Intraperitoneal Local Anaesthetic in Colonic Surgery
Randomised Double Blind Trial to Investigate the Effects of Intraperitoneal Local Anaesthetic Following Colonic Surgery.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Aim: The general aim of this research group is to improve the recovery of patients after abdominal surgery. The specific aim of this study is to conduct a randomized, double blinded, controlled trial to investigate the effect of intra-peritoneal local anaesthesia application on postoperative pain and post-operative fatigue. This will be conducted in the setting of an enhanced recovery after surgery program (ERAS). Methods: Patients will be randomised by computer generated random numbers and opaque envelope method. In the treatment arm patients will receive 10ml 0.75% ropivacaine diluted to 50mls with 0.9% saline soon after the creation of the laparotomy . In the placebo arm, 50mls of 0.9% normal saline will be used in a similar fashion. At closure, two small 2mm catheter belonging to the On-Q pain buster system will be placed in the peritoneal cavity. This will be attached to a pump which will contain either a 0.2% ropivacaine solution or 0.9% saline placebo running at 4mls/hr for 68 hours. All members involved in patient care (with the exception of one nurse) will be blinded to the above. After 68 hours the pump will be stopped and the catheter will be removed. Assessment of postoperative pain will be performed by visual analogue scale, and fatigue assessment will be done using the Identity Consequence Fatigue Scale (ICFS) at various intervals post-operatively. Blood tests for inflammatory markers including glucose, cortisol, CRP, albumin and several cytokines as well as local anaesthetic levels will be taken. Significance to health: This method of analgesia administration has not been investigated in open major colonic surgery. This trial has wide reaching implications, with the potential to improve pain and thus recovery after abdominal surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Sep 2008
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedJanuary 13, 2010
January 1, 2010
1.2 years
July 23, 2008
January 12, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post operative recovery using the Identity consequence fatigue scale (ICFS)
Base-line, Day 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Post-operative rest, movement and cough pain using Visual analogue score
2,4,6,8,12,24,48,72 hours and on day 7
Post operative analgesia use using morphine equivalence data
Total use on day 1, day 2, day 3 post operatively and total use until discharge
Serum Ropivacaine level, serum Cytokine, serum Cortisol, serum glucose and serum CRP. Albumin, haematological parameters and biochemical parameters.
Pre-operatively, 8, 20, 48,72 hours post operatively
Questions aimed at symptoms of local anaesthetic toxicity
2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours post operatively
Recovery of bowel function measured by time to pass flatus and time to pass stool post-operatively.
Assessed at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 hours.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LA
EXPERIMENTALUse of Ropivacaine
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORUse of 0.9% saline
Interventions
In the treatment arm patients will receive 10mls 0.75% ropivacaine diluted to 50mls with saline immediately before closure. At closure, two small 2 mm catheters will be placed in the peritoneal cavity at the site of the operation to infuse local anaesthesia. This will penetrate through the skin once closure is complete. This will be attached to a small infusion pump (On-Q pain buster). This pump will contain 270mls of 0.2% ropivacaine. After 68 hours the pump will be stopped and the catheter will be removed in a similar fashion as routine drain removal.
In the placebo arm patients will receive 50 ml 0.9% saline into the peritoneum soon after the creation of the laparotomy. At closure, two 2 mm catheters will be placed in the peritoneal cavity at the site of the operation to infuse local anaesthesia. This will penetrate through the skin once closure is complete. This will be attached to a small infusion pump on-Q pain buster). This pump will contain 0.9% saline. After 68 hours the pump will be stopped and the catheter will be removed in a similar fashion as routine drain removal.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Consecutive patients undergoing open colonic resection at MSC under the ERAS program.
You may not qualify if:
- Known sensitivity to the local anaesthetic agents
- Patients who prefer not to participate (no consent gained)
- ASA greater or equal to 4
- Rectal resection
- Formation of stoma
- Current use of systemic steroids
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Manukau Surgery Centre-Middlemore Hospital
Auckland, Auckland, 2240, New Zealand
University of Auckland
Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Related Publications (2)
MacFater WS, Xia W, Barazanchi AWH, MacFater HS, Lightfoot N, Svirskis D, Kahokehr AA, Hill AG. Association between perioperative intraperitoneal local anaesthetic infusion and long-term survival and cancer recurrence after colectomy: follow-up analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial. ANZ J Surg. 2020 May;90(5):802-806. doi: 10.1111/ans.15753. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
PMID: 32090464DERIVEDKahokehr A, Sammour T, Zargar Shoshtari K, Taylor M, Hill AG. Intraperitoneal local anesthetic improves recovery after colon resection: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2011 Jul;254(1):28-38. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318221f0cf.
PMID: 21670611DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arman A Kahokehr, MBChB
University of Auckland, New Zealand
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew G Hill, FRACS
University of Auckland, New Zealand
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2008
First Posted
July 25, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
November 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 13, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-01