Enema Use and Acceptability in HIV Negative Men Who Have Sex With Men
A Randomized, Blinded, Comparative Study of the Mucosal Toxicity, Colorectal Distribution, and Participant Acceptability of Three Different Preparatory Enemas (Hypo-, Iso-, and Hyper-osmolar)
1 other identifier
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is looking at 3 different types of enemas used before receptive anal intercourse in men who have sex with men (MSM). We are investigating whether the enemas cause any damage to the lining of the colon, how far up the colon the enemas travel after they are given, and how much study participants like using each of the enemas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable hiv-infections
Started Jul 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable hiv-infections
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 28, 2017
CompletedApril 28, 2017
March 1, 2017
2 years
June 4, 2008
December 5, 2016
March 20, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mucosal Toxicity Using Histopathology
Endoscopy will be performed to obtain biopsy specimens at baseline and following each inpatient enema exposure. Samples will be obtained at each flexible sigmoidoscopy and set aside for batch sectioning and H\&E staining. Slides will be reviewed and scored by a qualified pathologist blinded to treatment assignment using a qualitative scoring system. This scoring system uses semi-quantitative scoring that focuses on acute toxicity to epithelial cell layer similar to that seen in animal studies. This is a categorical grading scale, where 0 = Epithelial surface intact;1 = \<1/3 of surface denuded; 2 = 1/3 - 2/3rds of surface denuded;3 = More than 2/3rds of surface denuded. Six separate biopsies for each subject and each treatment intervention were analyzed in a multi-level analysis. In comparison with the baseline condition (no intervention), the odds and 95% confidence interval (CI) of having a higher epithelial denudation score were calculated for each intervention.
One hour following enema exposure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Radiolabel Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-24 hr)
24 hours following each intervention
D(Average) at Two Hours
two hours following dosing of intervention
Study Arms (3)
A
EXPERIMENTALTap water enema (hypo-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 1), Followed by Normosol-R enema (iso-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home(Stage 2), Followed by Fleet enema (hyper-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 3)
B
EXPERIMENTALNormosol-R enema (iso-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 1), Followed by Fleet enema (hyper-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 2), Followed by Tap water enema (hypo-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 3)
C
EXPERIMENTALFleet enema (hyper-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 1), Followed by Tap water enema (hypo-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 2), Followed by Normosol-R enema(iso-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 3)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male
- ≥ Age of 18
- HIV-1 status antibody negative as documented at screening
- A history of RAI at least twice per month in the prior 3 months\*
- Required to assure that subjects are likely to complete each stage of enema test article use in a reasonable amount of time.
- History of enema use prior to RAI at least some of the time
- Willing to use each study product prior to RAI on 3 separate occasions.
- Willing to refrain from RAI for 48 hours before and after inpatient periods.
- Willing to use condoms for the duration of the study
- Availability to return for all study visits, barring unforeseen circumstances
- Understands and agrees to local Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) reporting requirements
- Able and willing to communicate in English
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent to take part in the study
- Able and willing to provide adequate information for locator purposes
You may not qualify if:
- Female
- HIV positive at baseline
- History of inflammatory bowel disease
- Active inflammatory condition of the GI tract at baseline
- Active rectal infection at Visit 2 (Infections identified during the screening period must be treated prior to Visit 2)
- Presence of any painful anorectal conditions that would be tender to manipulation. (Participants with hemorrhoids and/or anal warts that are not painful may participate.)
- History of prosthetic cardiac valves, including bioprosthetic and homograft valves, previous bacterial endocarditis, surgically constructed systemic pulmonary shunts or conduits, and complex cyanotic congenital heart disease such as single ventricle states, transposition of the great arteries, tetralogy of Fallot or similar conditions that put the subject at high risk for bacteremia during endoscopy, hence requiring antibiotic prophylaxis.
- Unwillingness to refrain from chronic use of aspirin and NSAIDs.
- Use of warfarin or heparin
- Use of systemic immunomodulatory medications within 72 hours of Visit 2 baseline
- Use of rectally administered medications, including over-the-counter enemas, within 72 hours of Visit 2 baseline
- Use of product containing nonoxynol-9 rectally within 72 hours of Visit 2
- Use of any investigational products within 72 hours of Visit 2 baseline
- Any other clinical condition or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for the study or unable to comply with the study requirements. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, current or recent history of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral disease, or coagulopathies.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- University of California, Los Angelescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Associate Director, Drug Development Unit
- Organization
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Craig Hendrix, MD
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2008
First Posted
June 13, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 28, 2017
Results First Posted
April 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share