Comparison of Breathing Events Detected by the SleepStyle 200 Auto Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Device to Attended Polysomnography
Investigation of Methods to Detect Respiratory Irregularities in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is a common sleep-breathing disorder affecting around 2-4% of the population and is characterised by loud snoring, periodic collapse of the upper airway particular to sleep, sleep fragmentation, and sometimes daytime sleepiness. Health consequences include impaired cognitive functioning, quality of life, mood, and increased cardiovascular disease risk. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that increased morbidity and mortality in a dose response manner with increasing severity of sleep disordered breathing. The standard treatment for OSA is nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), which consists of pressurized air applied to the nose via a mask. Generally a single, optimal pressure is prescribed for a patient based on a full night or partial night study during which the pressure is adjusted by a technician until all sleep disordered breathing (SDB) events are abolished. Despite therapy efficacy, compliance to CPAP therapy is sub-optimal. Due to low compliance it has become common for healthcare providers to follow up subject therapy efficacy through reporting software inherent in many current CPAP devices. Healthcare providers can use this reported data to make appropriate treatment decisions. For this reason the data needs to be accurate. The SleepStyle™ 200 Auto Series CPAP humidifier is an auto adjusting CPAP which stores comprehensive compliance data. The aim of this study is to compare the reliability of the SleepStyle™ 200 Auto Series CPAP data to laboratory-based PSG in detecting sleep disordered breathing. Hypothesis: The SleepStyle™ 200 Auto Series reporting features accurately detects indices of sleep disordered breathing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2008
CompletedDecember 9, 2008
December 1, 2008
6 months
June 11, 2008
December 7, 2008
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Apnea Hypopnea Index
At the end of the sleep study.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI)
At the end of the sleep study (PSG)
Study Arms (1)
1
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects will be placed on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy during a full night sleep study or polysomnography (PSG). The subjects will spend 2 hours on sub-therapeutic CPAP 4 cmH2O of pressure and the remainder on there therapeutic pressure. Values reported on the device will be compared to scored values from manual scoring of the sleep study.
Interventions
The device will record on internal software perceived sleep disordered breathing events. Events will also be scored manually on the polysomnography (PSG. Results will then be compared.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) \>15 from diagnostic night
- ≥18 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindicated for CPAP use
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Auckland Hospital, Adult Sleep & Ventilation Service, Auckland City Hospital
Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jessica R Hayward, Msc
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2008
First Posted
June 13, 2008
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion
November 1, 2008
Study Completion
November 1, 2008
Last Updated
December 9, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-12