Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Odanacatib (MK-0822) on Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Bone Micro-architecture and Overall Safety in Postmenopausal Women (MK-0822-031)
A Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Odanacatib (MK-0822) on Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Overall Safety, and to Estimate the Effect of Odanacatib (MK-0822) on Bone Micro-architecture in Postmenopausal Women Treated With Vitamin D
2 other identifiers
interventional
214
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the safety and treatment effect of 50 mg odanacatib (MK-0822) with Vitamin D versus placebo with Vitamin D in postmenopausal women with low bone density. The primary efficacy hypothesis is that odanacatib will increase aBMD at the lumbar spine compared to placebo at 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Oct 2008
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 2, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 23, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 21, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 16, 2017
CompletedAugust 27, 2018
July 1, 2018
1.5 years
August 4, 2008
April 13, 2017
July 27, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)
aBMD (g/cm\^2) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine and mean BMD measurements from at least 3 evaluable lumbar spine vertebrae (L1-L4) were used. If a vertebra was fractured at baseline or became fractured during the study, its BMD measurement was excluded from the analysis and the lumbar spine BMD was recalculated based on the three remaining vertebrae. aBMD data was centrally evaluated and all areal BMD measurements included a longitudinal BMD correction factor as determined by the quality control center. aBMD at the lumbar spine was assessed at the Screening visit (Baseline), Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24 for the repeated measures longitudinal Analysis of Covariates (ANCOVA) model, with percent change from baseline at Months 12 and 24 pre-specified to be reported as primary and secondary outcome measures, respectively.
Baseline, 12 months
Percentage of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's products, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product was also an AE. The percentage of participants that experienced at least one AE was reported for each treatment arm.
Up to ~14 days post study end (up to ~24 months)
Percentage of Participants That Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's products, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product was also an AE. The percentage of participants that discontinued study treatment (different from discontinuation of the study) due to an AE was reported for each treatment arm.
Up to ~14 days post study end (up to ~24 months)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Lumbar Spine aBMD
Baseline, 24 months
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip aBMD
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck aBMD
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Trochanter aBMD
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Radius aBMD
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Odanacatib 50 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive 50 mg odanacatib and open-label 5600 IU vitamin D3 tablets once weekly for 24 months. Participants also receive 500 mg of open-label daily calcium supplement as needed to ensure a total daily calcium intake of 1200 mg.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants receive matching placebo to odanacatib and open-label 5600 IU vitamin D3 once weekly for 24 months. Participants also receive 500 mg of open-label daily calcium supplement as needed to ensure a total daily calcium intake of 1200 mg.
Interventions
Odanacatib 50 mg tablets, taken orally once weekly for 24 months.
Vitamin D3 tablets (5600 IU) taken orally once weekly for 24 months.
Calcium supplement 500 mg tablet taken orally once daily (up to \~1200 mg total) for 24 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant has been postmenopausal for 3 years
- Participant has BMD t-score at the total hip, hip trochanter, femoral neck, or lumbar spine ≥ -1.5 but \> -3.5
- Participant has 2 hips that are evaluable by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT), e.g. contain no hardware from orthopedic procedures
- Participant is ambulatory
You may not qualify if:
- Participant has had a previous hip fracture
- Participant has had \>1 prior clinical vertebral fracture AND is a candidate for osteoporosis therapy
- Participant has been treated with oral bisphosphonates, strontium, parathyroid hormone (PTH) or other agents with an effect on bone
- Participant has had metabolic bone disorder other than osteoporosis
- Participant has renal stones, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis (MS) or active parathyroid disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Engelke K, Fuerst T, Dardzinski B, Kornak J, Ather S, Genant HK, de Papp A. Odanacatib treatment affects trabecular and cortical bone in the femur of postmenopausal women: results of a two-year placebo-controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Jan;30(1):30-8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2292.
PMID: 24898537DERIVEDBrixen K, Chapurlat R, Cheung AM, Keaveny TM, Fuerst T, Engelke K, Recker R, Dardzinski B, Verbruggen N, Ather S, Rosenberg E, de Papp AE. Bone density, turnover, and estimated strength in postmenopausal women treated with odanacatib: a randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb;98(2):571-80. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2972. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
PMID: 23337728DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Monitor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2008
First Posted
August 7, 2008
Study Start
October 2, 2008
Primary Completion
March 23, 2010
Study Completion
March 21, 2011
Last Updated
August 27, 2018
Results First Posted
May 16, 2017
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf