A Study of Flurbiprofen 8.75 mg Lozenge in Patient With Pharyngitis
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multiple-Dose Study to Determine the Efficacy, Onset, and Duration of Action of Flurbiprofen 8.75 mg Lozenge Compared to Its Vehicle Control Lozenge in Patients With Painful Pharyngitis
1 other identifier
interventional
204
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purposes of this study is to demonstrate the analgesic efficacy of flurbiprofen 8.75 mg lozenge compared to its vehicle lozenge and to demonstrate the safety of the flurbiprofen lozenge throughout the course of treating sore throat due to acute pharyngitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Nov 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 21, 2017
CompletedSeptember 21, 2017
August 1, 2017
1.3 years
January 13, 2010
June 30, 2015
August 23, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) in Sore Throat Pain Intensity Scale (STPIS) Over the 24 Hours Post-baseline (STPIS SPID24)
STPIS measures sore throat pain intensity on a 100-mm visual analog scale completed by participants. A mark at 0-mm indicates no pain upon swallowing and 100-mm indicates severe pain. SPID24 was calculated as the sum of the time-weighted pain intensity differences from baseline until 24 hours. The full range was -114609 (complete pain relief within 2 minutes of dosing that lasts 24 hours) to 29191 (maximum pain within 2 minutes lasting 24 hours) using the mean baseline STPIS. Participants with a last recorded time point \<21 hours were considered Not Evaluable. If a participant used rescue medication, all post-rescue STPIS values in the 24-hour interval were assigned the baseline value for STPIS. Missing scores of STPIS with non-missing STPIS scores at earlier and later assessments were imputed using linear interpolation assuming the time of the missing assessment to be the nominal time since initial dose.
baseline (pre-dose), 24 hours post-dose (every 2 minutes for one hour; every 10 minutes until hour 2; every 30 minutes until hour 6; and every hour the participant was awake between hours 7-24)
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Time Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) in Sore Throat Pain Intensity Scale (STPIS) Over the 2 Hours Post-baseline (STPIS SPID2)
baseline (pre-dose), 2 hours post-dose (every 2 minutes for one hour; every 10 minutes until hour 2)
Time Weighted Summed Differences in Difficulty Swallowing Scale (DSS) During the Initial 2 Hours From Baseline
baseline (pre-dose), 2 hours post-dose (every 10 minutes until hour 2)
Time Weighted Summed Differences in Difficulty Swallowing Scale (DSS) During the Initial 24 Hours From Baseline
baseline (pre-dose), 24 hours post-dose (every 10 minutes until hour 2, every 30 minutes until hour 6, hourly from 7-24 hours)
Time Weighted Summed Differences in Swollen Throat Scale (SwoTS) During the Initial 2 Hours From Baseline
baseline (pre-dose), 2 hours post-dose (at 1 hour, 70 minutes, 80 minutes, 90 minutes, 100 minutes, 110 minutes, and 2 hours)
Time Weighted Summed Differences in Swollen Throat Scale (SwoTS) During the Initial 24 Hours From Baseline
baseline (pre-dose), 24 hours post-dose (1 hour, 70 minutes, 80 minutes, 90 minutes, 100 minutes, 110 minutes, 2 hours, 2½ hours, 3 hours, 3½ hours, 4 hours, 4½ hours, 5 hours, 5½ hours, and 6 hours after the first dose, hourly from 7-24 hours)
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
flurbiprofen 8.75 mg lozenge
EXPERIMENTALParticipants sucked flurbiprofen 8.75mg lozenge every 3-6 hours up to 5 lozenges a day as needed for pain for 7 days.
Placebo lozenge
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants sucked vehicle placebo lozenge every 3-6 hours up to 5 lozenges a day as needed for pain for 7 days.
Interventions
Participants were instructed to suck one placebo lozenge during the initial two-hour clinic visit. Upon discharge, participants were instructed to use study medication lozenge every 3-6 hours as needed for pain, up to a total of 5 study lozenges in 24 hours.
Participants were instructed to suck one flurbiprofen 8.75 mg lozenge during the initial two-hour clinic visit. Upon discharge, participants were instructed to use study medication lozenge every 3-6 hours as needed for pain, up to a total of 5 study lozenges in 24 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient has a complaint of sore throat.
- If the patient is a female of childbearing potential, she has been using effective contraception since the last date of menses and is not breast-feeding or lactating.
- If the patient is a female of childbearing potential, the patient must have a negative urine pregnancy.
- The patient has provided written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient has a history of an upper gastrointestinal ulcer within the past 60 days, is currently experiencing clinically significant upper gastrointestinal complaints, or is currently taking medication regularly (≥ three times in the previous week).
- The patient has a history of any hepatic disease or renal dysfunction.
- The patient has a history of chronic analgesic use (≥ three times per week over the prior four weeks). (Patients on low-dose aspirin therapy may be allowed in the study per investigator's clinical decision.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Connecticut, Student Health Services
Storrs, Connecticut, 06268, United States
Related Publications (15)
Schachtel BP, McCormick CG and Giefer EE. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in the pharyngitis pain model. Abstract presented at the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Scientific Conference, Montreal, Canada. 2009
RESULTSchachtel BP, Aspley S, Sternberg M, Berry P, Muir N, Sanner K, Rezuke J, Savino L, Shephard A, Shea T, Schachtel E. Onset of demulcent and analgesic activity of flurbiprofen lozenge. Int J Clin Pharm 2012;34:143-258.
RESULTAspley S, Schachtel B, Berry P, Shephard A, Sanner K, Shea T, Smith G. The Chief Complaint: evidence of its use as an endpoint in a clinical trial. Journal of Pain 2012;13(4)Supplement:S4.
RESULTAspley S, Schachtel B, Berry P, Shephard A, Sanner K, Savino L, Rezuke J, Shea T, Smith G. Treatment of odynophagia and dysphagia by flurbiprofen 8.75 mg lozenges. Pain Research & Management 2012;17(3):203.
RESULTSchachtel B, Aspley S, Berry P, Shephard A, Shea T,Sanner K, Smith G,Schachtel E. Efficacy of flurbiprofen 8.75mg lozenges in patients with swollen/inflamed sore throat. Abstract presented at the 14th World Congress on Pain, 27 - 31 August 2012, Milan.
RESULTSchachtel B, Aspley S, Berry P, Smith G, Shephard A, Shea T, Schachtel E. A patient-centered method for determining onset of action. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development 2012;1(4):194-195.
RESULTSchachtel B, Aspley S, Berry P, Shephard A, Shea T, Smith G, Sanner K, Savino L, Rezuke J, Schachtel E. Efficacy and duration of flurbiprofen 8.75 mg lozenge. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development 2012;1(4):194.
RESULTSchachtel B, Aspley S, Berry P, Shephard A, Shea T, Smith G, Schachtel E. A new cough model: de-hawthornizing a clinical trial. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development 2012;1(4):195.
RESULTSchachtel B, Aspley S, Berry P, Shephard A, Sanner K, Shea T, Smith G, Schachtel E. Chief Complaint: the therapeutogenic stimulus as the primary, individualized endpoint in clinical trials. Journal of Pain 2012;13(4)Supplement:S6.
RESULTAspley S, Schachtel B, Berry P, Shephard A, Shea T, Smith G, Schachtel E. Flurbiprofen lozenges in patients with a "bad sore throat". Journal of Pain 2013;14(4):S59.
RESULTSchachtel B, Aspley S, Berry P, Shephard A, Shea T, Smith G, Schachtel E. The "Definite Improvement Level" (DIL) as a determinant of drug efficacy. Journal of Pain 2013;14(4):S5.
RESULTShephard A, Smith G, Aspley S, Schachtel B. Efficacy of flurbiprofen 8.75 mg lozenges for streptococcal and non-streptococcal sore throat: pooled analysis of two randomised, placebo-controlled studies. Abstract presented at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), 27 - 30 April 2013, Berlin.
RESULTShephard A, Smith G, Aspley S, Schachtel B. Symptomatic relief in streptococcal and non-streptococcal sore throat patients: pooled analysis of two randomised, placebo-controlled studies. Abstract presented at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), 27-30 April 2013, Berlin.
RESULTAspley S, Shephard A, Schachtel E, Sanner K, Savino L, Schachtel B. Efficacy of flurbiprofen 8.75 mg lozenge in patients with a swollen and inflamed sore throat. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Sep;32(9):1529-38. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1187119. Epub 2016 May 18.
PMID: 27146963DERIVEDShephard A, Smith G, Aspley S, Schachtel BP. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies on flurbiprofen 8.75 mg lozenges in patients with/without group A or C streptococcal throat infection, with an assessment of clinicians' prediction of 'strep throat'. Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Jan;69(1):59-71. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12536. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
PMID: 25296661DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gail Solomon, Director, Clinical Development
- Organization
- Reckitt Benckiser Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Timothy J Shea, BS
Reckitt Benckiser Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2010
First Posted
January 14, 2010
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
September 21, 2017
Results First Posted
September 21, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08