A Trial Comparing Circumferential Casting Versus Splinting in Displaced Colles' Fractures
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Circumferential Casting Versus Splinting in Displaced Colles' Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Displaced fractures of the distal radius requiring closed reduction (otherwise known as Colles fractures) are common in the emergency department. The purpose of the study is to determine if there is any difference between 3 methods of immobilization for these fractures: circumferential cast, volar-dorsal splint, and modified sugar tong splint. Maintenance of position was assessed at 4 weeks after the injury and wrist strength and function were assessed at 2 months and 6 months. We hypothesize that there will not be a clinically important difference between these methods of immobilizing for displaced fractures of the distal radius requiring closed reduction. Extended description of the protocol, including information not already contained in other fields. Objectives: Primary: To determine the effectiveness of three immobilization methods (circumferential cast \[CC\], volar dorsal splint \[VDS\], modified sugar-tong \[MST\] splint) in maintaining the position of displaced distal radius fractures after successful closed reduction. Secondary to assess long term functional outcomes associated with fiberglass splint immobilization versus standard cylindrical casting in patients maintaining initial non-operative reductions. Design: Randomized prospective single blind controlled trial Patients/Participants: Patients over 18 years of age who presented to the emergency department with a displaced fracture of the distal radius, requiring closed reduction. Outcome Measurements: Loss of reduction (radiological slippage or the need for surgical fixation during the 3-4 week primary immobilization period after initial successful reduction). Secondary outcomes were DASH score, return to work, activities of daily living (ADL), wrist pain, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength. Study Phase Phase 3 Study Type Interventional - Assigned to treatment Recruitment status Completed 2003 Record Verification Date March 2003 Anticipated trial start date November 1998 Last Follow-Up Date December 2002 Data Entry Closure Date January 2004 Study Completion Date July 2004 Purpose Treatment Allocation Randomized Masking Single Blind Control Active Assignment Parallel Endpoints Efficacy Primary outcome Radiologic slippage of fracture at 4 weeks post reduction Key secondary outcomes Functional outcomes: DASH score, return to work, activities of daily living (ADL), wrist pain, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Nov 1998
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 1998
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2008
CompletedJune 25, 2008
June 1, 2008
June 23, 2008
June 24, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radiologic slippage of fracture at 4 weeks post reduction
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Functional outcomes: DASH score, return to work, activities of daily living (ADL), wrist pain, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength
4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORCylindrical cast
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORModified sugar tong cast
3
ACTIVE COMPARATORVolar dorsal splint
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years
- Displaced fracture of distal radius requiring closed reduction
You may not qualify if:
- Open fracture
- Previous displaced fracture involving the same or contralateral distal radius
- neuromuscular deficits or CVA of either upper extremity that impaired functional outcome assessment
- concurrent carpal bone fractures or dislocations - - unstable fractures requiring primary open reduction and internal fixation
- skin allergy or sensitivity to either of the immobilization materials
- Smith's, Barton's or Chauffeur fractures
- Neurovascular compromise of the affected limb - - Bilateral distal radius fractures that prevented follow-up comparison with a normal contralateral limb
- Other significant and concurrent injuries in the ipsilateral extremity.
- Undisplaced distal radius fracture
- Reduction performed in the ED did not meet criteria for successful fracture reduction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of British Columbialead
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Emergency Medicine, St Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V1Y 1Z1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Stenstrom, MD, Ph.D
University of British Columbia
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eric Grafstein, MD
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2008
First Posted
June 25, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 1998
Study Completion
January 1, 2004
Last Updated
June 25, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-06