Safety and Efficacy of Bimatoprost Solution in Increasing Overall Eyelash Prominence
1 other identifier
interventional
278
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of topical bimatoprost solution for enhancing eyelash prominence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 12, 2009
CompletedOctober 30, 2013
September 1, 2013
6 months
June 5, 2008
January 14, 2009
September 26, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least a 1-grade Increase on the Global Eyelash Assessment (GEA) Scale From Baseline to Week 16
The GEA scale is an investigator-graded 4-point ordinal scale of overall eyelash prominence (1 \[minimal\], 2 \[moderate\], 3 \[marked\], 4 \[very marked\])
Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least a 1-grade Increase on the Global Eyelash Assessment (GEA) Scale From Baseline to Week 20 (Post-treatment)
The GEA scale is an investigator-graded 4-point ordinal scale of overall eyelash prominence (1 \[minimal\], 2 \[moderate\], 3 \[marked\], 4 \[very marked\])
Baseline to Week 20
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Upper Eyelash Length as Measured by Digital Image Analysis in Terms of Change From Baseline to Week 16
Baseline to Week 16
Upper Eyelash Length as Measured by Digital Image Analysis in Terms of Change From Baseline to Week 20 (Post-treatment)
Baseline to Week 20
Upper Eyelash Thickness as Measured by Digital Image Analysis in Terms of Change From Baseline to Week 16
Baseline to Week 16
Upper Eyelash Thickness as Measured by Digital Image Analysis in Terms of Change From Baseline to Week 20 (Post-treatment)
Baseline to Week 20
Upper Eyelash Darkness as Measured by Digital Image Analysis in Terms of Change From Baseline to Week 16
Baseline to Week 16
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Patient Reported Outcome: Overall Satisfaction With Eyelashes (Single Item) in Terms of Change From Baseline to Week 16
Baseline to Week 16
Patient Reported Outcome: Overall Satisfaction With Eyelashes (Single Item) in Terms of Change From Baseline to Week 20 (Post-treatment)
Baseline to Week 20
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALBimatoprost 0.03% solution
2
PLACEBO COMPARATORVehicle solution
Interventions
Apply one drop of study medication using single-use per eye applicator to upper eyelid margin once daily.
Apply one drop of study medication using single-use per eye applicator to upper eyelid margin once daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Dissatisfaction with eyelash prominence,
- Eyelash prominence assessment of minimal or moderate,
- Ability to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects without visible lashes,
- Asymmetrical (uneven lashes or longer on one side than the other) eyelashes,
- Any eye disease or abnormality,
- Eye surgery,
- Permanent eyeliner,
- Eyelash implants,
- Eyelash extension application,
- Any use of eyelash growth products within 6 months of study entry,
- Treatments that may effect hair growth,
- Subjects requiring eye drop medications for glaucoma,
- Subjects having a situation or condition, which the study doctor feels might put you at risk, may make the study results confusing, or may interfere with the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Allerganlead
Study Sites (2)
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Fagien S, Walt JG, Carruthers J, Cox SE, Wirta D, Weng E, Beddingfield FC 3rd. Patient-reported outcomes of bimatoprost for eyelash growth: results from a randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Aug 1;33(6):789-98. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13495887. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
PMID: 23873891DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- Allergan, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2008
First Posted
June 9, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2007
Primary Completion
October 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2007
Last Updated
October 30, 2013
Results First Posted
May 12, 2009
Record last verified: 2013-09