NCT00696618

Brief Summary

This study is looking at 3 different types of enemas used before receptive anal intercourse in men who have sex with men (MSM). We are investigating whether the enemas cause any damage to the lining of the colon, how far up the colon the enemas travel after they are given, and how much study participants like using each of the enemas.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
9

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable hiv-infections

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable hiv-infections

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2007

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 4, 2008

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 13, 2008

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2009

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2012

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 28, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 4, 2008

Results QC Date

December 5, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

HIV preventionMSMEnemaHIV Seronegativity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mucosal Toxicity Using Histopathology

    Endoscopy will be performed to obtain biopsy specimens at baseline and following each inpatient enema exposure. Samples will be obtained at each flexible sigmoidoscopy and set aside for batch sectioning and H\&E staining. Slides will be reviewed and scored by a qualified pathologist blinded to treatment assignment using a qualitative scoring system. This scoring system uses semi-quantitative scoring that focuses on acute toxicity to epithelial cell layer similar to that seen in animal studies. This is a categorical grading scale, where 0 = Epithelial surface intact;1 = \<1/3 of surface denuded; 2 = 1/3 - 2/3rds of surface denuded;3 = More than 2/3rds of surface denuded. Six separate biopsies for each subject and each treatment intervention were analyzed in a multi-level analysis. In comparison with the baseline condition (no intervention), the odds and 95% confidence interval (CI) of having a higher epithelial denudation score were calculated for each intervention.

    One hour following enema exposure

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Radiolabel Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-24 hr)

    24 hours following each intervention

  • D(Average) at Two Hours

    two hours following dosing of intervention

Study Arms (3)

A

EXPERIMENTAL

Tap water enema (hypo-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 1), Followed by Normosol-R enema (iso-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home(Stage 2), Followed by Fleet enema (hyper-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 3)

Drug: Fleet EnemaDrug: tap water enemaDrug: Normosol-R enema

B

EXPERIMENTAL

Normosol-R enema (iso-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 1), Followed by Fleet enema (hyper-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 2), Followed by Tap water enema (hypo-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 3)

Drug: Fleet EnemaDrug: tap water enemaDrug: Normosol-R enema

C

EXPERIMENTAL

Fleet enema (hyper-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 1), Followed by Tap water enema (hypo-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 2), Followed by Normosol-R enema(iso-osmolar) administered rectally 125 mL one time in the clinic, then self-administered on three separate occasions at home (Stage 3)

Drug: Fleet EnemaDrug: tap water enemaDrug: Normosol-R enema

Interventions

hyper-osmolar preparation

Also known as: hyperosmolar enema
ABC

hypo-osmolar preparation

Also known as: hypo-osmolar enema
ABC

iso-osmolar preparation

Also known as: iso-osmolar enema
ABC

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male
  • ≥ Age of 18
  • HIV-1 status antibody negative as documented at screening
  • A history of RAI at least twice per month in the prior 3 months\*
  • Required to assure that subjects are likely to complete each stage of enema test article use in a reasonable amount of time.
  • History of enema use prior to RAI at least some of the time
  • Willing to use each study product prior to RAI on 3 separate occasions.
  • Willing to refrain from RAI for 48 hours before and after inpatient periods.
  • Willing to use condoms for the duration of the study
  • Availability to return for all study visits, barring unforeseen circumstances
  • Understands and agrees to local Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) reporting requirements
  • Able and willing to communicate in English
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent to take part in the study
  • Able and willing to provide adequate information for locator purposes

You may not qualify if:

  • Female
  • HIV positive at baseline
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Active inflammatory condition of the GI tract at baseline
  • Active rectal infection at Visit 2 (Infections identified during the screening period must be treated prior to Visit 2)
  • Presence of any painful anorectal conditions that would be tender to manipulation. (Participants with hemorrhoids and/or anal warts that are not painful may participate.)
  • History of prosthetic cardiac valves, including bioprosthetic and homograft valves, previous bacterial endocarditis, surgically constructed systemic pulmonary shunts or conduits, and complex cyanotic congenital heart disease such as single ventricle states, transposition of the great arteries, tetralogy of Fallot or similar conditions that put the subject at high risk for bacteremia during endoscopy, hence requiring antibiotic prophylaxis.
  • Unwillingness to refrain from chronic use of aspirin and NSAIDs.
  • Use of warfarin or heparin
  • Use of systemic immunomodulatory medications within 72 hours of Visit 2 baseline
  • Use of rectally administered medications, including over-the-counter enemas, within 72 hours of Visit 2 baseline
  • Use of product containing nonoxynol-9 rectally within 72 hours of Visit 2
  • Use of any investigational products within 72 hours of Visit 2 baseline
  • Any other clinical condition or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for the study or unable to comply with the study requirements. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, current or recent history of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral disease, or coagulopathies.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Interventions

sodium phosphate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Blood-Borne InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesInfectionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, ViralSexually Transmitted DiseasesLentivirus InfectionsRetroviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmune System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Associate Director, Drug Development Unit
Organization
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Craig Hendrix, MD

    Johns Hopkins University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2008

First Posted

June 13, 2008

Study Start

July 1, 2007

Primary Completion

July 1, 2009

Study Completion

March 1, 2012

Last Updated

April 28, 2017

Results First Posted

April 28, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations