Clinical Trial for Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of a Echinacea/Sage Spray Compared to a Chlorhexidine/Lidocaine Spray in the Treatment of Acute Sore Throats
Multicentric Randomized Double Blind Double Dummy Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial for Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of a Echinacea/Sage Spray in Comparison to a Chlorhexidine/Lidocaine Spray in the Treatment of Acute Sore Throats
1 other identifier
interventional
154
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to show non-inferiority of an echinacea/sage spray compared to a chlorhexidine/lidocaine-spray in the treatment of acute sore throat during five days of treatment. Main outcome parameter is the non-inferiority in number of responders between the two treatment groups. A responder is defined as a reduction by 50% of the total baseline score taken prior to treatment start. The symptoms are assessed with a symptom score.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Feb 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2008
CompletedJuly 1, 2008
June 1, 2008
June 27, 2008
June 30, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
comparison of responder of the two treatment groups after the first, second, and third days. A responder is defined as a reduction by 50% of the total baseline score taken prior to treatment start.
first three days of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of response rates after 4th and 5th days of treatment; VAS throat pain; amount rescue medication used; global assessment efficacy Frequency of adverse events, global assessment of tolerability
five days of treatment
Study Arms (2)
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORDrug: Echinacea/sage patients received additionally a placebo-spray for the synthetical comparator (chlorhexidine/lidocaine) as the study was double dummy blinded. Patients had to apply spray every 2 hours with two puffs to the pharyngeal area up to a maximum of 10 times daily. Treatment duration was until illness was resolved or for a maximum of 5 consecutive days. Arms: 1
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORDrug: Chlorhexidine/lidocaine patients received additionally a placebo-spray for the synthetical comparator (echinacea/sage) as the study was double dummy blinded. Patients had to apply spray every 2 hours with two puffs to the pharyngeal area up to a maximum of 10 times daily. Treatment duration was until illness was resolved or for a maximum of 5 consecutive days.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 12 years;
- Acute pharyngitis or tonsillitis with symptoms of throat pain and inflammation of the pharynx and/or tonsils;
- A Tonsillopharyngitis Severity Score ≥6;
- Written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Analgesics \<12 hours;
- Antibiotics \<24 hours; t
- Topical throat pain medication \<4 hours;
- Systemic corticosteroids within the last month;
- Symptoms of primary bacterial pharyngitis or secondary bacterial infection;
- Serious illness such as tumors; allergy to one of the ingredients; pregnancy or lactation;
- Hypersensitivity to ibuprofen;
- Participation in another clinical trial in the previous 30 days.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- A. Vogel AGlead
Study Sites (1)
Allergy Clinic
Landquart, 7302, Switzerland
Related Publications (5)
Gertsch J, Schoop R, Kuenzle U, Suter A. Echinacea alkylamides modulate TNF-alpha gene expression via cannabinoid receptor CB2 and multiple signal transduction pathways. FEBS Lett. 2004 Nov 19;577(3):563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.10.064.
PMID: 15556647RESULTShah SA, Sander S, White CM, Rinaldi M, Coleman CI. Evaluation of echinacea for the prevention and treatment of the common cold: a meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Jul;7(7):473-80. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70160-3.
PMID: 17597571RESULTBereznoy VV, Riley DS, Wassmer G, Heger M. Efficacy of extract of Pelargonium sidoides in children with acute non-group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus tonsillopharyngitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Altern Ther Health Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;9(5):68-79.
PMID: 14526713RESULTHubbert M, Sievers H, Lehnfeld R, Kehrl W. Efficacy and tolerability of a spray with Salvia officinalis in the treatment of acute pharyngitis - a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with adaptive design and interim analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2006 Jan 31;11(1):20-6.
PMID: 16504956RESULTSchapowal A, Berger D, Klein P, Suter A. Echinacea/sage or chlorhexidine/lidocaine for treating acute sore throats: a randomized double-blind trial. Eur J Med Res. 2009 Sep 1;14(9):406-12. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-9-406.
PMID: 19748859DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dominique Kähler, MD
General practice, Hubstrasse 37, 9500 Wil, Switzerland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2008
First Posted
July 1, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2006
Study Completion
August 1, 2006
Last Updated
July 1, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-06