Beta-blockade Effects on Memory for Cocaine Craving
Treatment Implications of Beta-blockade Effects on Memory for Cocaine Craving
4 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of propranolol versus placebo on responses to cocaine cues in cocaine dependent individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Feb 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 30, 2012
CompletedNovember 30, 2012
September 1, 2012
2.4 years
January 26, 2009
August 24, 2012
October 31, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Single Item Craving Test Session Difference Scores
Mean of the difference of Session 1 and Session 2 cocaine craving scores (Session 2-Session 1). Found by using our Single Item Craving (SIC) scale. A study team member asks the participant to verbally report the level of craving they were experiencing using values between 0 and 100, with 0 representing no craving and 100 extreme craving. The difference score was found by subtracting session 1 mean SICs during cue exposure from session 2 mean SICs during cue exposure. Therefore the mean of the difference could have ranged anywhere from -100 to 100. Negative mean difference scores reflect a decrease in craving for cocaine from session 1 (test) to session 2 (retrieval). The lower the mean difference score, the greater the decrease in craving.
Both days of cue exposure
Study Arms (2)
Propranolol 40mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Current cocaine dependence (within past month)
- Able to provide informed consent
- Use of birth control by female participants (barrier methods, surgical sterilization, IUD, or abstinence)
- Live within 50-mile radius of research site
- Consent to remain abstinent from all drugs of abuse (except nicotine) for 24 hours prior to inpatient admission and follow-up assessment
- Consent to random assignment to propranolol or placebo
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant, nursing or are of childbearing potential and not practicing/using birth control
- Evidence or history of significant hematological, endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, gastrointestinal or neurological disease
- Significant liver impairment
- History of or current psychotic disorder, current severe major depressive disorder, bipolar affective disorder or a severe anxiety disorder
- Currently taking anti-arrhythmic agents, psychostimulants or other agents known to interfere with heart rate and skin conductance monitoring
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to propranolol
- Individuals taking medications that could adversely interact with the study medication, including, but not limited to albuterol, insulin, or significant inhibitors of CYP2D6
- Individuals with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Lack of a "no retrieval" control group. Lack of determination of plasma propranolol levels following the medicated retrieval session. The sample size was insufficient to assess the more distal effects at 1-week follow-up.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Michael Saladin
- Organization
- Medical University of South Carolina
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Saladin, Ph.D.
Medical University of South Carolina
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2009
First Posted
January 27, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
November 30, 2012
Results First Posted
November 30, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-09