NCT00716482

Brief Summary

Our hypothesis is that the addition of ShearWave Elastography (SWE) to a conventional breast ultrasound examination provides useful information for the radiologist when imaging lesions in the breast, as compared to conventional grayscale ultrasound alone.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,681

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2008

Geographic Reach
5 countries

16 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2008

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 14, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 16, 2008

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2010

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 9, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

September 9, 2013

Status Verified

September 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

July 14, 2008

Results QC Date

April 4, 2013

Last Update Submit

September 2, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

breastlesionultrasoundBI-RADSmalignancywomen

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Estimates of Effect of Selectively Upgrading BIRADS Category 3 and Downgrading BIRADS 4a Masses Based on SWE Features. Overall Specificity and Sensitivity of BI-RADS Score Using Conventional B-mode Ultrasound vs. B-mode + Certain SWE Characteristics

    Positive reference standard = malignant cytologic or histopathologic result. Negative reference standard = BIRADS 2 lesions, BIRADS 3 lesions with benign histopathology, or a 1 year follow-up ultrasound exam showing resolved or decreased lesion size. Conservative strategy:features of E-homogeneity, E-max and E-color were used to upgrade BIRADS 3 lesions to BIRADS 4a' or downgrade BIRADS 4a lesions to BIRADS 3'. Aggressive strategy used the same features but upgraded and downgraded more lesions. Based on 939 lesions.

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Qualitative Intraobserver Reproducibility of SWE Related to Homogeneity Feature

    performed on the same day, within 2 years from study start date

  • Intraobserver Reliability of Quantitative SWE Measurements

    performed on the same day, within 2 years from study start date

  • Interobserver Agreement of B Mode Ultrasound and SWE Features

    performed on the same day, after study completion

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Population will consist of women who have been referred to a public or private hospital or clinic for a breast ultrasound evaluation. The sites are located various cities throughout the United States and Europe.

You may qualify if:

  • patients who have been referred to a breast ultrasound because of a positive physical palpation and/or positive mammograms and/or positive ultrasound and/or positive MRI.
  • female
  • age 21 or older
  • provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Women who are unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
  • Women with breast implants
  • Women with superficial lesions or lesions on skin (with the most superficial surface of the lesion within 5 mm of the skin surface)
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Women who are undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy for any cancer

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (16)

University of Southern California - LAC+USC Medical Center, OPD Rm 3P61

Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States

Location

Sally Jobe Breast Center

Denver, Colorado, 80206, United States

Location

Yale Medical Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology

New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States

Location

Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Dept. of Radiology

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Boston Medical Center, Radiology

Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States

Location

Thomas Jefferson Medical Center, Department of Radiology

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States

Location

Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz

Lyon, France

Location

University Hospital La Timone

Marseille, France

Location

Centre Antoine Lacassagne

Nice, France

Location

Institut Curie

Paris, France

Location

University Hospital, Frauenklinik

Greifswald, Germany

Location

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

Kiel, Germany

Location

Marienhospital, Klinik für Radiologie

Osnabrück, Germany

Location

German Diagnostic Clinic

Wiesbaden, Germany

Location

Ospedale Civile di Gorizia

Gorizia, Italy

Location

Charings Cross Hospital

London, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Cosgrove DO, Berg WA, Dore CJ, Skyba DM, Henry JP, Gay J, Cohen-Bacrie C; BE1 Study Group. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol. 2012 May;22(5):1023-32. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2340-y. Epub 2011 Dec 31.

  • Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ, Schafer FK, Svensson WE, Hooley RJ, Ohlinger R, Mendelson EB, Balu-Maestro C, Locatelli M, Tourasse C, Cavanaugh BC, Juhan V, Stavros AT, Tardivon A, Gay J, Henry JP, Cohen-Bacrie C; BE1 Investigators. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):435-49. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110640.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

* follow up on BI-RADS 2 lesions was not performed * operators knew the BI-RADS score of the lesion before performing SWE * more BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions were recruited because of the study design

Results Point of Contact

Title
Research Coordinator
Organization
SuperSonic Imagine

Study Officials

  • David O Cosgrove, MD

    Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2008

First Posted

July 16, 2008

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion

June 1, 2010

Study Completion

June 1, 2010

Last Updated

September 9, 2013

Results First Posted

September 9, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-09

Locations