Evaluating the Cost-effectiveness, Efficacy, Safety and Tolerance of Mepilex® Ag Versus Silvadene®
An Open, Parallel, Randomized, Comparative, Multi-centre Investigation in US Evaluating the Cost-effectiveness, Efficacy, Safety and Tolerance of Mepilex® Ag Versus Silvadene® in the Treatment of Partial Thickness Burns.
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to compare the incremental costs (direct and indirect) and benefits (healing outcomes, quality of life) of using foam silver dressing (Mepilex® Ag) to a Silver sulfadiazine 1% cream (Silvadene®) from the perspective of the health care provider. The secondary objectives are to investigate the safety, the tolerance and the performance on burn status including pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2008
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 19, 2010
CompletedDecember 8, 2017
November 1, 2017
1.2 years
August 19, 2008
June 3, 2010
November 6, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare the Costs of Using the Interventions (Direct and Indirect)
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is calculated as the difference in total costs in each group divided by the difference in rate of full re-epithelialization (taken from the survival curve) at 20 days in each group (Δcosts/ Δeffects). Total costs were calculated based on the costs of primary and secondary dressings, silver sulphadiazine cream and estimated application, labor, supplies and pain medications. These costs were estimated from a representative sample of each population, across study facilities, using activity-based costing methods. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is interpreted as the price of additional health benefits. The ratio is supposed to be used by decision makers, in order for them to compare their willingness-to-pay for an additional health benefit with the pr
August 2008-August 2009
Study Arms (2)
Mepilex® Ag
EXPERIMENTALMepilex® Ag consists of a Safetac® soft silicone wound contact layer, a grey absorbent polyurethane foam pad containing a silver compound, activated carbon, and a vapour permeable waterproof film. Mepilex® Ag is an antimicrobial soft silicone foam dressing that absorbs exudate and maintains a moist wound environment. Mepilex® Ag contains silver sulphate that releases silver ions to inactivate a wide range of wound related pathogens (bacteria and fungi), shown in vitro. By reducing the number of microorganisms, Mepilex® Ag may also reduce odour.
Silvadene® Cream 1%
ACTIVE COMPARATORSilvadene® Cream 1% (silver sulfadiazine) is a topical antimicrobial drug indicated as an adjunct for the prevention and treatment of wound sepsis in patients with second-and third-degree burns.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a second degree burn covering 5% to 20% BSA. TBSA covered with burn is allowed to be up to 25%, allowing a maximum of 10% to be third degree burn (only the Second degree burn should be treated)
- Burn of thermal origin
- Both gender with an age ≥ 5 years at randomization
- Signed informed consent
- Subjects who are younger than the legal consenting age must have a legally authorized representative
You may not qualify if:
- \- Burns equal to or older than 36 hours
- Burns of chemical and electrical origin
- Clinically infected Burn (as judged by the investigator)
- Treatment of the burn with an active agent before study entry, SSD is allowed up to 24 hours prior to randomization
- Patients with necrotising leucocytic vasculitis or pyoderma gangrenosa.
- Diagnosed underlying disease(s) (e.g. HIV/AIDS, cancer and severe anaemia) judged by the investigator to be a potential interference in the treatment.
- Patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
- Patients treated with systemic glucocorticosteroids, except patients taking occasional doses or doses less than 10mg prednisolon/day or equivalent.
- Use of immunosuppressive agents, radiation or chemotherapy within the past 30 days.
- Known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the components of the investigation products.
- Patients with physical and/or mental conditions that are not expected to comply with the investigation.
- Participation in other clinical investigation(s) within 1 month prior to start of the investigation
- Pregnancy
- Previously randomised to this investigation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
LA County Hospital & USC Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
The Burn Center, Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Shands Burn Center, University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Joseph Still Burn Center
Augusta, Georgia, 30909, United States
UI Burn Treatment center
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10065, United States
Paul Silverstein Burn center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112, United States
St Christopher's Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19134, United States
Southwestern Regional Burn Center, Parkland Hospital
Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States
Department of Surgery
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Viktoria Ahlenius Körner
- Organization
- Mölnlycke Health Care
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul Silverstein
Paul Silverstein Burn Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2008
First Posted
August 27, 2008
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
December 8, 2017
Results First Posted
November 19, 2010
Record last verified: 2017-11