NCT00700752

Brief Summary

This study seeks to evaluate the clinical and subjective performance of two established soft contact lenses.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2008

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2008

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 19, 2008

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2008

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 20, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

May 21, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

June 17, 2008

Results QC Date

August 25, 2010

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient-reported Comfort at at the Manufacturer's Recommended Lens Replacement Timeframe of 2-weeks (Senofilcon A) or 4-weeks (Balafilcon A).

    Subjective rating of overall comfort using a 0 through 5 scale. 0=n/a, 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, 5=excellent. Scores from 2-week and 4-week visits were combined for final values.

    after 4 weeks of lens wear

Study Arms (2)

senofilcon A/balafilcon A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

senofilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lens worn during first 4-week period, balafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lens worn during the second 4-week period. Senofilcon A lenses worn daily on a 2-week replacement schedule; balafilcon A lenses worn daily on a 4-week replacement schedule. Lens replacement conducted in-office in a masked process.

Device: senofilcon ADevice: balafilcon A

balafilcon A/senofilcon A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

balafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lens worn worn during first 4-week period, senofilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lens worn during the second 4-week period. Senofilcon A lenses worn daily on a 2-week replacement schedule; balafilcon A lenses worn daily on a 4-week replacement schedule. Lens replacement conducted in-office in a masked process.

Device: senofilcon ADevice: balafilcon A

Interventions

silicone hydrogel contact lens

balafilcon A/senofilcon Asenofilcon A/balafilcon A

silicone hydrogel contact lens

balafilcon A/senofilcon Asenofilcon A/balafilcon A

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • They are of legal age (18 years) and capacity to volunteer.
  • They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  • They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  • They would be expected to attain at least 6/9 (20/30) in each eye with the study lenses.
  • They are able to wear contact lenses with a back vertex power of -1.00 to -6.00DS.
  • They have a maximum of 1.00D of refractive astigmatism (i.e. ≤ 1.00 DC).
  • They have successfully worn contact lenses within six months of starting the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  • They are aphakic.
  • They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  • They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or has keratoconus.
  • They are pregnant or lactating.
  • They have grade 2 or greater of any of the following ocular surface signs: corneal oedema, corneal vascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal conjunctival changes or any other abnormality which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • They have any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis) or any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
  • They have diabetes.
  • They have taken part in any other clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Indiana University

Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Refractive ErrorsMyopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Kurt Moody OD
Organization
Vistakon

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2008

First Posted

June 19, 2008

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2008

Study Completion

July 1, 2008

Last Updated

May 21, 2015

Results First Posted

September 20, 2010

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations