-up OR
- If the woman is currently taking hormonal contraceptives, has taken hormonal contraceptives for a minimum of three months prior to study enrollment, and agrees to continue without change in regimen through 12 months of follow up.\*\*
- \*\*Note: Hormonal contraceptive use must be terminated 30 days prior to treatment but should be resumed post-operatively within 60 days post treatment as instructed by the Investigator.
- +4 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Have contraindications for laparoscopic surgery and/or general anesthesia. (Contraindications include anemia, defined as a hemoglobin level under 10 or hematocrit level less than 30.)
- Have had prior pelvic surgery (with the exception of C-section, tubal ligation, or diagnostic laparoscopy), or are known to have significant intra-abdominal adhesions (defined as adhesions that would require extensive dissection to mobilize and view all surfaces of the uterus)
- Have previously undergone endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, or uterine artery ligation, or any other uterine-preserving technique for reduction of menstrual bleeding (with the exception of hysteroscopic myomectomy \> 1 year ago)
- Patients requiring elective concomitant procedures
- Have contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Desire current or future childbearing
- Are pregnant or lactating
- Have taken any Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRh) agonist within three months prior to the screening procedures
- Have an implanted intrauterine or fallopian tube device for contraception that cannot or will not be removed one month prior to treatment
- Have dysfunctional uterine bleeding or bleeding between periods
- Have chronic pelvic pain not due to uterine fibroids
- Have known or suspected endometriosis
- Have known or suspected adenomyosis based on Ultrasound or MRI findings
- Have active or history of pelvic inflammatory disease
- Have a history of or evidence of gynecologic malignancy or pre-malignancy within the past five years
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
Women's Health Research
Phoenix, Arizona, 85015, United States
USC Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Pasadena Premier Women's Health
Pasadena, California, 91145, United States
Reproductive Science Center
San Ramon, California, 94583, United States
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan, 48034, United States
St. Luke's Hospital
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017, United States
Athena Gynecology Medical Group
Reno, Nevada, 89509, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461, United States
Magee-Women's Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Hospital Universitario Esperanza
Guatemala City, Departamento de Guatemala, 01010, Guatemala
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez de la Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon. Facultad de Medicina
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460, Mexico
Related Publications (6)
Chudnoff SG, Berman JM, Levine DJ, Harris M, Guido RS, Banks E. Outpatient procedure for the treatment and relief of symptomatic uterine myomas. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;121(5):1075-1082. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828b7962.
PMID: 23635746RESULTRobles R, Aguirre VA, Argueta AI, Guerrero MR. Laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of uterine myomas with 12 months of follow-up. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Jan;120(1):65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Oct 14.
PMID: 23073229RESULTGarza Leal JG, Hernandez Leon I, Castillo Saenz L, Lee BB. Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: feasibility study using the Halt 2000 Ablation System. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.02.006.
PMID: 21545960RESULTGuido RS, Macer JA, Abbott K, Falls JL, Tilley IB, Chudnoff SG. Radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of fibroids: a prospective, clinical analysis of two years' outcome from the Halt trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Aug 13;11:139. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-139.
PMID: 23941588RESULTLevine DJ, Berman JM, Harris M, Chudnoff SG, Whaley FS, Palmer SL. Sensitivity of myoma imaging using laparoscopic ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):770-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
PMID: 24021910DERIVEDGalen DI, Isaacson KB, Lee BB. Does menstrual bleeding decrease after ablation of intramural myomas? A retrospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):830-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
PMID: 24018147DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Laura Kemp, Sr. VP Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- Halt Medical, Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mary Hinckley, MD
Reproductive Science Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Micah Harris, MD
Women's Health Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erika Banks, MD
Montefiore Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karen R Abbott, MD
Athena Gynecology Medical Group
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jay Berman, MD
Wayne State University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jose G Garza Leal, MD
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Levine, MD
St. Johns' Mercy Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rodolfo Robles Pemueller, MD
Universidad Francisco Marroquín
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Israel, MD
University of Southern California
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard S Guido, MD
Magee-Women's Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Macer, MD
Pasadena Premier Women's Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2009
First Posted
April 2, 2009
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 3, 2014
Results First Posted
July 3, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-06