NCT00729183

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the safety and treatment effect of 50 mg odanacatib (MK-0822) with Vitamin D versus placebo with Vitamin D in postmenopausal women with low bone density. The primary efficacy hypothesis is that odanacatib will increase aBMD at the lumbar spine compared to placebo at 12 months.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
214

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2008

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 4, 2008

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2008

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 2, 2008

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 23, 2010

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 21, 2011

Completed
6.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 16, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 27, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

August 4, 2008

Results QC Date

April 13, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)

    aBMD (g/cm\^2) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine and mean BMD measurements from at least 3 evaluable lumbar spine vertebrae (L1-L4) were used. If a vertebra was fractured at baseline or became fractured during the study, its BMD measurement was excluded from the analysis and the lumbar spine BMD was recalculated based on the three remaining vertebrae. aBMD data was centrally evaluated and all areal BMD measurements included a longitudinal BMD correction factor as determined by the quality control center. aBMD at the lumbar spine was assessed at the Screening visit (Baseline), Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24 for the repeated measures longitudinal Analysis of Covariates (ANCOVA) model, with percent change from baseline at Months 12 and 24 pre-specified to be reported as primary and secondary outcome measures, respectively.

    Baseline, 12 months

  • Percentage of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's products, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product was also an AE. The percentage of participants that experienced at least one AE was reported for each treatment arm.

    Up to ~14 days post study end (up to ~24 months)

  • Percentage of Participants That Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE

    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's products, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product was also an AE. The percentage of participants that discontinued study treatment (different from discontinuation of the study) due to an AE was reported for each treatment arm.

    Up to ~14 days post study end (up to ~24 months)

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Lumbar Spine aBMD

    Baseline, 24 months

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip aBMD

    Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck aBMD

    Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Trochanter aBMD

    Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Total Radius aBMD

    Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Odanacatib 50 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive 50 mg odanacatib and open-label 5600 IU vitamin D3 tablets once weekly for 24 months. Participants also receive 500 mg of open-label daily calcium supplement as needed to ensure a total daily calcium intake of 1200 mg.

Drug: OdanacatibDrug: Vitamin D3Drug: Calcium supplement

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants receive matching placebo to odanacatib and open-label 5600 IU vitamin D3 once weekly for 24 months. Participants also receive 500 mg of open-label daily calcium supplement as needed to ensure a total daily calcium intake of 1200 mg.

Drug: PlaceboDrug: Vitamin D3Drug: Calcium supplement

Interventions

Odanacatib 50 mg tablets, taken orally once weekly for 24 months.

Also known as: MK-0822
Odanacatib 50 mg

Matching placebo tablets to odanacatib taken orally once weekly for 24 months.

Placebo

Vitamin D3 tablets (5600 IU) taken orally once weekly for 24 months.

Odanacatib 50 mgPlacebo

Calcium supplement 500 mg tablet taken orally once daily (up to \~1200 mg total) for 24 months.

Also known as: calcium carbonate, calcium citrate
Odanacatib 50 mgPlacebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 85 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participant has been postmenopausal for 3 years
  • Participant has BMD t-score at the total hip, hip trochanter, femoral neck, or lumbar spine ≥ -1.5 but \> -3.5
  • Participant has 2 hips that are evaluable by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT), e.g. contain no hardware from orthopedic procedures
  • Participant is ambulatory

You may not qualify if:

  • Participant has had a previous hip fracture
  • Participant has had \>1 prior clinical vertebral fracture AND is a candidate for osteoporosis therapy
  • Participant has been treated with oral bisphosphonates, strontium, parathyroid hormone (PTH) or other agents with an effect on bone
  • Participant has had metabolic bone disorder other than osteoporosis
  • Participant has renal stones, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis (MS) or active parathyroid disease.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Engelke K, Fuerst T, Dardzinski B, Kornak J, Ather S, Genant HK, de Papp A. Odanacatib treatment affects trabecular and cortical bone in the femur of postmenopausal women: results of a two-year placebo-controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Jan;30(1):30-8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2292.

  • Brixen K, Chapurlat R, Cheung AM, Keaveny TM, Fuerst T, Engelke K, Recker R, Dardzinski B, Verbruggen N, Ather S, Rosenberg E, de Papp AE. Bone density, turnover, and estimated strength in postmenopausal women treated with odanacatib: a randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb;98(2):571-80. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2972. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Interventions

odanacatibCholecalciferolCalcium CarbonateCalcium Citrate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone Diseases, MetabolicBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CholestenesCholestanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSterolsVitamin DSecosteroidsMembrane LipidsLipidsCalcium CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsCarbonatesCarbonic AcidCarbon Compounds, InorganicMineralsCitric AcidCitratesTricarboxylic AcidsAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Organization
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Study Officials

  • Medical Monitor

    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2008

First Posted

August 7, 2008

Study Start

October 2, 2008

Primary Completion

March 23, 2010

Study Completion

March 21, 2011

Last Updated

August 27, 2018

Results First Posted

May 16, 2017

Record last verified: 2018-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

More information