NCT00739492

Brief Summary

In the pilot study, Testing Strategies for Weight Loss, we tested two different approaches using financial incentives to encourage weight loss. In the first, we built on previous work showing the effectiveness of 'deposit contracts', in which subjects are given the opportunity to put their own money at risk if they do not lose weight. In this incentive condition, subjects received a direct payment conditional on daily weight loss, and an optional additional payment based on their own contributions to the deposit contract. We matched their contribution 1:1 to make the option of depositing their own money attractive to this predominantly low SES population. In the second approach we built on our own prior work using lotteries to promote drug adherence. In this incentive condition, participants are entered into a daily lottery, and receive any payoffs they earn from the lottery only if they stay on track with their weight-loss goal. Given their popularity in the general population, lotteries hold the promise of providing a cost-effective means of motivating weight loss and making efforts to lose weight more salient to obese patients. Results from this trial indicate significantly higher weight loss in the incentive arms of the trial than in the control group. The low lost to follow-up rates suggest that this approach to providing daily feedback to keep weight loss salient among participants is feasible. Incentive participants who completed the study called in their daily weights an average 95.8% of the time. 17/19 (89.4%) of subjects deposited money in their deposit contracts and 14/17 participants who made initial deposits either held constant or increased their contributions each month. Subjects in both incentive groups lost significantly more weight on average than subjects in the control group (4.0 lbs) (lottery 13.1 lbs, p = 0.015; deposit contract 14.0 lbs, p = 0.003). Of the subjects not lost to follow-up in the two incentive arms (32 out of 38), all of them lost weight. Based on this promising preliminary evidence and supplemental funding from the Hewlett Foundation, we propose an 8-month study with 2 intervention arms to further examine the effect of incentives on long term weight loss success. This study will build on the work to date to examine which intervention is most successful in promoting sustained weight loss. The proposed 3-arm extension will enroll 66 participants from Philadelphia VA with BMIs between 30 and 40, starting with those potential participants who were placed on a waiting list for our previous study after an overwhelming response to the initial mailing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1 obesity

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2008

Typical duration for phase_1 obesity

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2008

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2008

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 21, 2008

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

December 6, 2016

Status Verified

December 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

May 20, 2008

Last Update Submit

December 5, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

weight loss, obesity, financial incentives

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • actual weight loss

    eight months

Study Arms (3)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

deposit based incentive

Behavioral: financial incentives

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

deposit based incentive framed with "maintenance" period

Behavioral: financial incentives

3

NO INTERVENTION

Control arm, no financial incentive

Interventions

financial incentives based on attaining weight loss goals

12

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • BMI between 30-40;
  • Age between 30-70;
  • At least moderately interested in losing weight (Self-reported 3,4, or 5 on 5 point scale)

You may not qualify if:

  • Unstable medical conditions that would likely prevent the subject from completing the study;
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months;
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as BP\>170 mm Hg systolic or BP\>110 mm Hg diastolic;
  • Diabetic using any medicine besides metformin to control blood sugars
  • Metastatic cancer;
  • Self-report of 6 or more alcoholic beverages per day;
  • Severe depression;
  • Active substance abuse;
  • Schizophrenia
  • Inability to read or severe cognitive deficits that would preclude ability to read consent form or fill out surveys).
  • Participation in another research study unless copy of consent form obtained and screened for possible confounding of results.
  • Those currently enrolled in a weight loss program elsewhere.
  • Pregnant women

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ObesityWeight Loss

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBody Weight Changes

Study Officials

  • Kevin Volpp, MD PhD

    Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2008

First Posted

August 21, 2008

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion

June 1, 2009

Study Completion

January 1, 2010

Last Updated

December 6, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-12

Locations