Carbidopa/Levodopa Combined With Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence
Contingency Management Plus Levodopa/Carbidopa for Treatment of Cocaine Dependence
3 other identifiers
interventional
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cocaine dependence is a major public health problem and the development of a treatment for this disorder is a priority. To date, treatment interventions based on positive incentive principles have shown the strongest effects for improving substance use outcomes. One such example is contingency management (CM) interventions in which nondrug rewards are used to compete with cocaine. Recent evidence suggests that certain medications improve response to CM interventions, particularly agents that target dopamine reward systems in the brain. A promising dopamine-enhancing medication is levodopa. The study team has observed the strongest effects of levodopa when the medication is administered in the context of CM therapy, perhaps through mechanisms that enhance reward saliency. The proposed study is designed to further evaluate this promising treatment approach. Cocaine dependent outpatients will participate in a randomized, 2-group (levodopa vs. placebo), double-blind clinical trial. CM will be behavioral therapy platform for both treatment groups. The study will test the primary hypothesis that CM+levodopa will be more effective than CM+placebo in reducing cocaine use. This study is expected to validate the usefulness of a new behavioral-pharmacological treatment approach for cocaine dependence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2008
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 19, 2018
CompletedApril 23, 2018
March 1, 2018
3.9 years
July 9, 2008
February 16, 2018
March 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Confirmed Abstinence From Cocaine as Assessed by Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES)
The Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES) is the number of cocaine-negative urines collected out of the total scheduled urine tests for the 12-week trial (36 total scheduled urine tests per participant). The mean number of cocaine-negative urines over all time points is reported in this outcome measure.
12 weeks of treatment
Study Arms (2)
Levodopa pharmacotherapy
EXPERIMENTALLevodopa pharmacotherapy (800mg levodopa and 200mg carbidopa per day), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and contingency management (CM).
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and contingency management (CM).
Interventions
800mg levodopa and 200mg carbidopa per day
Participants received individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in 50-minute weekly sessions. These sessions were manual-driven and based on the relapse prevention model proposed by Marlatt and Gordon (1985). Trained masters-level therapists, under the supervision of senior therapists and the principal investigator, worked with participants to teach them how to recognize and cope with risky situations that could influence their cocaine use through self-monitoring of situational craving and drug use stimuli, coping skills training, and lifestyle modifications.
An abstinence-based contingency management (CM) procedure was used. Participants earned vouchers according to the reward schedule recommended by Budney and Higgins (1998), beginning at $2.50 for the first cocaine-negative urine. For each consecutive cocaine-negative urine, voucher values increased by $1.25 with a $10 bonus given for provision of three consecutive cocaine-negative urines within a week. A cocaine-positive urine or failure to provide a scheduled urine sample resulted in a reset of the schedule to the initial value of $2.50. After provision of five negative urines, the voucher returned to the value prior to the reset. Participants were able to redeem their vouchers for small amounts of cash (≤$25) or gift cards for goods and services.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- between 18 and 60 years of age
- meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th. Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for current cocaine dependence.
- be in acceptable health on the basis of interview, medical history and physical exam.
You may not qualify if:
- current DSM-IV diagnosis of any psychoactive substance dependence other than cocaine, marijuana, or nicotine.
- have a DSM-IV axis I psychiatric disorder or neurological disease or disorder requiring ongoing treatment and/or making study participation unsafe.
- have significant current suicidal or homicidal ideation.
- have medical conditions contraindicating levodopa/carbidopa pharmacotherapy. Conditions include severe pulmonary disease (bronchial asthma, emphysema), cardiovascular disease (severe or history of myocardial infarction with residual arrhythmias), narrow angle glaucoma, melanoma, history of peptic ulcer, renal function impairment.
- taking medications known to have significant drug interactions with levodopa/carbidopa (e.g., monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, anticonvulsants, haloperidol, phenothiazines, selegiline, anesthetics).
- currently or recently (last 3 months) treated for substance use or another psychiatric condition.
- having conditions of probation or parole requiring reports of drug use to officers of the court.
- impending incarceration.
- pregnant or nursing for female patients.
- inability to read, write, or speak English.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Lower than expected rates of retention and medication compliance likely reduced the statistical power of the study for estimating treatment effects of the medication intervention.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Joy M. Schmitz, PhD
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joy M Schmitz, PhD
University of Texas at Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor - Psychiatry, Behavioral Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2008
First Posted
July 11, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 23, 2018
Results First Posted
March 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03